Surprise! Paulson Sneaked $150B Bank ‘Windfall’ Into Bailout
Posted on Nov 10, 2008
 |
| AP photo / Lauren Victoria Burke |
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson faces the window in the office of House Republican Leader John Boehner during after-dark negotiations on Capitol Hill in late September about the plan to bail out U.S. financial markets.
|
Perhaps we should be more surprised than we are by the news that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and his DOT crew managed to sneak a handful of sentences into the approved bailout bill that amounted to a $150-billion “quiet windfall” for American banks, as The Washington Post put it. Some tax experts are saying that the move not only seems shady, but it may also be illegal.
As Congress and the country were still reeling over the multiple implosions on Wall Street this fall, Paulson attempted to include a clause in his initial bailout proposal that would have made his pursuant actions “non-reviewable” by Congress or “any court of law.” Perhaps now we know why.
Washington Post:
The sweeping change to two decades of tax policy escaped the notice of lawmakers for several days, as they remained consumed with the controversial bailout bill. When they found out, some legislators were furious. Some congressional staff members have privately concluded that the notice was illegal. But they have worried that saying so publicly could unravel several recent bank mergers made possible by the change and send the economy into an even deeper tailspin.
“Did the Treasury Department have the authority to do this? I think almost every tax expert would agree that the answer is no,” said George K. Yin, the former chief of staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the nonpartisan congressional authority on taxes. “They basically repealed a 22-year-old law that Congress passed as a backdoor way of providing aid to banks.”
The story of the obscure provision underscores what critics in Congress, academia and the legal profession warn are the dangers of the broad authority being exercised by Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. in addressing the financial crisis. Lawmakers are now looking at whether the new notice was introduced to benefit specific banks, as well as whether it inappropriately accelerated bank takeovers.
The change to Section 382 of the tax code—a provision that limited a kind of tax shelter arising in corporate mergers—came after a two-decade effort by conservative economists and Republican administration officials to eliminate or overhaul the law, which is so little-known that even influential tax experts sometimes draw a blank at its mention. Until the financial meltdown, its opponents thought it would be nearly impossible to revamp the section because this would look like a corporate giveaway, according to lobbyists.
Read more
More Below the Ad
Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.
Previous item: Dean Is Done at DNC
Next item: Thousands of Ballots Discovered in Alaska
Elsewhere: .
Comments
Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
By WomanforPeaceSanity, November 11, 2008 at 5:22 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
There are two very easy actions for us all to take on the DownsizeDC.org website which demands that Congress READ THE BILLS and ONLY ONE ISSUE PER BILL that could help make this kind of thing not happen again. Obviously, most Congress people did not read this “little revision” in the tax code added by Con-man, Free Trader Hank Paulsen. I wish that every American would become a political activist and help really change the way “our” government does business! It is time to step up and get active on a grassroots level NOW that we may have a chance to really change things in Washington D.C. “Democracy is NOT a Spectator Sport” (MoveOn.Org motto)
Report thisBy Folktruther, November 11, 2008 at 2:46 pm #
And I was amazed that the Bushites were stealing billions of dollars in plain sight, with Dem silence and complicity. Clearly I was thinking too small.
But now we have Obiden to protect us, ho, ho ho.
Report thisBy hippy pam, November 11, 2008 at 10:27 am #
The old saying goes…“F*CK me once-SHAME on you….F*CK me twice-SHAME on me”.....The FIRST TIME AIG used bailout money for executive holidays was CRIMINAL….THIS IS THE SECOND TIME my[AND YOUR] hard earned dollars are being used for PLEASURE…ARREST THESE CEOs and STRIP THEM OF EVERYTHING….So what if their families have to live on the streets….They don’t care about me and mine…THEN LET THEM TRY TO GET BY LIKE THE REST OF US POOR SHMUCKS…..I WANT TO SEE THIS ON THE AIG CEOs RESUME WHEN HE APPLIES AT BURGER KING/McDONALDS.
Report thisBy thebeerdoctor, November 11, 2008 at 6:56 am #
The money being handed out is being burned through quicker than you-know-what through a goose. Even Maria Bartiromo wondered aloud how these too-big-to-fail firms like AIG could go through the dough so quickly. The repeal of section 382 of the treasury department tax laws, is a Wall Street wet dream 22 years in the making. As Amrit Paley points out in the article “that in a year when a company only loses money, it should be entitled to a cash refund from the government.”
Report thisSo this is their idea of free enterprise?
By P. T., November 11, 2008 at 12:09 am #
And the ruling class wonders why we hate them.
Report thisBy William in OK, November 10, 2008 at 11:42 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Ahhh W, screwing the American people till the very end. And why not, he knows the dems have no spine. Shameless!
Report thisBy Maani, November 10, 2008 at 11:09 pm #
Maybe my math is messed up, but if AIG got a total of $150 billion and the banks are getting $150 billion, doesn’t that represent almost half of the entire bailout amount? It’s gonna be pretty slim pickins’ for everyone else…
Report thisBy troublesum, November 10, 2008 at 10:46 pm #
Congress had to approve this provision and they did. This will be the first scandal of the Obama administration because he was part of the effort to keep the public from finding out about it.
Report this