LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 18, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

The History That Birthed the Tsarnaev Boys

Jerry Brown: California's Mystery Man

'The Daily Show': Stewart Slams Hypocrites Cheney and Rumsfeld

How the IRS' Nonprofit Division Got So Dysfunctional

Arctic Tundra ‘Will Turn to Forest’

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Arctic Tundra ‘Will Turn to Forest’
How the IRS’ Nonprofit Division Got So Dysfunctional
Recurring Nightmares? Wake Up and Take Action

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Bill Clinton Urges Senate Dems to Support Health Care Reform

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Nov 10, 2009
Bill Clinton
Flickr / Photo Mojo

Arguing that “the worst thing to do is nothing,” former President Bill Clinton rounded up Senate Democrats for a talking-to about their upcoming vote on the health care reform legislation passed by the House of Representatives last weekend. Clinton emphasized the need for action and reminded his audience that “there is no perfect bill.”  —KA

The Washington Post:

“People trust him,” said Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., one of the architects of the current Senate health care bill.

“His argument was that getting the best bill is not only good for the people, it’s the best politics,” said Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., one of a clutch of moderates who hold the fate of the legislation in their hands.

Clinton said he hoped all the senators understood his bottom line: “It’s not important to be perfect here,” he said. “It’s important to act, to move, to start the ball rolling.”

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By @CT, November 11, 2009 at 10:47 am Link to this comment

“Just as William, the stain, Clinton destroyed the women’s movement with his “Welfare Reform Act” which threw tens of thousands of single mothers into the streets and forced tens of thousands of others into the slavery of Wal-Mart like jobs, so also will Barry The Bomber’s healthcare reform continue pummeling the already staggering working-class American.

“Here we have a health care bill which will not only drive up insurance costs but will not even permit the government to negotiate with pharmaceutical companies, thereby driving up pharmaceutical costs as well! The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that only 2% of Americans will be able to participate in this plan while 33% of Americans will remain either uninsured or underinsured. The bill even was stripped of the Kucinich amendment which would have permitted states to develop their own single-payer options. Americans will now be forced to buy health care plans from private insurance corporations. Forced!” ...

Why Progressives Should Back a Filibuster of the Health Care Bill—Can Lieberman Save Single Payer?
(scroll down at link)
http://counterpunch.org/murphy11092009.html

Report this
thebeerdoctor's avatar

By thebeerdoctor, November 11, 2009 at 10:20 am Link to this comment

It is not all that puzzling that a topic about former President Clinton and health care should wander off into the vagaries of William Clinton’s rather shabby character. Since he as president, put his wife in charge of that disaster, which as I recall mainly listened to the insurance industry (how does that not sound familiar?) and did not accomplish one damn thing, why is it so urgent to heed the advice of that slippery eel now? I guess placing sanctions that caused the deaths of at least a half million Iraqi children is not about health care, but rather an international form of services denied.

Report this

By europa92103, November 11, 2009 at 10:09 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The health care bill passed does address the problem of insurance company refusals due pre conditions and has a limited public option. It is better than the status quo. That being said, it is time for the U.S. to regard health care as a right of every citizen, the same as police and fire protection. The health insurance companies profit off the misery of others. We already have in place a single payer system with only 3% administrative expense called medicare for those 65 and up. Gradually start lowering the age of eligibility and eliminate the social security wage earnings limit to pay the social security tax to pay for increased care for all.  With coverage for all companies could pay more in wages and still have money left over, even with the proposed employer/employee tax of 3.75% more than we pay now as suggested by HR676. Yes,there will be a rush to catch up on medical care not used due not being able to afford same once single payer can kick in but it is the only real solution. It would still be privately administered where you choose your health care provider but instead of several people in the medical officer pushing paper with multiple insurance companies, fighting denials, getting approvals, etc we would all benefit with single payer. As for the greedy insurance companies, they would have to disband regular coverage and close up except for cosmetic stuff and add ons but they have ripped us off long enough and when HR676/S703 and/or medicare for all is passed, money could be appropriated to buy out the insurance companies at a reasonable cost with the government (which is really we the people) taking care of our health coverage jsut as they do our police and fire protection.

Report this
Hulk2008's avatar

By Hulk2008, November 11, 2009 at 10:07 am Link to this comment

I’m puzzled.  All these vagaries about Obama and Afghanistan and Clinton v. Hussein.  Here and I thought the article was about pushing health care reform a few inches forward. 
    I voted for Billy and Herman Munster and O and I would do it again in a heartbeat in spite of Monica or Rev. Wright or even the horrid days of Newt.  The alternatives were just NOT there.  Kooky Perot, more Bush The First, Cowboy W, bomb-bomb-bomb-McCain, not to mention all the other potential candidates at those times - summed up as the 7 Dwarves plus 20. 
  The facts indicate Bill was effective and persuasive and actually brought down debt and increased per capita income even in the middle class and has personal ties to most of current-day political types - even his erstwhile enemies. 
  Only the communists in the 50’s proposed their “Great Leap Forward” ideas and their doomed 5 year plans.  The rest of the world moves ahead by inch-pebbles, not milestones.  Any boost toward the goal line is appreciated - from ANY source, regardless how sordid. 
  Clinton reportedly advised the Senators to make the health care plans better - not just to pass along the clanking monolith the House proposed. 
  Why should the CEO of Wellpoint make 40 times the income of the top surgeon in the US?  Why should the spouses of Senators make millions on corporate boards of pharmaceutical companies and health insurers while average workers suffer 10% unemployment.
  If it takes Bill Clinton, or a song by George Clinton, to advance US health care, so be it.

