|
|||
|
American Guns Stopped at the BorderPosted on Jun 2, 2010
Much has been made about Mexico’s deadly drug war and the potential for violence to spill across the border, but it is less often reported that American guns make that war go. Over the weekend, police in Laredo, Texas, seized 147 AK-47 rifles and 10,000 rounds of ammunition en route to Mexico.
Advertisement New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By PatrickHenry, June 28, 2010 at 12:06 pm Link to this comment
Ron, If you have a class 3 license you too can own an automatic weapon if your backround is clean.
You will have to pay a shitload of special taxes and have a significant gun safe able to pass a physical security evaluation. Buy a silencer for it too.
Report thisBy Ron, June 26, 2010 at 3:17 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“American Guns”? America does not make the ak-47. “With Bayonets”? Those are military assault rifles, more than likely full auto which we cannot sell in the US. If you broke that weopon down, i’m pretty sure you would find a sear and a disconnector inside…those are the parts that make a rifle fully auto.
Report thisBy bogi666, June 4, 2010 at 3:19 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Dear Gerard, it’s satire and I used bare on purpose becasue how do you know their isn’t a misspelling. Were you their. You see Gerard it’s like so. Guns are smuggled into Mexico from the USA,which is profitable for the arms manufacturers. Then, suppose the same manufacturers lobby congress to arm the Mexican government to provide them with arms to protect themselves from the arms the arms manufacturers provided that were smuggled into Mexico. You see, this is like WW1 when the bankers financed both sides of the war. A side note, Lenin then defaulted on the bonds that were used by the Czar to finance Russia. Because Lenin defaulted, Russia was excluded from the international banking system and had to develop an independent banking system. In fact, just within the last 10 years Russia paid back some of those bonds. This was the primary reason that the USSR was turned into the great bogeyman, not all the other propaganda we in the USA were fed for all those decades. Everyone knew since 1921 when the Poles soundly defeated the Soviet army that the USSR wasn’t going to take over the world, except for Ronald Reagan. Ecept for a brief period after WW2 the USSR wasn’t an threat,Ameican mindlessness propaganda, the inability to discern thoughts from facts, created the thought and Ameicans construed the thought of others into fact. FYI, Mahatma Ghandi was opposed to gun control although he never used it.
Report thisBy ofersince72, June 3, 2010 at 8:55 pm Link to this comment
The concept is
Keep America talking about Mexican immigration,
Mexican drug wars.
keep Mexica destabilized
then when , the Mexican gov asks the U.S. for military
assistance, it will be publicly acceptable.
Then when we do that, the Mexican gov will sell
Report thisthe Nationalized Oil to American Oil companies.
That is what all this is about….
Always, always, with american policy think oil
and you won’t go wrong.
All the rest is a media sideshow to get the public
educated their way…....that is your border publicity
immigration, drug wars et al.
P.S. they aren’t really drug wars down there,
they are economic wars, just keep listening to your main
stream media liberal mindless.
By Beltwaylaid, June 3, 2010 at 6:57 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The gun, Goldman-Sachs and Exxon-Mobil…. three
Report this‘symbols’ that pretty much define the American Empire.
By bEHOLD_tHE_mATRIX, June 3, 2010 at 6:52 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
By jacksonyello, June 3 at 6:37 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
“Transparent ploy by the gun grabbers. It’s a fake
problem. The real question is why do so many in the
government fear the people?”
Best laugh I’ve had all day. Go to Europe if you want
Report thisto see governments who fear their people.
By squeaky jones, June 3, 2010 at 6:46 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
And Obama says hell no to marijuana; however, Obama says hell yes to dropping bombs on people who can not defend themselves. What a country, U.S.of A. Squeaky.
Report thisBy gerard, June 3, 2010 at 3:10 pm Link to this comment
May I suggest that the 2nd Amendment is not about the “right to bare arms.” It is about the “right to bear arms,” which means to carry arms. Bare arms and legs and other body parts are not addressed in the 2nd Amendment so far as I know.
Report thisMules are trained to bear human beings along dangerous trails down into the Canyon. Bears are not involved in this enterprise, however. There are barely enough bears to eat all the garbage left by campers in Yellowstone, not to mention other national parks.
