LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 25, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Three Questions Left Unanswered by Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Marching in Chicago: Resisting Rahm Emanuel’s Neoliberal Savagery

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

Corporate Tax Cheats by the Numbers

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * A Cooler Century? Wait and See
New York City’s Summers May Heat Up

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

What Does the Nobel Mean for Obama?

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Oct 9, 2009
Nobel
eetd.lbl.gov

He’s not a year into his presidency yet, and when he was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize that he just won, President Barack Obama hadn’t even occupied the White House for two full weeks. So, how are we to make sense of his surprise victory? The New York Times rounded up a bunch of ... well, learned white guys to comment on Obama’s and other U.S. leaders’ Nobel nods.  —KA

The New York Times:

But the Norwegian Nobel Committee never claimed they were giving President Obama the award for his nine-month old presidency. Barack Obama, it seems, deserved the Nobel for his audacious ability to navigate the curse of racism with unparalleled integrity and high-mindedness. (Oslo, in fact, thought the same of Martin Luther King Jr. back in 1964 when the Atlanta freedom fighter won the coveted award at the age of 35.) Apparently the other deciding factor for Oslo was Mr. Obama’s high-profile promotion of international diplomacy in the traditional multilateral sense.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By sisilia, October 12, 2009 at 6:25 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Nobel peace prize is a racism bacterias attacking Pres.Obama in America History.Nobel is feeding or picking up their own favorite toys.etc.Nobel is showing off to the whole world their victory of their strong side fo hateful,disohnest,racism,disrespectful our father in heaven and our planet.In America is already time to stop the disease of racism from long long time ago. But to day America still get the racism bacterias infection from outside leaders(enemies).Nobel peace prize award is not a safety move to our President and people of America.  Examples;A lion attacked a lady,the lady shout,shot,shot,shot,the husband said I forget my camera inside the car.The husband ran back to the car to get the camera,at the same time the lion keep attacking the lady.She was rescued by the security.When Pres.Obama shout thank you,thank you,thank you Nobel peace prize.I thought he said to me,“F"u,“F"u.I truned and said,Pres.Obama you get the infection,the racism bacterias disease.“America please rescue our Pres.Obama b/c I am deaf.We testing the gold wiht fire,servants with God’s teaching.Both of these two things are facing with diffulties strong enough to have a change for the better results.and God will give you award for the best of the whole world.It is all about for the safety of people and continueing obeying our father in heaven.Keep up the good jobs.God bless Pres.Obama and God bless America.

Report this

By Lisa, October 11, 2009 at 8:03 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I think the Nobel Prize is an honor for the President and our country.  Hopefully, this means we can end the war.

Report this

By @CT, October 11, 2009 at 3:27 pm Link to this comment

oops, correction: that White House/Dole story is ALL over, including ABC http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/10/at-doles-request-white-house-tells-dnc-to-pull-health-care-reform-ad.html
“At Dole’s Request, White House Tells DNC to Pull Health Care Reform Ad”,

Report this

By @CT, October 11, 2009 at 3:16 pm Link to this comment

jeffrey writes:
“The pen is mightier than the sword, as the saying goes.  Well, in this day and age, the pen could very well stand for the broadcasted word.

“And if such is the case, Obama has had more of a positive effect than any other US government figure in my living memory.”

—> Huh?? How’s THAT? Pre-empting the airwaves more than anybody else has ever dared?

By having His White House communications underling go on teevee today to proclaim that CNN (which, just before The Prize, “fact-checked” Saturday Night Live—a COMEDY show, lest we forget, that was as responsible for His election as anything—for being less than worshipful of Der Won’s non-accomplishments) is a “news network”, while describing Fox as “almost as either the research arm or the communications arm of the Republican Party… “?

Meanwhile, the only network news (along with online news like the NYT and Politico) that’s interested in “DNC Scraps Health Care Ad at Dole’s Request” is ... Fox. Go figure.

Report this
MarthaA's avatar

By MarthaA, October 11, 2009 at 10:57 am Link to this comment

What Does the Nobel Mean for Obama?

The best way to say what the Nobel Peace Prize means to President Obama is with his own words as follows:

“That is why I’ve said that I will accept this award as a call to action, a call for all nations and all peoples to confront the common challenges of the 21st century. These challenges won’t all be met during my presidency, or even my lifetime. But I know these challenges can be met so long as it’s recognized that they will not be met by one person or one nation alone.”

“This award—and the call to action that comes with it—does not belong simply to me or my administration; it belongs to all people around the world who have fought for justice and for peace. And most of all, it belongs to you, the men and women of America, who have dared to hope and have worked so hard to make our world a little better.”