Report this
thebeerdoctor's avatar

By thebeerdoctor, November 11, 2009 at 5:48 am Link to this comment

tropicgirl: now tell us what you really think.
Former President Clinton’s “stature” can best be witnessed in that infamous interview with Democracy Now!‘s Amy Goodman, where he blamed his policy of sanctions against Iraq that killed at least a million children (what Sec. of State Albright claimed was “worth it”) all on the brutal dictator Saddam Hussein, who simply did not share his great wealth and caused the catastrophe. Psychological historians will listen to that recording in the future, and marvel at what a classic example of denial combined with irrational anger is displayed by the former U.S. President whose stature I am told, seems to know no bounds.

Report this

By johncp, November 11, 2009 at 4:18 am Link to this comment

All the right wing half-wits see this as another opportunity to bring Clinton down.  But, he doesn’t fall, his stature grows with each attack.

Report this

By idarad, November 10, 2009 at 8:54 pm Link to this comment

Bill -
Go Home Shut up and play…...
You’re not the only reason we’re in the mess we’re in, but you should did your
best to keep the road paved with blood.

Report this
Samson's avatar

By Samson, November 10, 2009 at 8:15 pm Link to this comment

Wow, Mister corporate-Dem himself says we must all leap forward and support this “Bailout with a blue cross”.

Let me guess.  Ole Bill also probably just got a $4 million speaking engagement at the next convention of the health insurance industry.

I’m so freaking impressed.  Of course, I was so freakin’ impressed by all of the corporate Bill years, and his selling of the Lincoln bedroom and the rest of the US government that I went and worked for the Nader campaign.

Personally, I wish Bill had spent more time with Monica, thus leaving less time in his day to sell our America to the corporations.

Yuck!

Report this

By @CT, November 10, 2009 at 4:10 pm Link to this comment

Ah, jeez. Bill Clinton—sooo unimaginative he gave “Leaves of Grass” both to his wife AND to his girlfriend—is counseling that “the worst thing to do is nothing”? It’s more important to most people that the former Democrats not get away with this mandatory-insurance scam than that Obama collect another “win” ...

People who know more about the medical end of it disagree with Wild Bill:

Marcia Angell, M. D., Senior Lecturer in the Department of Social Medicine at Harvard Medical School, former Editor-in-Chief of the New England Journal of Medicine:
Is the House Health Care Bill Better than Nothing?
“Is the House bill better than nothing? I don’t think so. It simply throws more money into a dysfunctional and unsustainable system, with only a few improvements at the edges, and it augments the central role of the investor-owned insurance industry. The danger is that as costs continue to rise and coverage becomes less comprehensive, people will conclude that we’ve tried health reform and it didn’t work. But the real problem will be that we didn’t really try it. I would rather see us do nothing now, and have a better chance of trying again later and then doing it right.”
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/11/09-5

See also: http://www.guaranteedhealthcare.org/blog/john-geyman-md-pnhp/2009/11/05/health-care-reform-2009-no-bill-is-better-than-a-bad-bill

Report this

By tropicgirl, November 10, 2009 at 3:04 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

And here we have another p i s s stream jumping on the bandwagon.

Clinton’s butt is so worn out that it shows in his face.

Obama is a blue dog warmongerer… He is interested in nothing but his own
political career, has no faith in what is right, is not interested in change, runs
from it…

He kills women, children, fathers, sons, ANONYMOUSLY, with drone bombers,
administered by kids from Idaho or somewhere, who think they are playing
video games…

Obama will run over the Afghans like America ran over the American Indians, if
given the chance. He does not view them as people, does not appreciate what it
is to be a native culture, and has been totally contaminated by a sick culture of
greed and ignorance…

If Obama was around in the 1800’s he would have turned the other way, or
participated in, the extermination of our native Americans. He is totally hope-
LESS as a human being. He has a big fat stupid mouth that operates on auto-
pilot with outdated fake quasi-liberal views, while perpetuating the theft of
American tax dollars and the protection of those who steal money and jobs
from the American family…

Clinton and his rich wannabees (including the incompetent Hillaryshill) are the
disgusting bottom of politics

Why does Obama hate native peoples so much?..

Why does Obama hate the America people so much? That cold, fake fish…

He is ready to order a death march through Afghanstan…

And Clinton, go suck something. You know that is what you care about most.
Yourself. You are a cancer on the American people and you know it.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.