LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 21, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Intelligentsia Against Intelligence

Lipstick on a Rogue

The Afghanistan Speech Obama Should Give (but Won't)

Throw the Money Changers Out of the Temple

Battlefield in the War of Ideas

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Enough G-2 Talk Already
Despite Subsidies, Class Sizes Rise in California Schools

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
 * NEW! * Freedom’s Fight: Part II

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Myron book cover

Myron

by Gore Vidal
Very Fine, Collector's Copy $150 NOW $70

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Surveillance Case Gets Canned

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Aug 21, 2009
Surveillance
infowars.net

The Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, was initially brought under fire after the Bush administration ignored its limits on government snooping.

A judge has rejected a challenge to FISA brought by activists abroad who fear that their communications may be tapped by the U.S. government. The judge said fear is not enough to warrant a change in the law, and that challenges need to make explicit claims of unlawful surveillance. The question remains: How does one know he is being surveilled?

The BBC:

A US judge has rejected a challenge to a law that allows intelligence services to eavesdrop on overseas conversations to gather intelligence.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act allows the US to monitor the calls and emails of non-US citizens abroad.

Human rights groups contended that their workers might be bugged for talking to people under surveillance.

But District Judge John Koeltl in New York said the mere fear of surveillance was not enough to bring a lawsuit.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By ChaoticGood, August 21 at 4:50 pm #

So the “threat” preemption that is the core of the “Bush Doctrine” does not apply to citizens of the USA.  When confronted by an imagined threat, the USA can invade and destroy any country they wish, but citizens who imagine threat are powerless to intercede until they have been hurt. Hmmmm…

Ok, lets say you have been spyed upon and you don’t know about it, well you cannot do anything.  Ok lets take it to the next step, you know you have been spied upon and so does everyone else, now you have to prove harm, I suppose.  How do you do that?

Next step, you are spied upon, you simultaneously appear on the no-fly list and you cannot get a bank loan.  How do you prove linkage between the spying and the damage.  Ans: you can’t

So the bottom line is just open the door for “Big Brother” to come in and stay a while, or forever.

The “Land of the Free and the home of the Brave” indeed.

If you really care about this, then you can encrypt your email very easily and stop 100% of that type of spying. I wonder if real terrorists know about email encryption.  OOPS I hear the sound of jackboots on my sidewalk, must hide now, try to post later….

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.