LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 16, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

The Imperial Way: American Decline in Perspective, Part 2

Apple's China Comes Home to Haunt Us

'Losing' the World: American Decline in Perspective, Part 1

What's Really at Stake in 2012

Whither 'Colbert Report'?

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

California Sees Red

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Jul 15, 2009
Flickr / Franco Folini

A homeless woman picks through a trash can. Lawmakers are closing in on a deal that would make drastic cuts to education, welfare and other social programs, rather than raising taxes.

Looks like Republicans are going to win out in California’s seemingly endless budget battle, despite holding a minority in the state Legislature. The deal lawmakers are inching toward favors Gov. Schwarzenegger’s desire to make the poor, the elderly and schoolchildren pay for the state’s financial crisis.

San Jose Mercury News:
SACRAMENTO — Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and legislative leaders say they’re nearing a deal to close the state’s $26.3 billion deficit. And despite California’s left-leaning electorate, the final product is almost certain to be settled on Republican terms, with deep spending cuts to most state programs and no new taxes.
Read more

The state’s budget rules require the approval of a two-thirds majority, allowing the Republican minority to dictate terms.

It doesn’t help that the Golden State is desperate. California, which already has the worst credit rating in the nation, has issued millions in IOUs.

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By KDelphi, July 20, 2009 at 9:47 am Link to this comment

seeitnow—Empathizing with the rich? They dont need my empathy. Thats the easy way out.

Disabled, elderly, children, anyone that is at a disadvantage will be further disadvantaged. Its a measure of a society and ours doesnt meaure up.

I thought maybe California did.

Report this

By samosamo, July 19, 2009 at 8:39 pm Link to this comment

By seeitnow, July 18 at 4:44 pm
“”...seem to be implying that it is the fault of the rich that there is a budget problem in California.”“
****************************************************

The problem IS the rich but it is the government that is the money problem for providing needs for the ‘less fortunate’ and unfortunately for california, their stupid legislature requires a 3/4 majority vote for passage of at least the funding/spending bills which conveniently allows a just small enough miniority of a party to stop the measure which is just another part of the people’s government doing their job of protecting those with the money as if they were ‘a’ or ‘the’ national treasure(s) that deserve absolute protection of their incomes and money.

Break this up and the playing field becomes a bit more level and equatible or at least it sounds that simple.

Report this

By seeitnow, July 19, 2009 at 4:54 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

KDelphi:

You seem to have narrowed it down to disabled people while I was refering to a different group. The truly disabled do need and diserve our help. But there are degrees of help - perhaps California will continue to provide an acceptable level of support - acceptable to most. It isn’t necessarily your approval that is necessary. Try to empathize with those that think differently. Perhaps this is the time to get a little tougher with those that continually depend on and ask for support from others.

Report this

By KDelphi, July 19, 2009 at 4:35 pm Link to this comment

seeitnow—Yes. I find your views to be morally objectionable.

You are certainly not alone in still believing in the “US, mertitocracy”—but you are quickly becoming a minority.

I think that a rich society has a moral obligation to legislate egalitarianism and to take care of fellow citizens when they cannot take care of themwelves. If you do not, you have a moral deficit, in my opinion.

Cutting off disabled people while others make millions is not objectionable to those without a conscience. Is that you?

Report this

By samosamo, July 19, 2009 at 8:42 am Link to this comment

****************************************************

This is a national thing and the republican’s desire, very strong desire, to regain the control they once enjoyed, though here again, there ain’t much difference in a democrat and a republican, but in california as I have read it, news is that even though the repubs are severely ‘out numbered’ in the state legislature, THEY are preventing any meaningful funding legislation from passing for the those ‘poor and disabled’ and from what I see and read the ‘faux’ rivalry of both parties indicate a national similarity.

If I am reading the information wrong someone tell me, I don’t like being ignorant any more than anyone else and I don’t want poor or disabled people to not get services they need just because an ‘elite’ class of jackass politicians subvert the system at ANY and all levels of government which I have tried, admittedly only at election times, to remind voters that even as prioritized and important the presidential race is, it is also a time to elect in most or some areas the local governments and the state governments which are as small as they seem in comparison to the national government, they are extremely important and not just popularity contests for corporations.

Report this

By seeitnow, July 18, 2009 at 12:44 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

KDelphi:

You seem to be implying that it is the fault of the rich that there is a budget problem in California. Is it also a problem of the rich that so many of the poor seem to have so many out-of-wedlock children they cannot afford. How about the propensity of the poor to engage in addictions like smoking or drinking or acquiring tatoos or dining at fast food restaurants or maintaining several pets that they can’t afford. Is that also the rich to blame ?  At what point is the left going to begin holding these citizens responsible for their poor life choices ?

