LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 11, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Morris Berman and the Decline of America

'Crazy Horse': A Study in Erotic Abstraction

More From Chris Hedges on Black Bloc

Silent State: Washington's Campaign Against Whistle-Blowers

The Right's Boon in Knox v. SEIU

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Embracing ‘Enough’

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Political Divide

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
A Prayer for America

A Prayer for America

By Dennis Kucinich
$11.95

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Krugman on Bybee and the ‘Apparatchiks’

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Share
Posted on Apr 27, 2009
Krugman
Wikimedia Commons / Prolineserver

Clearly, Paul Krugman, pictured at right, is no fan of federal Judge Jay Bybee, legislative enabler of the “enhanced interrogation technique” that’s become one shameful symbol of the past eight years: waterboarding. You know it’s not good when Newt Gingrich is held up as a paragon of a bygone, and preferable, brand of Republicanism.

Paul Krugman in The New York Times:

And here’s the thing: most prominent Republicans are just the same. We wonder how someone as hapless as John Boehner could be minority leader, why one Congressman after another abjectly apologizes to Rush Limbaugh, and so on; the answer is that they’re hollow men, careerists who thought they had a safe ride. If someone like Newt Gingrich seems like a giant in his party these days, that’s because, say what you like about him (and I don’t like much about him!), he got into the business when doing so involved taking some actual risks.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

Purple Girl's avatar

By Purple Girl, May 6, 2009 at 7:55 am Link to this comment

Beware the Wolves in Sheeps clothing. I have serious concerns about the agenda of the legion of Clintonites and their Blue ‘Conservadem’ lap dogs, including Krugman.
The Clinton Legacy is not only marred by a sex scandal, it is neck deep in economic betrayal- NAFTA,Modernization Act…
In fact the Clinton era not only failed to defend the Carter years, but help solidify the misnomer about his ‘weakness’ and ‘ineptitude’. The Recession was in full swing before Carter, and the Iran situation was brewing as soon as the Shaw was handed Power. Not to mention the fact that some back room deals were going on which undermined his authority- aka Iran Contra, something that was never fully investigated to expose who really was pulling the stirngs before that election.Something Clinton could have revisited.
As for the Greed Doctrine openly practiced and flaunted on Wall Street- no concept of ethics or foresight into the ramifications- Who was teaching these students of Economics and Business which laid not only the Ground work, but Developed the shortsighted operating mission statements.Who failed to teach ethics and deductive reasoning, making both obsolete concepts when their theories were applied in the real world?
Having a neice with a PhD in Economics- This culture of greed and apathy is a learned behavior, a form of indoctrinations, and it’s started in our insitutions of Higher Learning. Mr. Krugman would you be willing to share with US your cirriculum for the last 3 decades? Do you expect US to believe you were swimming against the pervasive current of Supply side and Trickle Down economics?when it has been shown to be the mainstay theory which guided Reagan, HW and Clinton?Two admins of which you had affiliations with?
Seems to me ‘youngsters’ like Geithner were students after this ideology had already taken root in our Universities.Essentially the finger pointing at the Wall Streeters and Bankers is a way to deflect blame away from the mentors and on the backs of the proteges.
Until Krugman can prove he was not part of the problem which was created over 2 decades ago- I will continue to take his opinions with a grain of salt- ‘Thou Protest too much’

Report this
Hulk2008's avatar

By Hulk2008, April 28, 2009 at 6:56 am Link to this comment

I listened in amazement to the testimony Mr. Gingrich provided in opposition to the cap-and-trade energy bill.  Basically he denied all science that suggests the earth is in any kind of ecological danger, even to the point of stating that half of Antarctica is actually getting colder these days.  I imagine that there were many political giants in the days of Noah proclaiming that a serious drought was on its way.  But realistically, I suspect Newt was merely providing his typical obstructionist attitudes rather than presenting anything scientifically concrete.  In his mind, it’s more important to block all progressive action than considering any remotely useful commentary.

Report this
G.Anderson's avatar

By G.Anderson, April 27, 2009 at 12:16 pm Link to this comment

I wonder during this time of trials of our nation, why so few of our so called leaders are echoing what Mr. Krugman is saying?

They seem always to look for the easy way out, to placate and sooth, and therapize our reactions.

Has our nation grown so tepid in it’s love for freedom that this is the depth of it’s response?

If this is the case then, our troubles with the right have only just begun.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.