![]() |
![]() |
||
|
Progressives Flex Health Care MusclePosted on Jul 8, 2009The progressive Democrats in Congress have had just about enough of all this bipartisanship, especially if it means scrapping a public health care plan. Rahm Emanuel recanted his hint of compromise to a room full of hopping-mad House liberals Tuesday night.
Earlier, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid made it clear losing a public option was a deal-breaker for 10 to 15 Senate Democrats.
Advertisement Previous item: Google Gives Microsoft a New Reason to Lose Sleep Next item: Pope Says Capitalism Is Failing CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
We just got faster!
Our site is growing, and we’ve upgraded our servers to bring you a better, faster Truthdig experience.
We’re thrilled with our improvement — but it’s added a lot to our costs. Please help us to keep things snappy and make sure you have instant access to thousands of in-depth Truthdig articles, interviews, videos and cartoons.
Please chip in today with a gift to keep us moving forward. Then check out the site for yourself!
By ardee, July 9, 2009 at 7:41 am #
rollzone, July 9 at 12:46 am #
do i need to move to another planet?
Nope, just to Canada, or France, or any number of nations in which health care is free cradle to grave..My personal choice is Switzerland.
Report thisBy Scott Greene, July 9, 2009 at 2:33 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The product of health insurance is to provide you with medical coverage when you need it.
Unlike other businesses that need to provide you with their product in order to make any money, health insurance companies actually make more money for themselves when they restrict and do not pay claims.
In other words, they make more money when they do NOT provide the product that you have paid them for.
Read the 50 to 70 pages of your health insurance contract.
Pay particular attention to the section entitled “limitations and exclusions”.
People’s health is not a product that needs to be left to the whims of money motivated CEO’s and stockholders.
If that is your thinking, you might as well have your police and fire department protection based on insurance premiums you pay.
Then you can go to the police and fire protection insurance page for ‘limitations and exclusions’ on whether or not the police or fire department would come out to your house in the event of an emergency.
The point is, you would never think of discriminating against another citizen if he was the victim of a fire or crime.
Report thisSo why would you be ok with health insurance companies discriminating against fellow citizens who have pre-existing medical conditions?
By rollzone, July 9, 2009 at 12:46 am #
hello. i want to know insurance is not run by the new mafia. i want healthcare prices that are affordable without insurance. i want lower taxes and less government. do i need to move to another planet?
Report thisBy evano, July 8, 2009 at 9:04 pm #
Oh my goodness! Lost jobs! How horrible. We must immediately scrap the single-payer legislation, especially if it’s going to cost jobs in the vital field of prescription drug salesmen.
How will we ever cope without drug-pushers going from doctor’s office to doctor’s office, handing out free drug samples like candy. They provide a vital service to society, making sure the medical community is informed and ready to prescribe new miracle drugs to treat such horrible diseases as Restless Leg Syndrome. Or new formulations of opioid painkillers which are responsible for most of the 27,531 deaths in 2006 from prescription drugs. Or pitching drugs for smoking cessation which have the unfortunate side effects of causing hallucinations, seizures, heart problems, and suicide.
Beyond what the pundits leave out, there’s also what your accounting leaves out: the many more than 100,000 jobs that will be created by a public option for health insurance. Consumers and employers will be saving bundles of money on health-care costs driven downward (finally!) by competition. Businesses will be able to hire more employees, and consumers will be able to spend and invest the extra cash in their bank accounts.
And the public option will also help people like me, unemployed since December. My wife and I are 47 years old and both have several “pre-existing conditions” which would have made private insurance too expensive—even while excluding payment of any claims for those conditions. Until the advent of the 6-month COBRA premium reduction contained in the stimulus package, I had to use most of my limited savings in order to pay my $1200 monthly health insurance premium while receiving $1520 per month in unemployment insurance.
So, please forgive me if I’m not shedding tears for the people in your industry. Maybe they should try for jobs lobbying Congress on behalf of the health-care industry. I hear it’s a booming industry right now.
Report thisBy RobertinWestbury, July 8, 2009 at 8:42 pm #
Medsearch…
Oh well…
I hate to sound insensitive to anyone about to lose a job (if in fact you are about to).. But the ridiculous amount of money we waste in this country by having a greedy middleman who is allowed to make all the decisions is pitiful.
If it means 100,000 people have to be retrained in a more honorable profession… so be it.
We have an economic crisis that is largely a result of the greed of that industry.
I do not believe private insurance will disappear anyway. There will always be those wealthy individuals and corporations that will buy into it.
For myself, I’ll take the public option any day.
Report thisBy medsearch, July 8, 2009 at 6:39 pm #
What none of the pundits pitching the single payer system are willing to discuss, is the fact that it will cost the nation over 100,000 jobs!
At my company, http://www.gorillamedicalsales.com , a job board for medical device sales representatives and pharmaceutical sales representatives to seek employment in their industry, we are already seeing vacant sales positions left unfilled as medical companies prepare for Obama’s health care reform.
Report thisBy Hulk2008, July 8, 2009 at 3:46 pm #
It’s “Rainmaker” time - like the movie.
Report thisI once served 4 years in the USAF - that means I had “single payer” during that time - it was fine: no “rationing” (GOP Lie #1), no waiting in line (no more than any other GI line like for chow, no out of pocket expenses, no deductibles, no COB, no family deductibles, no co-pays ..... unless you count paying for a phone or TV or meals in the hospital room. This is the coverage Congress gets. Moreover, people like John McCain and his family have had this coverage ltierally for generations - they know nothing about “private insurance”.
I now have worked 41 years in software development - nearly 2/3 of that time for hospitals, drug companies, and health insurance companies. I have seen what private insures do to avoid paying even the simplest claims. I have seen drug companies charge a fraction of their costs in other countries while forcing US citizens to pony up huge profits. I have seen CEOs turn companies from mutual to profit-only - companies that used to return 96 cents of each premium dollar which now return only 60 cents per…. and are being sued by doctors and hospitals for non-payment of claims. I have seen arrogant doctors who blithely reject million-dollar projects and studies to cut costs “just because”.
It’s time ordinary citizens reject the GOP lies along with the drug companies and private insurer lies.
....... just in case, I am learning Swedish and French - I am old and may have to emigrate to get health care.
By Pat Kelly, July 8, 2009 at 1:49 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
when talking about single payer it must be repeated consantly that it is a form of insurance delivery not healthcare.It just replaces corporate insurance with the peoples insurance.Everybody pays into a pool of money that is used to pay providers,nobody is excluded,all are covered.No profits,low overhead costs,managed by civil servants,accountable to the public.
Report thisBy Bud, July 8, 2009 at 10:19 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I want the same healthcare benefit package that every member of congress has.If they can’t come up with an equitable plan that addresses the needs of EVERY SINGLE AMERICAN,then perhaps a movement should be set in motion to deny these parasites their healthcare package.
Report thisBy NYCartist, July 8, 2009 at 10:03 am #
We want single payer.
Report thisBy ardee, July 8, 2009 at 7:57 am #
Revenue neutral? Washington speak for impossible.
Accounting tricks to defray real and necessary health care for all of us. If you want to consider the cost of a single payer system, and you are honest ( eliminating all our politicos ) you must factor in the horrific cost of our current for-profit system that delivers only the 36th best health care in the industrialised world…...
I would imagine that , using those figures, including the bankruptcies, loss of homes and jobs as well, single payer is a bargain.
Report this