I don’t feel at all guilty for this criticism, I grew up poor. Nothing was wasted. Survival was paramount. Dependence on others for anything was to be avoided at all costs. Responsibility for one’s own actions was instilled. Is there something about this view that you find objectionalble ?

Report this

By KDelphi, July 18, 2009 at 9:59 am Link to this comment

seeitnow—to pretend that Ca’s unwillingness to pay for social services, in a state with so many rich people,is an issue of “affordabillity” is absurd. It is a matter of moral will.It is an issue of priorities.

What would you have the kids and poor and disabled do? or maybe you just dont care.

I know the pain of trying to work with people with severe problems, for a low salary, only to find out your budget will be cut. I enjoyed doing it, but, if I wasnt doing it, people like you might have to deal with the problem yourself.

But, I suppose you dont even want to pay for school for kids…I will never understand people like you.

Report this

By samosamo, July 16, 2009 at 6:50 pm Link to this comment

By Karen, July 16 at 5:41 pm

The republicans are out to make the whole economy so bad or seem so bad that they think the will be returned to power in 2010 and 2012 but with a little careful thought about the other parties(anything besides democrat or republican) could just squeak some new blood in washington and I am not just talking about the president but also your senators, if they are up for election this time, and also your representative in the house, same goes for your state officals running for office and it has a good shot of breaking up the lobbying scandal in washington that should have been investigated and prosecuted long time ago because it is criminal bribery.

Report this

By idarad, July 16, 2009 at 4:22 pm Link to this comment

Karen -
Well stated!  Thanks

Report this

By seeitnow, July 16, 2009 at 3:18 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Something like an oxymoron, “the poor, the elderly and schoolchildren” pay for the state’s financial crises. These classes of people are net beneficiaries of the taxes the rest of us pay. Hard to see how they are made to “pay” for the crises. That we must temper the amount of generosity shown to these groups is a problem of affordability not one of punitive measures.

Report this

By samosamo, July 16, 2009 at 3:16 pm Link to this comment

As goes california, so goes the nation.

Report this

By Karen, July 16, 2009 at 1:41 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

California’s bond rating is now one step above junk.  This means the state will have to pay a high interest rate for the money it borrows (and with a $20+ billion deficit it is going to have to borrow).  So, more money will go to those who can afford to buy bonds and less will be available to fund things like schools, roads, hospitals (lets hope swine flu goes away because public health departments are on furlough!), fire fighting… etc!

Thank you, ReThugs!  Thank you, Awnuld!  They don’t offer any solutions; all they can think to do is slash the budget.  Talk about not being able to think “outside the box” or even inside the box, for that matter.  They are ideologues who are only interested in getting power, but once there, they have no idea what to do (remember Bush and Hurricane Katrina!).  They don’t like government (because it won’t let them rape and pillage) and they don’t know how to govern.

I believe it was John Dean in his book, Conservatives Without a Conscience, who said (paraphrasing):  People without a conscience (sociopaths) should not be allowed near the reins of power:  They can’t empathize and, thus cannot feel the pain they cause, and they do not care who they hurt.  All they care about is power.

Report this

By Mary Ann McNeely, July 16, 2009 at 12:42 pm Link to this comment

I have a couple of suggestions to revive California:

1.  Legalize boo.

2.  Advertise California as the Death Capitol of the United States.  Are you terminally ill?  Come to California and die in the sun.  Start to build hospices, hundreds of them, that are a cross between Club Med and Disneyland.  Sounds vulgar?  Of course it is.  But it will work.

Report this

By jonr, July 16, 2009 at 11:37 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

What’s strange about the situation is that, along with Delaware, Montana and Vermont, California actually has one of the most progressive state tax systems in the country… so why the problem?

50% of Californians made less than $39,000 in 2002, while 20% made more than $80,000.  Real estate prices being what they are, I’m not thinking even $80,000 in California is exactly a fortune.  Only 5% made more than $168,000, so I’m not thinking there are nearly as many rich people there as the rest of us might think. 
In fact, the income levels aren’t enough different from Oregon or Oklahoma (30% at most) to justify the stupid-incredible real estate prices.  Which is where all the money in California seems to have gone.

The spiral has to stop someplace.  Maybe the subprime mortgate crisis has found its real home.

Report this

By Reubenesque, July 16, 2009 at 10:30 am Link to this comment

If you dig down to the bottom of that trash barrel, homeless lady,  you’ll probably find Arnold’s and a few other Republican souls.

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, July 16, 2009 at 8:44 am Link to this comment

Hey, whats with my picture on the top of the page and first I am no lady, second I am not homeless and I was placing my fish and chips garbage in the can, yeah that’s it, in the can!

Report this
Virginia777's avatar

By Virginia777, July 16, 2009 at 8:18 am Link to this comment

California does has a left-leaning electorate, but the Left has been far too weak in stopping the bullish advance of the extreme Right in the State.

