LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.   Exclusive Truthdig Merchandise - Gore Vidal signed first editions - Signed Mr. Fish prints
November 13, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Getting Out of Afghanistan With Grace

'Daily Show': Cold Busted, Sean Hannity

The Socialist Threat Comes to 'South Park'

Happy 40th Sesame Street

Where Does the Caving End?

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Where Does the Caving End?

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Freedom’s Fight

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
GraceLand

GraceLand

By Chris Abani
$11.20

The Media Monopoly

The Media Monopoly

By Ben Bagdikian
$12.92

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

‘Compensation Czar’ to Oversee Exec Pay

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Jun 11, 2009
ENTER_ALT_TEXT
commons.wikimedia.org

Feinberg’s job will be to determine if executive pay is “sound and appropriate” at seven bailed-out firms.

The Obama administration on Wednesday enthroned Washington lawyer Kenneth Feinberg as its “compensation czar,” whose job it will be to oversee the salaries and bonuses of 175 top executives of our beloved bailed-out financial firms, including AIG, Citibank, Bank of America and GM. The White House’s initial call to cap executive pay at $500,000 is no longer on the menu.

Bloomberg:

Kenneth R. Feinberg, who mediated disputes over compensation for damages from the Sept. 11 attacks and Agent Orange, must now separate bankers from their paychecks.

Feinberg, named yesterday as the Obama administration’s “special master” on executive pay, will have authority to regulate compensation for 175 executives at seven companies that received “exceptional” government help. He steps into the political maelstrom that erupted after disclosures that firms such as Merrill Lynch & Co., blamed for fueling the financial crisis, still paid workers multimillion dollar bonuses.

Read More

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By ocjim, June 12 at 11:20 am #

I see American top executives as criminals in the category of armed robbers: armed with power they take money they haven’t earned.

In 2004 the ratio of the average CEO pay to the average worker pay in the US was 475 to 1. In Japan it was 11 to 1 and in Canada, 20 to 1. We must look at more autocratic countries to even find it close: Venezuela is 50 to 1.

This specter has been with us for decades, but only after many of these same leaders in the US brought us near economic Armageddon, their companies into or near bankruptcy, and their hands out to the taxpayers, do we even start to question their obscene pay.

Inexplicably, the obscenity of their pay still continues, and we can surmise that it will not stop until their company is literally in the toilet and perhaps we are all on the dole.

Let’s look at some examples of what their leadership has brought us, never mind the undeserved millions it has brought them.

Japanese executives of Toyota, earning pennies compared to American executives, brought their company to the position of number one seller of cars in the world, replacing GM whose executives pulled in hundreds of millions of dollars per year, this while dragging GM to bankruptcy.

Meanwhile American titans of finance, after a rapacious greed-fest of dragging us through the muck of relentless risk-taking, are still paying themselves millions for their failures, this while collecting a taxpayer bail-out of billions.

If American business leaders are more than 20 times better than foreign chief executive officers, would you not expect much superior leadership and intelligence, including leading their companies into the realm of advanced technology and innovative techniques of management?

Why did many excel by giving technology to developing countries like China as they outsourced many manufacturing tasks and technical methodologies?  Was it because Chinese leaders were more wily, more driven, and more intelligent? And was it because American executives could personally receive even more short-term pay and kudos in the process?

Why did Boeing executives outsource most of the major aircraft assemblies for the Boeing 787 to Japan, Germany, Britain and South Korea? Was this superior management for the long-term, wanting to keep their technological edge and skilled workers near?

And why do other countries enjoy superior and cheaper internet access, better and more cost-effective health care services and seemingly better educated citizens? Does the American economic pie only cover excess executive pay and corporate bailouts?

I think we will find that more unbridled greed, narcissism, and a short-term myopia is all that we bought in skills from our overpaid executives.

Certainly while they continue to rake in personal fortunes, the current evidence has brought this home to us: recession, bankrupt state treasuries, lost jobs, debt, unfunded human investment, and worn-out infrastructure.

Report this

By RAE, June 11 at 7:40 pm #

Because public money was used (in the hundreds of millions) to bail out these firms, AND ONLY BECAUSE OF THAT, do I agree the government has any right or role in what executives get paid.

If the stockholders and others to whom these “top managers” answer agree that more of the profits go to them then who is the government to say otherwise?

That said, I find it difficult to justify in my own mind the astronomical salaries and bonuses paid. “In order to get top management talent we MUST pay these big salaries,” is the cry from the Board.

I say BS. Or at least BS until any given manager has been in the job long enough to legitimately claim personal credit for any improvement in the company’s financial picture. This does NOT include windfall profits from being lucky or in the right place at the right time.

If a CEO comes up with an original scheme and puts it into action which results in a significant increase in profits, THEN and only then should a bonus even be considered… and even then, it’s unlikely the CEO did it all by himself, so it’s share the wealth equitably amongst ALL who contributed to the success.

“Golden Handshakes” should be made illegal. I don’t care what it says in a “contract”... you leave and you get maybe a month’s salary. If you get fired then presumably it’s for some “cause.” It should be “bye-bye” - don’t let the door kick you in the ass on the way out. This nonsense about taking hundreds of thousands with you is pure BS-theft. That money belongs to the company and stockholders.

Report this

By Spike, June 11 at 7:16 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Don’t pay any of these mutts a dime until they get the mess they made straightened out.  They certainly don’t need the money—given the level of their expertise in handling funds, their little piggy banks at home should be jammed full of ‘rainy day bux’.

Report this

By johannes, June 11 at 3:03 pm #

Are we speeking here over the USA, or Israel, is the top intelligentia in the USA only made up by Jewes citizen, I think to much gives the wrong picture.


Salutations

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.


 
Click here to learn more about Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.