|
|
June 18, 2013
|
|
Bomber in Attack on CIA Reportedly Courted as InformantPosted on Jan 3, 2010
According to a BBC report, intelligence sources say that the suicide bomber who managed to enter a military base and kill seven CIA agents in the Khost province of Afghanistan was courted by the U.S. as a possible informant. —JCL
Advertisement Previous item: Closing Time in Yemen Next item: Airports to Get Tougher Screening in Aftermath of Christmas Attack New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Blackspeare, January 4, 2010 at 11:32 am Link to this comment
This is the stuff of spy novels. Apparently the suicide bomber was a double agent who cleverly got the attention of CIA operatives in Afghanistan. It appears that these CIA operatives have about the same IQ as the TSA agents at Newark Airport! As Eloise Hawking said, “God save us all!”
Report thisBy DieDaily, January 3, 2010 at 11:42 pm Link to this comment
They’ll stop when we get out of their business. I don’t really understand how fighting off an occupying army could ever be considered terrorism. Every person of courage in the US would do whatever it took to get a hypothetical invading Afghani army off our streets, and their drones out of our skies. Is this not a fact? If foreigners came to our land, and massively outgunned us, and bombed every one of our power and water plants first thing, then killed tens of thousands of civilians, then installed a drug-dealing oil-puppet government (OK, scratch that, we already have that) would we not fight? But ohhh nooo, we’re not allowed to think about that. They’re brown, so they’re not people, so we can kill them at will in their homes and villages. And if they strike back, then that must be terrorism so we can kill them even more.
Report thisBy rollzone, January 3, 2010 at 10:41 pm Link to this comment
hello. very idiotic building trust with someone you have not first garnered respect. procedural protocol must be security first. first they are all enemies. in spy vs. spy it is not astonishing to consider the enemy has spies amongst you; or is at least aware of your activities. this was a careless loss at an outpost that should never have happened. whose idea was it to make these traitorous informants friends first? i pray this despicable shot in the foot does not happen again.
Report thisBy Caro, January 3, 2010 at 3:18 pm Link to this comment
It’s past time for the U.S. to put its war criminal
former president and vice president on trial.
Carolyn Kay
Report thisMakeThemAccountable.com