Now we have fascist Arnold at the helm, what a mess!

The Left needs only to mobilize in California, we could solve this mess!!

Report this

By idarad, July 16, 2009 at 3:50 am Link to this comment

rockinrobin -
My point exactly, but it is not the politicians that own the corporations, it is the other way around. Clinton didn’t have much of anything until he left Arkansas.  If you think the politicians own the corps, explain Exxon.  Exploitation is not the problem, it is the expression of capitalism in its purest form.  You can put lipstick on a pig it is still a republican/democrat/capitalist/fascist.
Humanity as a whole will never benefit from this economic model, the longer it goes on the less our chances of surviving our own undoing.

Report this

By George, July 16, 2009 at 2:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It’s time for another revolution. Velvet preferred.

Report this

By KDelphi, July 15, 2009 at 9:22 pm Link to this comment

And “BANKS” have decided to stop cashing the IOUs!

California’s “plan” seems to be the entire US “plan”!

The “health care plan” will cut Medicaid and Medicare , and all states are cutting help for the poorest of the poor.

If the US population hasnt had enough yet, it must be brain damaged, by mercury in the water.

Idarad—-yes….youre right, sadly or not…I am so sick of seeing the elites try to prop it up, maybe it will take the “middle class” suffering as the working classes do, for anything to change…

Report this

By rockinrobin, July 15, 2009 at 8:51 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Capitalism is NOT the problem: the PROBLEM is EXPLOITATION: which is TARGETING and HARMING for PERSONAL PROFIT & GAIN: the Politicians OWN the CORPS folks: Monsanto/Clinton/Bush/Rockefeller/ PHARMA: ALL like octopuses have their hands in everything; so incredibly easy to MANIPULATE markets & MANIPULATE media isn’t it? And the PEOPLE are so STUPID that they will buy ANYTHING that is said!
So EASY to say “prices” rising; when it PADS your POCKETBOOKS isn’t it? THIS is NOT capitalism at all; nor is it DEMOCRACY folks: it is HARMING the PEOPLE, the LAND, the AIR, and the WATER: for THEIR personal profit & THEIR personal gain. Their agenda is simple: they are ripping up community gardens, forcing farmers & orchard owners out of business: you will be able to buy from THEM also: with SEEDS CREATED to CAUSE SICKNESS/DISEASE; so you can PAY THEM AGAIN to get well; so easy when the COST is $5.00 to make it 10.00 then 20.00 then $100.00, then $1000.00 then MORE: cuz the PEOPLE do NOTHING EVER.
http://www.publicintegrity.org; there is NOT ONE GOV AGENCY that is doing the work it is taking MEGA BUCKS to do; there is NO JUSTICE in the land at all;
THIS is why they like Hillary can blow $100,000,000.00 (one hundred million) in just one single month: living large & being in charge: during her Pres run; which lasted 20 months; do whatever you want however you want whenever you want & never be brought to justice; Oh, and “have all the money you want for you & your friends”; all the while DENYING military personnel medical supplies: and treatment; claiming “not enuf paperwork”; blah blah blah; isn’t it TIME for a CHANGE YET????

Report this

By xypher, July 15, 2009 at 8:27 pm Link to this comment

GOP always cuts education. It’s easier to get people to vote against their own self interests if they don’t understand what they are voting for.

Report this

By idarad, July 15, 2009 at 8:22 pm Link to this comment

This may be what it takes for reality to shine in the face of the deniers.  As long as there is the continued attempt to have private armies funded by corporations, governments that are owned and beholden to the corporations, there is but one word that describes that society and it is fascism.

The California system that allows a majority of uninformed voters to legislate at the ballet by direct democracy (actually by those who still vote to enfranchise a corrupt system) will lead to its demise.  California is the posterchild if you will of what happens when social “values” become ballot issues.  You can’t decide human rights at the ballot box.  You can’t run a state’s budget at the ballot box. California is a disaster of its own making and a result of pure greed.

The good news at this point in time, is the true nature of capitalism and greed is reaching its apex, and its demise is soon to follow.  The bad news is all the viable alternative systems attempted in the past, some better some worse, were destroyed before they could provide valuable lessons to humanity.  We will now need the courage to reformulate our relationship as a member of a fragile world, a delicately balanced ecosystem that can either provide for the well being of its inhabitants, or that will simply say, in its own way “enough is enough” and shake off the cancer that afflicts it.

Undoubtedly the greedy will continue to try to patch a broken system, but all they offer is more of the same. The patches are patching patches.  The new beginnings are approaching.  Hang on for the ride, it will be a hell of a journey!

Report this

By Commune115, July 15, 2009 at 5:39 pm Link to this comment

If there was ever a state where the American workers need to rise up and take power, it’s California.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.