Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 18, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

The Terror Con

The FBI May Have Finally Found Jimmy Hoffa

Say Hello to the 'Super Rich'

The Making of a Global Security State

This Will Not End Well

Most Comments
Most Emailed

 * NEW! * The Making of a Global Security State
 * NEW! * Climate Change Puts Lake Life at Risk
 * NEW! * The Terror Con



The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Obama’s Next Target: Hedge Funds

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Apr 30, 2009
Obama
AP photo / Gerald Herbert

President Barack Obama, with members of his Cabinet and the auto industry task force, discusses Chrysler’s bankruptcy filing on Thursday.

President Obama gave certain hedge fund manager types who held out for “an unjustified taxpayer bailout,” as he put it, a dressing down in the midst of his comments about Chrysler’s bankruptcy filing on Thursday. Needless to say, that didn’t go over so well with the targeted demographic.

The Wall Street Journal:

The comments, which came after an unnamed administration official went so far as to say the holdouts weren’t acting in the national interest, overshadowed some of the details of the historic Chapter 11 filing and news of Chrysler’s alliance with Fiat SpA (FIATY). The fact that Obama expressed his displeasure more than once during his remarks seemed to indicate he was picking a fight with hedge funds, and it didn’t play well with many on Wall Street.

“So what?” said Phil Goldstein, who runs Bulldog Investors, referring to the decision by some funds to hold out. “Aren’t you entitled to reject a deal?” said Goldstein, who has railed against hedge-fund regulation in the past.

Henry Bregstein, who is co-managing partner at law firm Katten Muchin Rosenman and who represents hedge funds, said it is possible that accepting the government’s offer could have theoretically exposed the funds that Obama criticized to lawsuits from investors.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By ardee, May 4, 2009 at 3:45 am Link to this comment

OMG

I cannot help but ponder, as Obama turns his attention to Hedge Funds, how many trillions will he mow give to them?

( only slightly ironic)

Report this

By youraveragejoe, May 3, 2009 at 4:22 pm Link to this comment

I can’t believe I agree with BO on something. 

“Hedge” has nothing to do with what hedge funds do.  They’re part of the problem that vaunted Senate oversight has failed to deal with for over 2 years.

Report this

By Ibett, May 2, 2009 at 4:27 pm Link to this comment

Henry Bregstein, who is co-managing partner at law firm Katten Muchin Rosenman and who represents hedge funds, said it is possible that accepting the government’s offer could have theoretically exposed the funds that Obama criticized to lawsuits from investors.

So, what is to keep taxpayers from looking deep into these funds and go ahead with a lawsuit?

IBETT

Report this
thebeerdoctor's avatar

By thebeerdoctor, May 2, 2009 at 7:44 am Link to this comment

“I don’t stand with those who held out when everybody else is making sacrifices.”... thus spake President Obama, while addressing concerns about hedge funds. But this remarkable sentence could have just as easily been applied to other matters concerning his administration. In the case of the most recent catastrophe in the Middle East, the Israeli assault on Gaza, most certainly Israel has held out while the Palestinians made nearly all the sacrifice.
In the case of Treasury Secretary Geithner, he certainly held out, when the International Monetary Fund issued a check to pay his federal taxes, which he did not pay for another 3 years.
In the case of economics guru Larry Summers, he too held out as a hedge fund advisor, while holding down his day job as president of Harvard.
In the case of President Obama himself, he held out from using the word “holocaust” when referring to the 1915 genocide of Armenians, committed by Turkey, for fear of offending the strategic NATO partner.

Report this
G.Anderson's avatar

By G.Anderson, May 1, 2009 at 10:09 pm Link to this comment

The same people who created this mess are still in charge, all we did is change the name of the President nothing else.

After all the posturing, and B.S., the hedge fund owners will get everything they want, and we’ll have to pay for it.

Because that’s the bottom line of what’s happening, and that’s why Obama was elected, he’s supposed to sell it to us.

They’re crazy to think that we’ll have a country left after their through with it, but maybe that’s what they want.

Report this

By triopicgirl, April 30, 2009 at 7:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Too little too late. When Obama talks about finances everyone gets numb (screwed before so bad). It won’t matter. It’s pretty much over. When Obama talks about finances, no one listens. (wasn’t that a commercial?).

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.