State officials say that federal nose-counters overlooked 1.5 million California residents in the 2010 census, a mistake that could ultimately cost the state billions of dollars in federal money over the next 10 years and even a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. —JCL
Los Angeles Times:
California officials estimate that the U.S. Census Bureau failed to count 1.5 million of the state’s residents, a discrepancy that if true could cost the state billions of dollars in federal aid over the next decade and perhaps an increase in its representation in Congress.
On Tuesday, the Census Bureau released national and state population figures that declared California to have 37.3 million residents, 10% more than in 2000. That growth — based on mailed-in surveys and door-to-door interviews by census takers — roughly mirrored the nation’s, but meant that for the first time since California became a state in 1850 it did not grow enough to add another member to its congressional delegation.
But according to the state Department of Finance, the state’s population was 38.8 million on July 1. That figure is drawn from birth and death statistics, school-enrollment data, driver’s license address changes, tax returns and Medicare enrollment, a set of data points that provides a “more refined” picture of the population, according to H.D. Palmer, a finance department spokesman.
We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.
In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.
Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.
Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.
Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.
Don’t we get these dog-bites-man stories every ten years? Somebody’s going to miss out on their precious government handout. Talk about greed! Given the fact that conservatives were encouraged by the Limbaugh crowd to avoid the census takers, then the bulk of the “uncounted” are probably conservatives, thus don’t deserve the money, and on principle, probably wouldn’t take it if it was offered to them. No biggy.
By rico, suave, December 24, 2010 at 5:16 pm Link to this comment
Don’t we get these dog-bites-man stories every ten years? Somebody’s going to miss out on their precious government handout. Talk about greed! Given the fact that conservatives were encouraged by the Limbaugh crowd to avoid the census takers, then the bulk of the “uncounted” are probably conservatives, thus don’t deserve the money, and on principle, probably wouldn’t take it if it was offered to them. No biggy.
Report this