The White House sounded a triumphant note Friday about the success of the economic stimulus in salvaging and creating close to 650,000 jobs in recent months, but some Republicans, along with the AP, are questioning the accuracy of the government’s figures. —KA
The Associated Press via Google News:
New job numbers from businesses, contractors, state and local governments, nonprofit groups and universities were released, showing 640,329 positions credited to the stimulus, according to the independent federal board monitoring the program’s progress.
Teachers and other education employees represent the largest number of jobs in the report — about 325,000. With state budgets in crisis, federal aid helped governors avoid major cuts in education, which officials said spared many teachers and school workers from the unemployment line.
But Republican Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, voicing the skepticism of many critics, has warned about putting too much stock in claims that the stimulus saved that many jobs. Chris Johnston, who oversees Indiana’s stimulus spending for Daniels, said Friday the state reported under the stimulus requirements that 13,000 teaching jobs were created or saved. But he’s not sure whether any of those people actually would have been laid off.
[...] The new stimulus report follows the administration’s admission that earlier counts of jobs credited to the stimulus were faulty. A review by the Associated Press found the government’s early report overstated thousands of jobs saved or created.
Despite White House promises that errors would be corrected, the latest stimulus job count still includes mistakes such as the ones discovered in the AP’s earlier sampling of contracts.
Read more
By peter, November 3, 2009 at 4:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
View the change in Indiana Unemployment Trends over the
Report thislast six months using Heat Maps:
Indiana Unemployment this month (BLS data):
http://www.localetrends.com/st/in_indiana_unemployment.
php?MAP_TYPE=curr_ue
versus Indiana Unemployment levels siz months ago:
http://www.localetrends.com/st/in_indiana_unemployment.
php?MAP_TYPE=m12_ue
By DaveZx3, November 1, 2009 at 12:16 pm Link to this comment
I was ignoring this story, because it reeks of bullshit, but decided to look it over anyway because the New England Patriots are on a bye, and the weather is not too great. Much to my absolute surprise, I get to totally agree with ardee.
It is a total sham to even whisper the word recovery when 10% of the country is unemployed. And as we all know that is only the survivors. How many ran out of benefits and any hope. How many don’t even get benefits, like my neighbor’s daughter who got laid off from a non-profit day care center. Sorry, No benefits. Go on welfare, get food stamps, move in with your parents. At least she had parents to move in with.
It is inexcusable for large amounts of money to be flowing back to the greed sector when so many families are scrambling for food with no hint of how they are going to pay heating bills when the winter turns out as cold as expected.
I am not a liberal and don’t believe in free handouts, but when your government and your business sector slam the door on your livelyhood, out of their ignorance, incompetence and greed, it may be time for some real tea parties. The kind where you dump politicians in the harbor.
Report thisBy ardee, October 31, 2009 at 5:44 am Link to this comment
Does the article seem to imply that “saved” jobs are considered “created “jobs?
Last week over half a million new applicants applied for unemployment insurance, that really says it all. We are seeing a jobless recovery, one that benefits only the wealthiest….Nice job Barack. I guess we can put many of our unemployed into uniforms, open new fronts and thus make our stats look so much better….
Report this