You think that is bad?
Wait until one of the few wide-awake Congresspersons discovers a
bill the kenyan tries to sneak thru, using US Taxpayer money to
cover the “oil revenue losses” caused by the BP sabotage. Just wait,
the queen and her Bilbderberger associates will order it in the next
few days.

Even worse, will be when his string-pullers, the israeli-dictator-types
who steered him into office and committed the piracy on the high
seas a few days ago, tell him they want the cost of their piracy
action to be paid by US Taxpayers. . . .

SteveL - the most cogent comment of the bunch.

oNooo’s comment is a masterpiece of ambiguity!

Example:  What does “this” mean in this context?
Example:  What does “long term” mean?
Example:  What does “solution” mean?
Example:  What does “available” mean?
And of course, what does “think” mean in this context?

I think this is the only long term solution available.

Come on guys. Don’t you feel better knowing that there will be ‘increased inspections’? Maybe they will hire those same incompetents who inspect our food supply. Just think of all the infections from spinach, lettuce, and peanut butter they prevent.

Better yet, they could grab a few of the Homeland Security experts who keep our borders safe from guys with bombs in their panties, waving 3 or 4 red flags as they board the plane. Yep, the whole idea that the bureaucracy will grow while the multitude of species living in the Gulf of Mexico die, has a certain symmetry to it.

Poetry thru ineptitude and incompetency: enhanced by greed and moral turpitude. The Government ‘of the people, by the the people, etc’, just gets better and better. It helps that the Supreme Court of Capitalistic Bastards defined corporations as persons, otherwise the ‘people’ might decide they are getting screwed - AGAIN!

Say it isn’t so!  Incredible!  Goes against all reason—or is it that the government of the U.S.  thinks they are “too big to fail” and “public relations” is an unnecessary evil?  I’d like to think that it’s just bureaucratic muddling—but no.  Can’t be.  The only logical explanation is—they simply don’t care.
  No doubt the explanation will be that it’s “in order to increase the future supply and keep the price of gas down within reason during the coming year or two or three, because, due to the BP “accident”, the price of gas is bound to rise sky high. It’s just a step to “protect the consumer” and (oh yes, of course) to “make us less dependent on foreign oil” and “keep our nation secure.” 
  When will this outrageous nonsense cease?  More is being spilled than just oil.

What’s you are seeing here is where corporations run the show no matter who is
in office.

Judas H. Priest! The Obama is one colossal and bitter disappointment. More
drilling offshore in the Gulf? Are they freaking barking mad?

A working shut off valve and a relief well this time?  Doubt it that would make too
much sense.