|
|
June 18, 2013
|
|
|
|
 Curb Your Nuclear ProliferationPosted on Sep 24, 2009
A U.N. Security Council session led by President Obama has adopted a resolution calling for nuclear disarmament, focusing largely on measures aimed at halting weapons proliferation and lowering the risk of “nuclear terrorism.”
Advertisement TAGS:
|
Bank of America Lied to Homeowners and Rewarded Foreclosures, Ex-Employees Say
Email 
Print
Share
Email to a friend
Newsletter 
Like Us
Follow Us
Get Our Feed
Tags|Bazaar|Podcast|About Us|Contact Us|User Agreement|Privacy Policy|FAQ: Comments and Moderation | Google+
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.
By Lois, September 28, 2009 at 8:28 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
When is a nuclear weapons of mass destruction not politically destabilizing?
When nuclear weapons of mass destruction is in the hands of the chosen people,
then it is the chosens’ weapons of mass destruction.
The facts are that almost any use of nuclear weapons in that small part of the
Report thisworld would poison most of the people living there and the land they once lived
on. The winds blow from east to west. A Holy Land indeed. Only mad men would
tell you there is a ‘good’ use for a weapon that kills the children of the weapon
wielder and the children of the targeted at almost the same rates, in due time.
By NZDoug, September 24, 2009 at 11:50 pm Link to this comment
Is it true that Israel has 273WMD and that they are religeous NUTZ?
Report thisBy Commune115, September 24, 2009 at 4:47 pm Link to this comment
Another example of Obama being the classic lawyer and media star, this will be good for a few, inspiring headlines and then in a few months reality will set in again.
Report thisBy Jean Gerard, September 24, 2009 at 2:38 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Number 1: Work to prevent further proliferation
Report thisNumber 2. Increase pace of US-Russia agreements on reduction of present stockpiles.
Number 3. Create incentives for other “nuclear nations” to reduce.
Number 4. Strictly enforce measures to prevent development and sale of nuclear weapons technologies and materials..
Number 5. Build international confidence in the possibiity of eventual total nuclear disarmament.
Number 6. Reduce nuclear weapons’ role as a symbol of power.
By ender, September 24, 2009 at 11:17 am Link to this comment
While I agree that we will continue to give Israel a pass since they would never willingly give up their nuclear weapons willingly at least Pres. Obama was genuine in backing down from placing the missile ‘defense’ shield in Poland. Shrub wanted to reignite the cold war with Russia so we would have to spend trillions modernizing our nuclear arsenal once Russia began to reactivate theirs in responce to the ‘shield’ on the door step.
Report thisBy skulz fontaine, September 24, 2009 at 10:56 am Link to this comment
“...measures aimed at halting weapons proliferation and lowering the risk of
Report this“nuclear terrorism.” Right. Is this to include India? Pakistan? Israel? South Africa?
Smoke and mirrors with a touch of hypocrisy on a grand scale.
By Folktruther, September 24, 2009 at 10:27 am Link to this comment
Obama’s political trademark appears to be inspiring duplicity. As he well knows, US policy is the greatest instrument of the spread of nuclear weapons. By threatening the invasion of small couontries, it encourages them to obtain nuclear weapons to deter the threat. And the US nuclear arsenal is by far the deadliest in the world. The pentagon is constantly thinking of ways to blur the distinction between nuclear weapons and conventional weapons.
Obama’s policy, contining Bush’s, is to prevent adveraries from getting nucluer weapons while spreading them to their allies, notably Israel. Although this largely deceives the American people, it does not deceive the world’s people. the increasingly undeerstand the threat from the US homicdal plutcoracy. And Obama’s inspiring duplicity.
Report this