“So today we humbly recommit to the important work that we’ve begun together. I’m grateful that you’ve stood with me thus far, and I’m honored to continue our vital work in the years to come.”

“Thank you,”

“President Barack Obama”

Report this

By Jean Gerard, October 11, 2009 at 10:30 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

kdelphi:  Yeah, sure.  But Obama can’t do all that, as you surely must know. That’s our job.  The Nobel can do no more than encourage us to work with him and against the formidable forces working against him.  Peace and justice will require a spirit of cooperation, patience and wisdom for quite a long time, no doubt.

Report this

By jeffrey, October 11, 2009 at 1:03 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The pen is mightier than the sword, as the saying goes.  Well, in this day and age, the pen could very well stand for the broadcasted word.

And if such is the case, Obama has had more of a positive effect than any other US government figure in my living memory.

In so many American reactions to this occasion, both ‘progressive’ and ‘conservative,’ there seems to be a profound lack of empathy for the thoughts and opinions of the rest of the world, the other 98% of the human population.

Traveling through Hindu, Buddhist, and Muslim countries since 2006, I can tell you that yes, Obama has changed the the world for the better. 

In Delhi this July, Muslims were so happy to speak with me, an American, and the word they most frequently mentioned was “Obama.”  A few years ago, there was only cynicism.  In such communities there is real hope and excitement- the foundation upon which better societies are built.

Watching President Obama give his speech in Cairo last spring, I was reminded of George W. Bush’s words not even a month of after 9/11. “This war, this crusade…” was the way in which he described his foreign policy vision.  That one speech, those few words, concretely damaged the world.  How different were Obama’s words in Egypt, as he quoted from the Qur’an and appealed to the common goodness we all share. 

I remember a Muslim friend of mine, a Iraqi refugee, in tears of happiness that day. 

Why don’t we cast aside our cynicism and a work with a man who is willing to listen?

Report this

By Lisa, October 10, 2009 at 7:50 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I think the Nobel Prize is an honor for the President, he was very gracious about accepting it.

Report this

By Jean Gerard, October 10, 2009 at 3:14 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

K-Delphi, I think you’ll agree if I add to your drones comment—just in case somebody hasn’t thought of it like this:  Drones are one of the most despicable of weapons—the height of cowardice.  From thousands of miles away someone sits at a computer, pushes a key down and “fires” a drone missile on a wedding party or a schoolyard (by mistake, of course) several thousand miles away.  It’s doubtful if he sees anything more than a cloud of dust.  A way of killing defenseless people without running any risk oneself and without having to look at the people you killed.  Marvelous scientific invention, a great tribute to the brave armies of the world’s richest country. Yet this is currently the “weapon of choice” for Af/Pak.

Report this

By KDelphi, October 10, 2009 at 12:53 pm Link to this comment

Jean Gerard—Ok, I acknowledge it.

And I’ll acknowledge Obama’s legitimacy to the Nobel prize when the people in this country have a norwegian style social safety net and arent dying in the streets to pay for a corporate war that Obama seems to want to kick down the road.

I wonder how many people could be kept in their homes with the money spent on drones.

Report this

By @CT, October 10, 2009 at 10:07 am Link to this comment

PSmith writes:
“2. The Nobel Committee have just made Obama into a living saint. Which hugely raises the stakes for the fascists against him. Think Nelson Mandela being overthrown by white fascist racists in South Africa and the popular rage—and bloodbath—that would have provoked.”

Oh, pish and tosh: did the five magic Norwegians succeed in transforming Al Gore into a “living saint”—or is Gore still, as ever, widely regarded as a sissy and sycophant?

And comparing Oblabla to Mandela—which Alice Walker ridiculously did, in a burst of negritude during the primaries—is kind of like comparing Ann Coulter and Eleanor Roosevelt.

If there are “white racist fascists” about, other than His closeted corporate ennablers and a couple of teevee talking heads, maybe Oblabla’d better go to war with THEM, instead of with the Democratic masses, the Afghanis, the Iraqis, the Pakistanis, the Colombians and whoever.

As for His presuming to take the Nobel Peace Prize as a “call to action”, MOST people probably assumed that his bait-and-switch election to the presidency of the US might have sufficed for that, were he capable of it.

Report this

By Jean Gerard, October 10, 2009 at 10:01 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

In the face of mean-spirited criticism and resentment let’s acknowledge that Europeans, remembering the horrors they lived through during WWI and II, want to encourage the world that peace is not only possible, but essential.  They want to encourage Americans to pull back from our present foreign policy of “might makes right.”  They want to send a signal to us that Obama clearly offers that possibility and we have the opportunity to help him follow through.

