LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 12, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Frightening Charts From the Senate Inequality Hearing

Morris Berman and the Decline of America

Perfection

Critical, Reluctant and Desperate

Will Mortgage Settlement Avoid Repeating Obama’s Foreclosure Failures?

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Political Divide

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Twelve More Years?

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Share
Posted on Sep 11, 2009
Putin
AP pool / Alexei Druzhinin

Get used to it: Vladimir Putin isn’t going anywhere.

Superexecutive Vladimir Putin has strongly suggested that he plans to become president of Russia once again after his term as prime minister expires in 2012. That prospect and the current power-sharing deal between Putin and now-President Dmitry Medvedev has some talking about a “democratic deficit” in Moscow.

The Guardian:

Speaking to a group of scholars and international journalists, Putin said that he and his successor, Dmitry Medvedev, would take a joint decision over which one of them would hold the post next. Putin stepped down as president in 2008, becoming Russia’s prime minister, installing Medvedev in his place.

“Was there any competition in 2007? No. Then we won’t have this in 2012,” Putin said. Smiling broadly, he added: “We will agree because we are people of one stamp. We will take all these things into account and then decide.”

His comments raise the prospect that the Putin era—which began in 2000—could extend for at least another decade. Under Russia’s new constitution the next president is entitled to stay in power for two more six-year terms, raising the prospect that Putin could still be in the Kremlin in 2024 – aged 72.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By yours truly, September 11, 2009 at 6:14 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Our own “democratic deficit” surely matches Russia’s, what with President Obama & Congress dumping single payer (even in the form of a watered-down public option) despite polls consistantly showing that two-thirds of the public is for it, not to mention ex-president & mass-murderer George W. Bush’s lying us into his blood for oil Iraq War even though the public (worldwide, not just in America) was strongly agin it.  As far as our leaders are concerned, democracy has nothing to do with popular will, it’s whether a nation, in the words of G.W.B. II, is “With us or against us.”  Which makes Saudi Arabia, our staunch Mideast ally (even though most of the 9/11 perpetrators were Saudis), no matter Saudi women aren’t even allowed to drive, stoning to death & beheadings are official punishments, and with slavery having been abandoned only a decade or so ago, but who knows for sure.

Report this

By Commune115, September 11, 2009 at 11:03 am Link to this comment

Why do we always raise our hands or shout when leaders like Putin make power grab moves? We conveniently ignore our allies like Egypt’s Mubarak who’s been in power for two decades and is a horrendous human rights violator, or Colombia’s right-wing thug Alvaro Uribe, who is pushing hard to change the constitution so he can run for a third term. We always aim for the same batch of punching bags, Putin, Chavez etc.

Report this

By I.G. Noble, September 11, 2009 at 10:42 am Link to this comment

Well, Putin’s will give NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg a record to shoot for.

Report this
Russian Paul's avatar

By Russian Paul, September 11, 2009 at 10:30 am Link to this comment

As someone who constantly defends Russia from propagandistic attacks from the
West, I must admit Putin’s power hogging is unfortunate. And the elections there
are a joke, as they are almost allwhere.
But maybe, in a way, you could say that in Russia, the monopoly of power is at
least out in the open. where in the US, many still believe Obama represents
genuine change while in reality, the same corporate interests run the show no
matter what face we see.

Report this

By Robert Mendez, September 11, 2009 at 10:10 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The idea of a “democracy deficit” implies a democracy exists, but what is as clear in Russia, as it is in Peoria, neither the U.S. nor Russia has the makings of a real democracy.  Call it a plutocracy, or better a kleptocracy, but to suggest that any degree of organization is ordained by the people of either population, and that they people have a say in what happens, is tripe.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.