LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 25, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Age Trumps Youth in UC Tuition Dispute

Obama Risks Losing His Judicial Prize

Books, Not Bombs

Delay Worked for Kennedy

Refuse Allegiance to Coal

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Delay Worked for Kennedy
 * NEW! * Books, Not Bombs

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Freedom’s Fight: Part II

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
The Yankee Years

The Yankee Years

By Joe Torre and Tom Verducci
$17.79

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Afghanistan Surge Limited by ‘Dwell Time’

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Aug 16, 2009
USAF / Senior Airman Sheila deVera

Giving troops more time with their families between deployments could limit the military’s ability to expand the war in Afghanistan.

Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top commander in Afghanistan, may ask for more troops, but whether he’ll get any is in doubt. Defense Secretary Robert Gates has already moved to expand the Army, but getting troops the downtime they need between deployments will limit how many can be sent to the escalating war in South Asia.  —PS

Christian Science Monitor:

Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said that Gen. Stanley McChrystal is free to ask for whatever he thinks is needed for the mission. But should the general ask for tens of thousands of more forces, as some analysts involved in his Afghanistan assessment have suggested, those troops may not be available right away.

Mr. Gates indicated as much Thursday when he said that providing more forces to Afghanistan in the near term would be a challenge because the drawdown in Iraq won’t begin substantively until early next year.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Spike, August 17 at 7:35 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

You got it exactly right Mike.  All of Afghanistan and everything in is theirs; and, not one scrap of it is worth one American life.

Report this

By mike112769, August 17 at 5:05 pm #

We don’t NEED to be in Afghanistan. Whatever happened to the United States who believed in the right of the people to have self-determination? We are in Afghanistan to stop the taliban from taking over, right? Well, the taliban couldn’t take over if the people didn’t want them to. If they want the taliban, let them have it. Bring our troops home. If we are then attacked again, retaliate ruthlessly. We don’t need to invade a country, and then fail to have the political will necessary to finish the job. The truth is, we could have already killed all of our enemies there, but we were afraid of being seen as “merciless, savage, killers’” Isn’t that what war is about? If you are foolish enough to fight in an offensive war, you MUST have the balls to do what is needed to finish it. An example: when the rebels in Fallujah first started attacking us, I would have lined up every Abrams tank we had, and driven straight through the town of Fallujah until not a brick was left standing. Until we show people we can be as hard as them, we will ALWAYS be a soft target. Now, because we are so afraid of hurting “innocents”, we are bogged down and going nowhere. We are so afraid of world opinion, we were letting our troops get shot and killed from cemetaries, because we weren’t allowed to blow up mosques! That is ridiculous. ALL of the soldiers, on both sides, are innocents. Our troops signed up to protect our country, and they were told we have to kill the taliban to do this. Most of them probably realize that’s bullshit, but what are they to do? Their troops are mainly illiterate farmers, one or two generations removed from being nomads. The only book most of them will ever see or read is the koran. Well, muhhamed says it’s okay to kill the infidel. When the one you think is god tells you to do it, (through the imams), what are they to do? Both armies are being fed a bunch of bullshit from their leaders. The citizens in both countries have a great share of the blame, for allowing these things to continue.

Report this

By godistwaddle, August 17 at 2:40 pm #

Transferring troops to Afghanistan gives the Afghans a better chance to show that they,  like the Iraqis, can demonstrate their patriotism by killing their brutal invaders, occupiers, and disrupters (with bombs) of their wedding parties.

Report this

By coloradokarl, August 17 at 11:08 am #

At first I could not figure out why Obama wanted to “finish the job” in Afhanistan. Was it “look I am tough too” campaign rhetoric? or maybe he is paying off campaign bribes to the Military Industrial Complex?. Maybe, Just maybe, it is pay back to all the kids in Kansas who always picked him to be the Indian and now he wants to show everyone he can be a Cowboy, A TOUGH COWBOY!!!

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.