![]() |
![]() |
||
|
Britain Under Fire From U.S. for Breaking Lockerbie Bomber PledgePosted on Aug 28, 2009
Earlier this month, the Scottish government released convicted “Lockerbie bomber” Abdul Baset Ali al-Megrahi, afflicted with terminal prostate cancer, to live out the rest of his days in his native Libya—a move that reportedly went against a decade-old agreement with the U.S. that those found guilty of causing the 1988 airline tragedy would stay put in Scotland to serve their time. —KA
Advertisement Previous item: Britain Under Fire From U.S. for Breaking Lockerbie Bomber Pledge Next item: Britain Under Fire From U.S. for Breaking Lockerbie Bomber Pledge Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By jreed, August 31 at 3:37 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Well, what do they want from us…sympathy? He caused so many people to die…well, we’ll give him our “sorries” but not for what he did.
Report thisBy Lisa, August 30 at 9:52 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I just pray he doesn’t harm any more people.
Report thisBy Tech, August 30 at 5:01 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
That’s corruption at it’s worst.
Report thisBy Moremony services, August 30 at 12:44 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
hello, This article is just more of the same.I have seen but a few articles lately that even mention that there is some doubt about his guilt,let alone revealing the real truth.
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, August 29 at 9:51 pm #
What an outrage that this perfectly innocent man was
Report thisallowed to go free! So it was for an oil deal, so what?
The guy was framed to begin with.
By Gezelda, August 29 at 9:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
And even if he was guilty, what earthly good would it do anybody to keep him locked up while he died of cancer, lonely and far from home to boot? Would that make anybody happy? We need do get a grasp of one important humanizing question: “What if it were me?” Answering it honestly would prevent a lot of mistakes.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, August 29 at 7:04 pm #
I bet he didn’t do it. He has no motive. He is free, with the world media around him and he yet he denies he had anything to do with it.
Qui bono?
http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/news/display.var.2528070.0.The_truth_never_dies.php
Report thisBy mike112769, August 29 at 5:19 pm #
One thing that has drastically changed since the 90s: the standing of America in the rest of the world’s eyes. We have lost some serious goodwill over the last 20 years. After WWII, we could’ve gotten away with murder. The problem is, we tried to. We are no longer respected/feared as once we were.
Report thisBy ardee, August 29 at 12:46 pm #
The dumbist of the Kennedy brothers,
Hmmm, the dumbest of a smart bunch cant be all that bad…..C’mon FT, misspelling when accusing another of being dumb? Now that’s funny, I don’t care what anyone says…...
Report thisBy Folktruther, August 29 at 11:40 am #
US foreign policy is based on violence, bribery and deceit, which is sanitized in the American media. Bribery in trials, elections, and leaders of client states- per Paul Roberts, a former asst treasurer under Reagan-has been standard under the War on Communism in the 20th century and has increased under the War on Terrorism in the 21st.
Once a patsy is chosen in a case like Lockerbie, as illusstrated by the torture of random people imprisoned in Gitmo, every effort by the media and pols is made to keep them there, and denigrate them to legitimate past injustice by power.
In this case, Ted Kennedy joined a number of other Dem senators to prevent this prisoner from dying at home, to maintain the prestige of US imperialism. A disgusting act by a disgusting pol.
The dumbist of the Kennedy brothers, his major cowardness had nothing to do with his famous car accident, which only indicated that he coundn’t drive straight.
He legitimated by his silence the murders of his brothers covered up by the most egregous fraudulence ever perpetrated historically in public relations frauds. He was instrumental in destroying US unions in his support of deregulation in 1970’s and Nafta in the 90’s.
I post this here because TD does not permit me to comment on Scheer’s disgusting eulogy of Kennedy.
Report thisBy The Mad Loon, August 29 at 11:10 am #
Just one more big lie foisted on the public by traditional media lapdogs and their corporate masters.
Lockerbie was Irans response to the US’s shooting down of an Iranian passenger jet. However to admit this would have embarrassed the US gov, so Libya and an innocent man were framed denying the victims
families true justice.
This article is just more of the same.I have seen but a few articles lately that even mention that there is some doubt about his guilt,let alone revealing the real truth.
Report thisBy ardee, August 29 at 7:48 am #
brewerstroupe, August 29 at 3:31 am
Thank you for giving those of us unaware of the possible innocence of this man the hidden facts of this case. I hope that some at least will realize exactly how manipulated are the opinions of the American public.
Report thisBy diamond, August 29 at 4:38 am #
You’re absolutely right Brewerstroupe. Another example of fraud and corruption and the use of a patsy. A man who used to work for the CIA admitted that the witnesses in this case were bribed to give evidence against the accused. al Megrahi is the Libyan version of Bruce Ivins who was also stitched up by the FBI - in his case for sending the anthrax letters in 2001 that were actually the work of the CIA. The really interesting question is why did they need a patsy?This almost always indicates Secret Service involvement in the crime.
Report thisBy jack, August 29 at 3:43 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
... explain what changed.
OK, the patsy wouldn’t roll over and to avoid genuine evidence getting into
court, a deal was cut.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14908
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/lockerbie-evidence-planted-
by-cia-1586487.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/cia-memos-reveal-
doubts-over-key-lockerbie-witness-913918.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1344536/Lockerbie-timer-mans-
CIA-letter.html
http://washington.bizjournals.com/washington/prnewswire/press_releases/Di
strict_of_Columbia/2009/08/27/SF66970
it goes on and on, but the truth will never appear in a court of law, as only hysterical hyperbole spins through the MSM in the wake of “the deal” - same ol’ same ol’
Report thisBy brewerstroupe, August 29 at 3:31 am #
The release of al-Megrahi came as a result of a deal whereby he dropped his appeal. That appeal would most likely have succeeded. Scotland was simply doing its part in covering up a huge mess made by Britain and the U.S. The ultra-reliable Gwynne Dyer told the story:
GWYNNE DYER has worked as a freelance journalist, columnist, broadcaster and lecturer on international affairs for more than 20 years, but he was originally trained as an historian. Born in Newfoundland, he received degrees from Canadian, American and British universities, finishing with a Ph.D. in Military and Middle Eastern History from the University of London. He served in three navies and held academic appointments at the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst and Oxford University before launching his twice-weekly column on international affairs, which is published by over 175 papers in some 45 countries.
The entire Lockerbie trial was chapter and verse of major powers subverting the judicial process to further a geopolitical agenda. Libya was the “demon du jour” of the times and it worked. A similar case can be found in the AMIA bombing in Argentina. This time it was Iran in the frame.
Report thisGareth Porter has dealt to that one:
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080204/porter
By Paul, August 29 at 1:21 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
That’s easy - the US made an agreement with the UK, but it’s no longer up to the UK to decide the issue, it’s up to Scotland. It’s not unlike when someone makes an agreement with the US govt., but then finds out that as far as the current administration (whoever that is) is concerned the agreement was with the *previous* administration, not with the govt.
Report thisBy P. T., August 29 at 12:43 am #
The British ruling class pursues its own interests (for example, Libyan oil). The U.S. ruling class does the same thing (for example, oil wars). That’s capitalism.
Report this