LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 23, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Intelligentsia Against Intelligence

The Guantanamo Lawyers: Shipwrecked

Battlefield in the War of Ideas

Claire Wasserman on Europe's Islamic Immigrants

'Left, Right & Center': The Geithner-Summers Backlash; Is Palin Dangerous?

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Despite Subsidies, Class Sizes Rise in California Schools

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Freedom’s Fight: Part II

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
A Mercy

A Mercy

By Toni Morrison
$14.37

America and the Islamic Bomb: The Deadly Compromise

America and the Islamic Bomb: The Deadly Compromise

By David Armstrong and Joseph J. Trento
$16.47

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Gay Rights Group Puts Marriage Fight on Hold

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Aug 12, 2009
Flickr / ProComKelly

Equality California, possibly the biggest gay rights group in California, will wait until the 2012 election to attempt to overturn the state’s gay marriage ban. The organization’s director says “we think we have one shot” and that it will take time to marshal the necessary forces. Other groups have their sights set on 2010.

Equality California has been campaigning to overturn Proposition 8 since the measure passed last year, and the group has come to the conclusion that it needs more time. But waiting until 2010 to act with full force also means competing with a presidential election for attention and funding.

Update: For interested readers, Equality California explains its reasoning in greater detail here.

San Francisco Chronicle:

But [Equality California President Geoff Kors] cautioned that in the fight for same-sex marriage, “we think we have one shot” at what will be a considerable political challenge. Same-sex marriage supporters need to “make the most strategic decision we can…it will all take time. ‘’

“It’s not going to happen overnight ... another loss would drain incredible resources,” Kors said. “To think that two years later we can come back and win ... I don’t think we can risk that. I don’t think we have the resources to do it.”

Still, he acknowledged that a 2010 ballot measure could qualify as late as November and its supporters may have until April to collect enough signatures to get it on the ballot. If that happens, “we’d of course support that ... and try to see victory. Our goal is equality.”

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Chrome Bag - Free Shipping

Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By anonymous, August 22 at 11:29 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I grew up without a father and it hurt me deeply.
The consideration should be the best interest of the children (0ur society fall or stands on this).
Children need a mother and a father not two mommies and two daddies or uncle Joe. They will tell you that
kids or normal and adjusted but the harmful effects of not having both comes out as late as middle age.
Many people are in abusive relationships or have low self-esteem issues from the missing parent. Great if people say they don’t plan to have kids but the majority of married people will!

Report this

By RavenBurnes, August 14 at 9:35 pm #

No minority group, regardless of its nature, should have its basic rights be dependent upon a “majority vote”.  I am African American and I do not want anyone voting on whether or not I should get full rights as a citizen. That should be a gimme.  I think homosexuals should be excused from paying taxes or any other mandatory government fees until they are treated like any other American citizen.

Report this

By hippie4ever, August 13 at 12:59 pm #

Russian, I agree that human rights do not belong in the ballot box, but unfortunately many years of republican misrule has created a pool of vicious reichwing judges who will not enforce the Constitution. The California Supreme Court has the ethical center of a crack house.

The movement continues: I guess the people on the payroll of Ethical California want a few more years of pay in order to survive the Depression. I guess I can’t blame them but we aren’t going to take “a few years off” in our fight for civil rights in this diseased and corrupt “republic.”

Report this

By Mozzer75, August 13 at 1:25 am #

The pressure here should be on the President, not on local legislatures. President Obama can suspend the ramifications of “Don’t ask, don’t tell” with a simple Executive Order. Doing so would not REPEAL the policy, but simply render it inanimate by discouraging prosecution. OUR PRESIDENT has not done so. Therefore, the current gay agenda renders itself impotent - in the primetime of a (liberal?) democratic Presidency, we cannot even manage the smallest things. Why? Because the economy sucks? Because political capital has to be spent on health care?  What happened to fearlessness? What happened to promises?

Report this

By Russian Paul, August 13 at 12:49 am #

I don’t see why they would wait. The longer we wait, the more this crap gets legitimized. The sad thing is, we shouldn’t even be voting on this, this is the responsibility of the courts.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.