Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
April 23, 2017 Disclaimer: Please read.

Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.

Truthdig Bazaar more items

Ear to the Ground
Email this item Print this item

Top U.S. General Calls for Strategy Change in Afghanistan

Posted on Aug 31, 2009
Obama and McChrystal
White House / Pete Souza

White House huddle: President Barack Obama meets in May with Army Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal in the Oval Office.

General Stanley McChrystal, the top-ranking U.S. military commander in Afghanistan, on Monday issued his highly anticipated report about the status of the conflict on that troubled front, and his assessment of the situation doesn’t fully help President Obama’s cause in ramping up America’s Afghan war effort since he took office.  —KA


Gen McChrystal’s blunt assessment will say that the Afghan people are undergoing a crisis of confidence because the war against the Taliban has not made their lives better, says BBC North America editor Mark Mardell.

The general says the aim should be for Afghan forces to take the lead - but their army will not be ready to do that for three years and it will take much longer for the police. And he will warn that villages have to be taken from the Taliban and held, not merely taken.

Responding to Gen McChrystal’s review, Afghanistan’s deputy minister of rural rehabilitation, Wais Barmak, said Afghans should have been consulted about military strategy from the start.

Read more

Taboola Below Article
Get a book from one of our contributors in the Truthdig Bazaar.

Related Entries

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every day.

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Join the conversation

Load Comments

By jacob jones, September 1, 2009 at 2:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I love Obama he’s the best and I don’t think no one should talk any more smack about him or else surfer the consequences of being sent to hell for eternity.

Report this

By the worm, September 1, 2009 at 7:32 am Link to this comment

Many of us who supported Obama’s election believed he had enough sense to not
re-engage in a war that was lost eight years ago when the Bush administration
diverted troops to its Iraq misadventure.  Now, to the Bush/Obama multi-trillion
dollar bail-out of the financial industry, Obama’s give-away of carbon credits to
polluters, Obama’s lame and mostly-for-show ‘assistance’ to home owners/credit
card holders/workers, Obama’s federal subsidies and guarantees so too-big-to-
fail banks can purchased ‘failed’ smaller banks, Obama’s tepid approach to
regulation of the financial industry, can be added Obama’s mis-guided efforts to
‘win’ in Afghanistan. That Obama does not have enough sense to listen to the
people who elected him is startling.  America is worse for it. While I fear the
Republican alternatives are worse, I believe Obama’s time is limited unless he can
come to his senses and support the American people who once supported him.

Report this

By jreed, August 31, 2009 at 6:38 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I’m not so sure about what to think of this…torture is not my think, but sometimes it’s required to get the answers from the Enemy.

Report this

By History Repeats Itself, August 31, 2009 at 5:38 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Until we include Pakistan as a combat zone in order to search and destroy our
enemies, we are doomed to repeat the lessons not learned from the Vietnam war
where Laos and Cambodia were “off-limits” to U.S. forces.

Report this

By T. Scherer, Candidate US Congress KS-03, August 31, 2009 at 5:22 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The media has done a great of ignoring this war in Afghanistan so long, does anyone remember why there is this alleged war?

I support bringing our troops home ASAP instead of sending 6000 more troops. The voters and nonvoters here in Kansas want our troops home. 

Finally, we should ensure never again do we use National Guard troops to fight an international war. I am pretty certain the purpose of the National Guard was to protect the United States from attacks domestically—not internationally. 


Report this

By katrinna, August 31, 2009 at 1:59 pm Link to this comment

Afghanistan:  Obama’s Viet Nam   -  unless he seriously starts working on an(stop leaving it to other people)exit strategy and clamps down on that multi-colored robed high priest of the poppy fields, Karzai.  Stop being a law professor, Obama-BE the change you want(ed) to be when you ran for prez.

Report this

By Mary Ann McNeely, August 31, 2009 at 1:07 pm Link to this comment

Obama’s vaunted intelligence means nothing here.  For men like him and General Darkchrystal, this is now simply a question of balls and the length of their dicks.  Obama could’ve withdrawn as soon as he assumed power.  Like the skinny Napoleons that he and Darkchrystal are, they’re going to screw the pooch until the Afghans kick us out or we effectively run out our line of credit with the banks of foreign nations.

Report this

By ardee, August 31, 2009 at 12:54 pm Link to this comment

We would have had better achievements, better results, if the Afghans were consulted right from the beginning,” he told the BBC’s Newshour programme.

Gee, a gung ho special forces guy critical of a war effort…..and the quote above, from an Afghani official really shows the arrogance of our methods….

Report this
LostHills's avatar

By LostHills, August 31, 2009 at 12:53 pm Link to this comment

Bring the troops home now, give McCrystol an early retirement, and indict Gates and Petrayus.

Report this
Right Top, Site wide - Care2
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide

Like Truthdig on Facebook