(Incidentally, I cannot bear people who insist upon bearing arms. I am in favor of strict gun control._
Bear with me—I’m on a roll here!
“To bear” is a verb, meaning to carry. The past tense is “bore” and the past participle is “borne.”
(I hope I am not boring you.)
“To bare” is also a verb, meaning to remove any covering, naked, without clothes. The past tense is “bared” and the past participle is “bared.”
“Barely” is an advert meaning “scarcely,”
“hardly.” Adverbs modify verbs. “I can barely tolerate bad English.”
My understanding is that, if you walk the streets bearing a bare gun, whether it is a gun for shooting bears or not, you are disobeying the law and can be arrested in most civilized places.
I hope I have made myself clear.
By jacksonyello, June 3, 2010 at 1:37 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Transparent ploy by the gun grabbers. It’s a fake problem. The real question is why do so many in the government fear the people?
Report thisBy Jimnp72, June 3, 2010 at 8:59 am Link to this comment
gerard,
legalization just makes too much sense. besides, what would happen to our
privatized prison industry?
Here in Pa, the nra stickers abound on the back of the pickup trucks. it is still a
deeply conservative state. but with the real estate developers writing the land
use regulations here, the floodgates have been opened to arrivees from NJ,
Ohio, etc. this has diluted the conservatism somewhat. actually conservatism is
a rather mild word for a lot of people here.
Here is pa, in terms of guns, most anything goes. ak-47’s remain perfectly
Report thislegal, and we cannot seem to even put a tiny regulation in place limiting
purchase to one firearm a month. I think those that need to buy more are
either selling them on the black market or are eating them.
By whatacrock, June 3, 2010 at 5:13 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
What a crock of hooey. This claim is a red herring used to attack the 2nd A. With the kind of money the drug trade brings, Mexican gangs would have guns regardless of any U.S. policy.
Report thisBy bogi666, June 3, 2010 at 4:11 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
This intercept is a violation of the 2nd amendment, the right to bare arms. These arms were destined to the Mexican drug gangs and their intercept means that the U.S. arms manufacturers will be deprived of gun sales, paid for by the USG American tax monies, that would be required by the Mexican government to protect themselves from the weapons smuggled into Mexico from the USA. In fact, constitutionally, this is a double violation by confiscating the guns in the 1st place and depriving the arms manufacturers of selling the weapons, paid for by the American taxpayers, to the Mexican government even though those guns may be sold to the drug gangs. This is against the Right to Bare Arms.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, June 3, 2010 at 2:46 am Link to this comment
Its nice to know that we can still export something.
Report thisBy CaptRon, June 2, 2010 at 10:06 pm Link to this comment
Can’t keep turning our heads to gun control. We get all over the Oil companies, etc., and yet we allow guns to be made-sold-and put in the hands of those who shouldn’t have them. That seems to be OK. I’m tired of seeing and hearing about kids (adolescents) shooting and killing because they had the guns to do it. Control can be done. The answer is probably easier than we think because we choose not to think. Start by making possession of the weapons, just possession of them, more serious than the crime they could commit with them. The punishment adds onto any crime committed with them not instead of. Right to arms for protection can still be OK, but the guns can’t be removed from the home they protect. Things like what was written about in this article should not happen, and when caught they should pay a very very high price. We must get crimes attention before we can diminish it or why try? No special privilege for relatives or friends just because. Do the crime do the time-everybody. Beats caning.
Report thisBy Bongocongo, June 2, 2010 at 8:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
If they are AK-47’s then they really aren’t “American guns” are they?
Report thisBy gerard, June 2, 2010 at 7:45 pm Link to this comment
De-criminalize drugs, supervise production and
sales, tax buyers and sellers highly at all points of sale, and use the money to help raise the standard of living of the ordinary Mexican family, and help Mexico to create work for their unemployed, thus decreasing the necessity of underpaid, underemployed people to come to the U.S. for work illegally. (Encourage the Catholic Church to advocate birth ccontrol in the interests of the survival of the human race.)
Yeah, right! It isn’t that we don’t know what to do, but that we don’t have the courage, interest, intelligence to even try to do it. That’s why we have so many problems.
Report this