johannes wrote: “...so I think its not wise to mix people up, of differend sexuel directions, thats all.”

It seems to me that English is not your first language so I congratulate you for participating on an English language site. English must be very difficult to learn as a second or third language. I guess that’s because it’s such a flexible, fluid language… always changing… always borrowing words and phrases from other languages… always inventing new terms and words. And we who use it all the time often don’t follow the rules because it adds much color and variety and expression - interest - in our communications.

It is most important that we “mix up the sexual orientations.” Why? Because the ONLY way we will, as you say “... lets be human and write and speak with each other to get closer in our way of living to gether and in our ways of thinking.” is to BE together and TALK together and WORK & PLAY together (even if we don’t sleep together!)

The more people are separated, or separate themselves, from others, the easier it is to discriminate against them. One of the reasons discrimination against gays and lesbians continues in the 21st Century is because most references to homosexuals are ERASED from the literature taught in schools. When truth is not taught it’s easy to continue the lies.

Dear Mister RAE

I must say I don’t know what an glib is.

My comments come all ways from the hart, I don’t want to hurt some one, thats so easy on an anonymes site.

Behaving is the same for every body, but I KNOW how
people behave, and they like to hurt other people, so I think its not wise to mix people up, of differend
sexuel directions, thats all.

I find people every where all the time more aggressive in their doings, lets be human and write
and speak with each other to get closer in our way of living to gether and in our ways of thinking.

Salutations

johannes… may I respectfully suggest you read a little HISTORY before airing your glib opinions…

http://www.epinions.com/review/Gay_Warriors_A_Documentary_History_from_the_Ancient_World_to_the_Present/content_80521825924

But I do agree with you when you state: “...big problems some people don’t know how to behave.” At least I agree if you mean BOTH “some” homosexuals AND heterosexuals. Ignorance doesn’t recognize boundaries according to race, religion or sexual orientation. So boot PEOPLE who don’t know how to behave… not just boot those whose philosophies of life and/or sexual orientation you don’t agree with.

There’s something really wrong with the STRAIGHTS if they go berzerk if there’s a “gay” in their midst. Such behavior says a lot more about the STRAIGHTS than it does about the gays.

AWM, June 8 at 3:29 pm #

If this court was asked to rule on slavery they probably would rule in favor of it.I always thought that the US constitution prohibited discrimination.But I guess activist
******************************

At least by a 5-4 decision.

Did you see yesterday that in a 5-4 decision the Court said a judge in a MAJOR case should have recused himself since he was judging a major contributor to his campaign—and ruled in their favor?

Somehow, only Kennedy of the Fascist Five had a problem with that and broke with the Fascist Four.  Scalia, Roberts, Thomas and Alito ALL dissented.  I guess they believe corruption in judges is OK.

You could also be honest with your self, without trying to hurt other human creatures.

An army is made up, of fighting units, very close living body’s, for my feeling its not the place for differend sexuel directions, the same for woman, you are asking for problems, we have seen it in our U boot crews, big problems some people don’t know how to behave.

Salutations

To gay men & women:

Join up (pick a time when there’s a lull between wars)...

Get a fine education in a marketable field, to degree level if possible,

Then “tell” and get your discharge.

Sure beats living for four years on KD in a hovel to wind up with a $30,000 tuition bill to start you off.

If the government wants to be so backwardly ignorant about sexual orientation then they deserve to get “played.” Too bad it’s the American taxpayer’s money instead of the politicans’ personal funds but, so be it.

If this court was asked to rule on slavery they probably would rule in favor of it.I always thought that the US constitution prohibited discrimination.But I guess activist

Those gays not absolutely wedded to the military should now say (since they owe this country nothing), “Hey, colonel, I’m gay.  Send me home.”