![]() |
![]() |
||
|
Don’t Ruin the Public Option for Everyone Else, ArkansasPosted on Oct 22, 2009
While the House is chugging along with what’s shaping up to be a strong public option, the Senate has come up with a compromise that might make room for government insurance. Essentially, states that don’t dig government-run health care wouldn’t have to have it. There’s strength in numbers, but letting states opt out if they don’t appreciate government competition is certainly preferable to the “trigger,” which would have the public option come into effect only when certain criteria were met, i.e. never. Another cause for concern is the compromise’s sponsor, Sen. Charles Schumer, who happens to be among the busiest bees in the health industry’s honeypot this cycle. Forgive us our skepticism. There’s a lot to like about what Schumer has been putting down, but the man has a history of delivering for his back-scratchers, the financial industry chief among them. —PZS
Advertisement Previous item: Some Americans Won't Believe in Global Warming Until They're Actually Melting Next item: U.S. Goes After La Familia Drug Cartel Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By Shift, October 23, 2009 at 4:41 pm #
States opting out is nonsense. It would lead to a total splintering of federal policy. Could Vermont opt out of paying for the National Defense?
Let’s face reality, corporations run the show. We have Fascism not Democracy and the people mostly don’t care.
Things have not gotten bad enough for enough people for them to care yet. When it does and they become active, the U.S. Military will be used to shut them down. Democracy is dead in America and people don’t care.
It’s up to Mother Nature to correct things now, and she will!
Report thisBy Virginia from Virginia, October 23, 2009 at 2:57 pm #
First off, I’m strongly in favor of a non-profit, non-employer provided health plan. But, from the latest out of Congress, the public “option” is no option for most of us. We who already have health insurance, cannot opt for the public option.
Report thisAlso, those few who are allowed to opt for the public option may be among the sickest of us. Those opting for the publc option may include all the “rejects” from the for-profit insurance companies - those truly sick - thus causing his public option to not really be any competition to the health insurance companies but to be a boon the said companies.
The public option should be an option for us all. Let choice and competition reign.
Again, I despise ANY for-profit health plan. We know how those companies will rip us off and fail us when we need them. But I won’t get to opt for a non-profit health plan.
By omop, October 23, 2009 at 11:59 am #
Every decent, honorable and conscientious American should first and foremost
consider that ” the people that make up the USA, a government of the people by
the people and for the people are not subservient to any entity such as the
insurance industry to decide for all Americans what they have a right to”.
The “public option” provides all Americans with a more democratic and open
choice while those opposed to the “public options” want “complete and
dictatorial control” if not a monopoly over ALL Americans.
Its hard to believe that certain Senators and Congresspersons many of whom
take advantage of the American taxpayer paid health benefits consider the
money they receive from lobbyists more important than the citizens they
represent in DC.
Given the anti public option one can only compare those Senators and
Congresspeople to Judas Iscariot.
As far as Arkansas’ Senator Lincoln, she is married to a doctor and the brother
Report thisof Congressman Ross from the 4th District in Arkansas is pharmacist.
By ardee, October 23, 2009 at 6:10 am #
At the very least we seem to be seeing that the “public option” part of health care reform is difficult to kill. Despite the many millions of dollars the Insurance industry throws at this “problem” it simply refuses to go away.
I wonder if this is a sign of exactly how much the people want said option? I wonder what form this option might take? I do not wonder whether we will see real and inexpensive universal health care come out of our legislature, we wont.
Report thisBy C A Shipman, October 23, 2009 at 5:59 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Money has allways won.
Money is winning.
Money will win.
Follow the money.member79
Report thisBy C.Curtis.Dillon, October 23, 2009 at 5:04 am #
We should understand that every politician has his “honey pots” which he will defend and protect. Just sitting back to watch Barney Frank scream about health care reform but then water down the consumer protection agency bill is enough to make one understand this unpleasant truth. The system as designed by our representatives is intended to provide them with a rich stream of money for their personal use (aka campaign “war chest”). They game the system at both ends, ginning up problems which industry has to respond to with cash while telling their voting base about how they are protecting them from the evil businessmen/bankers. This crap will not end until there is some system in place that finances their campaigns and makes any contact with a lobbyist and/or corporation illegal and strongly punished. Corporations have NO PLACE in the public discourse ... despite a stupid court ruling to the contrary, a corporation is not a person. They may publicly make their positions known but they are not legally allowed to conduct private and secret dealings with our elected representatives.
Report this