|
|||
|
American Media, Stay Away From MePosted on Dec 4, 2011
American news media outlets such as Time and Newsweek are keeping the U.S. in the dark about world issues; a Silicon Valley startup has dreamed up a ship for international techies to avoid immigration problems; and Wi-Fi and cellphones are making us sick—or are they? These discoveries and more below. On a regular basis, Truthdig brings you the news items and odds and ends that have found their way to Larry Gross, director of the USC Annenberg School for Communication. A specialist in media and culture, art and communication, visual communication and media portrayals of minorities, Gross helped found the field of gay and lesbian studies. The links below open in a new window. Newer ones are on top. American Vs. International News: Time and Newsweek Why Is Art So Damned Expensive? Christmas Carols: Why do we keep singing them? Occupy D.C. distances from Democrats. Or does it? Occupy Our Homes: Shining A Light On Our Great Failure Which Side Are We On? NYT, U.S. and Cluster Bombs How Politicians’ Sex Lives Changed America’s History Radiation From Cellphones and Wi-Fi Is Making People Sick Securing Nebulous Privacy Rights in the Cloud The Personal Computer Is Dead A Floating Silicon Valley for Techies Without Green Cards Advertisement Previous item: DEA Launders Money for Mexican Drug Cartels Next item: Nominate Our Next Truthdigger of the Week New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By Outraged, December 5, 2011 at 9:43 pm Link to this comment
Re: Lafayette
Your comment: ” If the OWS movement thinks they
can build a viable third-party, they are very, very
wrong.”
I wouldn’t worry about this overly much, some will
always vote third party and most likely the Dems
never had their vote anyway. Outside of that, it’s a
long way to Nov. 2012. Right-wing trolls will be here
endorsing third party green votes to undermine
Obama. But again, the boards were riddled with their
nonsense in 2008 and it didn’t work.
The problem in 2010 was the showing at the polls, but
this is why the Repugs are attempting to violate law
and deny people their vote, literally.
The Repugs, tea party or not, have clearly shown they are stooges for the rich,
without regard for anyone else. I agree with you, the
Dems is the ONLY answer… retake our party.
I look at it this way, after the election (2012) Obama
doesn’t need to kowtow to anyone. They’ll (big money)
place their bets of course, and they know their line-
up sucks, so they’ll also throw money Obama’s way as a last ditch pitch for their cause. They did this when they made contributions to Nader (2004), undermining the Dems. They’ll do it again, it’s all but guaranteed.
Fact is, they’re screwed if Obama’s elected and they know it.
Report thisThat’s why they’ve been working, since Obama has been elected to make him “a one term President”.
By felicity, December 5, 2011 at 9:38 am Link to this comment
Lafayette - I know they’re ‘big’ ideas but the
electorate needs to understand the GOP. The so-
called Right represents the America of fear, a false
reading of the past and the present - manifested by
envy, intolerance, ungenerousity and false
patriotism. Who’s going to shout it from the
housetops but the Left.
(And then there’s the American media. TV has the
Report thiscapacity (and uses it in spades) to distract, delude,
amuse and insulate. And who better to carry out the
‘mission’ but would-be actors, not journalists. No
self-respecting journalist would allow
himself/herself to be connected with TV’s so-called
news programs.)
By Lafayette, December 5, 2011 at 12:17 am Link to this comment
A PROGRESSIVE AGENCDA
This is a great shame. If the OWS movement thinks they can build a viable third-party, they are very, very wrong.
That is not the way our political system of Money Messaging, Redistricting and Winner-take-all voting works. Which is an intricate and complex process to maintain the political status-quo.
It would be far, far easier to co-opt the present Democrat Party, which has numerous “progressive politicians” and upon that base to change it. Progressive Politics is anathema to the Rabid Right, so allow the troglodytes there to shamefully self-destruct.
Reformation of the Dem-Party is a long-term success and cannot happen overnight. If the OWS movement wants a QuickFix (to a monstrously complex problem) that will effect the outcome of the November elections, then they are moving in the direction of the “also ran” party.
Just ask Ralph Nader or look at any other movement that tried to do so in recent history.
This time is different? No, it isn’t. The level of outrage and indignation IS different - but the political dynamic that decides elections hasn’t changed. The Right will vote Right and the Left will vote Left and the middle will switch in either direction to make the victor.
(Not to mention the shameful way voters stay at home. A large voter turnout helps the Left more than the Right.)
It is that swing vote in the middle that must be addressed with the right arguments. And that is not happening today. Nowhere is there a coalescence around a Progressive Agenda that describes what policies are necessary to reform America. (Especially addressing America’s Number One priority, which is to correct the glaring Income/Wealth Disparity by means of taxation policy.)
And that is what we, the sheeple, need to see clearly expressed in a party’s platform.
Report this