|
|||
|
Obama’s Next Target: Hedge FundsPosted on Apr 30, 2009
President Obama gave certain hedge fund manager types who held out for “an unjustified taxpayer bailout,” as he put it, a dressing down in the midst of his comments about Chrysler’s bankruptcy filing on Thursday. Needless to say, that didn’t go over so well with the targeted demographic.
Advertisement CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By ardee, May 4, 2009 at 2:45 am Link to this comment
OMG
I cannot help but ponder, as Obama turns his attention to Hedge Funds, how many trillions will he mow give to them?
( only slightly ironic)
Report thisBy youraveragejoe, May 3, 2009 at 3:22 pm Link to this comment
I can’t believe I agree with BO on something.
“Hedge” has nothing to do with what hedge funds do. They’re part of the problem that vaunted Senate oversight has failed to deal with for over 2 years.
Report thisBy Ibett, May 2, 2009 at 3:27 pm Link to this comment
Henry Bregstein, who is co-managing partner at law firm Katten Muchin Rosenman and who represents hedge funds, said it is possible that accepting the government’s offer could have theoretically exposed the funds that Obama criticized to lawsuits from investors.
So, what is to keep taxpayers from looking deep into these funds and go ahead with a lawsuit?
IBETT
Report thisBy thebeerdoctor, May 2, 2009 at 6:44 am Link to this comment
“I don’t stand with those who held out when everybody else is making sacrifices.”... thus spake President Obama, while addressing concerns about hedge funds. But this remarkable sentence could have just as easily been applied to other matters concerning his administration. In the case of the most recent catastrophe in the Middle East, the Israeli assault on Gaza, most certainly Israel has held out while the Palestinians made nearly all the sacrifice.
Report thisIn the case of Treasury Secretary Geithner, he certainly held out, when the International Monetary Fund issued a check to pay his federal taxes, which he did not pay for another 3 years.
In the case of economics guru Larry Summers, he too held out as a hedge fund advisor, while holding down his day job as president of Harvard.
In the case of President Obama himself, he held out from using the word “holocaust” when referring to the 1915 genocide of Armenians, committed by Turkey, for fear of offending the strategic NATO partner.
By G.Anderson, May 1, 2009 at 9:09 pm Link to this comment
The same people who created this mess are still in charge, all we did is change the name of the President nothing else.
After all the posturing, and B.S., the hedge fund owners will get everything they want, and we’ll have to pay for it.
Because that’s the bottom line of what’s happening, and that’s why Obama was elected, he’s supposed to sell it to us.
They’re crazy to think that we’ll have a country left after their through with it, but maybe that’s what they want.
Report thisBy Lori, May 1, 2009 at 8:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Sure lol right he is facist owned by the banks
http://www.theendrun.com/2009/clinton-quigley-and-the-new-world-order/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20090428_the_clinton_bubble/
http://www.businessinsider.com/were-too-corrupt-to-fix-the-financial-system-2009-4
http://www.businessinsider.com/henry-blodget-is-obama-in-wall-streets-pocket-2009-4
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/04/30-8
Report thisTop Senate Democrat: Bankers ‘Own’ the US Congress
by Glenn Greenwald
By triopicgirl, April 30, 2009 at 6:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Too little too late. When Obama talks about finances everyone gets numb (screwed before so bad). It won’t matter. It’s pretty much over. When Obama talks about finances, no one listens. (wasn’t that a commercial?).
Report this