Report this

By @CT, October 10, 2009 at 9:00 am Link to this comment

Folktruther writes:
“The Nobel Peace Prize was a consolation for losing the Olympics.”

So it seems:

“Castro said the prize made up for the blow Obama suffered last week when the International Olympic Committee awarded the 2016 Summer Games to Rio de Janeiro after Obama had flown to Copenhagen to pitch for Chicago, his adoptive hometown.”
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5991C120091010 . . .

Report this
Blackspeare's avatar

By Blackspeare, October 10, 2009 at 8:44 am Link to this comment

The Nobel Peace Prize was a consolation for losing the Olympics.  I think Obama would rather have had the Olympics——less strings attached!

Report this

By @CT, October 10, 2009 at 8:37 am Link to this comment

“Two members of the Nobel committee resigned, while the song-writer Tom Lehrer famously said that the award showed that satire had become obsolete. Perhaps showing a slightly larger capacity for shame than his counterpart, Le Duc Tho refused his share of the prize [with Henry Kissinger in 1973] on the grounds that a true peace did not yet exist.”

Norwegians who gave Obama the Nobel Prize
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/54574,news-comment,news-politics,norwegian-committee-who-anointed-obama-are-a-nobel-prize-oddity-peace

Report this

By Jim Yell, October 10, 2009 at 7:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I think that awarding the Nobel Prize to President Obama is premature and certainly ironic, when we view his leaning towards sending more troops to a meaningless war and to his apparent attempts to validate the human rights abuses of the Bush Administration and even to embracing their continued use.

Let’s face it he has been a very disappointing President for the promises that were made and then ignored, except for hollow mentions in speeches.

Still I keep hoping that inspite of what I see he has some larger view that will make sense over time, but still I think this is not who, or what we voted for.

Report this

By Leonard Tomlinson, October 10, 2009 at 5:19 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Does Obama deserve the reward?  It depends on one’s perspective.  I would say he does.  Anyone who can stand against negativism and racism of American society and continue to make postive moves in postive direction definitely deserves the reward. Let’s; does a CEO of an insurance group DESERVE a 120 plus million dollar salary???
Do pundits who constantly get things WRONG DESERVE to
be called pundits; what have THEY done lately for the good of AMERICA??

Report this
thebeerdoctor's avatar

By thebeerdoctor, October 10, 2009 at 4:16 am Link to this comment

Just for the record of realism: President Obama has not stood up to Israel. In fact he totally buys into their agenda when he starts tooting about Iran’s nuclear development. If he was an honest leader, he would acknowledge that if Iran is building nuclear weapons its because it wants a deterrent from Israel’s nuclear weapons. And just for the record of realism, Israel has never signed the International Atomic Energy protocols for any kind of inspection.
Perhaps the dairy industry is happy, because this is one of the cheesier Nobel Peace Prizes ever awarded. As Mark Twain might say: it seems rather “dubersome”.

Report this

By Walldizo, October 10, 2009 at 4:02 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

From what has been revealed until now, there is nothing encouraging in Obama’s attempt at securing peace in the Mid-East.Without reining in netanyahu’s temerity,Obama will end up in the same embarrassing situation as did his predecessors.To be worthy of such a prize, although most of its cerebral integrity has been demoted to a PR festivity,Obama’s stand must be clear and decisive in his willingnes to establishing peace. Giving up to Jwish lobbys doesn’t bode well with his promises.It gives reason to those doubting this award.

Report this

By johannes, October 10, 2009 at 3:19 am Link to this comment

Readers, politic’s is about constant lying but so that the people think its the truth, thats wy the whole world is in and stay’s in a mess.

salutation

Report this

By Folktruther, October 10, 2009 at 2:01 am Link to this comment

PatrickHenry, I believe you’ve gone bonkers.  Obama stood up to Israel?  The regime there is explicitly against a two state solution and is contuining to steal land from the Palestinians and expland settlements.  the US is now at war with three Muslim countires and threatening a fuurth.  And Obama is still funding Israel’s militarism and expansion and did not prosecute Israeli spies.

Are you against Jews and FOR Israel?  this is the right wing ideology of the White Christian right.

Report this

By UnchiNeko, October 9, 2009 at 11:09 pm Link to this comment

“he stood up to Israel and reached out to the arab world.”

is it still called “reaching out” when one has nuclear “arms?”

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, October 9, 2009 at 6:08 pm Link to this comment

Obama did something no president since Carter has done, he stood up to Israel and reached out to the arab world.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.