![]() |
![]() |
||
|
Supremes Stall Chrysler DealPosted on Jun 8, 2009
The Supreme Court has put the brakes on President Obama’s plans to bail out the auto industry, ordering a stay of the sale of Chrysler to Fiat. Before the ruling, the administration said blocking the deal would have “grave consequences” for Chrysler. Also, it could threaten the government’s plans for the much larger and more complicated GM. Update: The Court has lifted the stay.
Advertisement Previous item: China to Censor Online Porn, Possibly Basketball Next item: Some Banks to Repay Bailout Funds Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By samosamo, June 9 at 4:24 pm #
By Blackspeare, June 9 at 3:34 pm
““they can’t be influence by SCOTUS or can they??!!”“
**************************************************
I didn’t think 5 members of the supreme court could traitorously take the 2000 election away from the voters of america but they did and got away with it.
Report thisAnd what other evidence does one need to see what the new ‘corporate’ supreme court is capable of, after all the people appointed are more on the corporate pay than on the people’s pay because corporations pay mo’ betta money.
By Blackspeare, June 9 at 3:34 pm #
More interesting is that Magna International,a Canadian car parts manufacturing company has acquired the rights to buy Opel from GM. Since Opel is a German car company, they can’t be influence by SCOTUS or can they??!!
Report thisBy C Ronk, June 9 at 2:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
None of this would be happening if our car companies made a decent car that could compete in a world economy. I hope this sale goes through. Maybe, just maybe they can make some affordable cars that are made well and look good for a change.
Report thisBy skulz fontaine, June 8 at 9:55 pm #
Ummm geez Truthdig, it wasn’t the “Supremes” it was Ruth Bader Ginsburg. One Supreme. Let us not be misleading here.
Report this