And Now, This Tepid Message From Our Treasury Chief
Posted on Mar 19, 2009
 |
| AP photo / Gerald Herbert |
That’s him in the corner: Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner looks on as President Obama talks about the economy on Monday.
|
We’ve seen a lot of Timothy Geithner lately in the news—usually looking concerned yet purposeful as he stands behind the president in photos and press conferences—but we haven’t heard a great deal straight from the source. On Thursday, CNN’s Ali Velshi managed to get the treasury secretary talking, but what Geithner had to say is distinctly underwhelming.
During the interview, Geithner casts the current economic crisis as a kind of financial natural disaster, calling “financial crises ... brutal and indiscriminate in the pain they cause,” thus bringing to mind something more like a tornado than a phenomenon that is directly shaped by humans, especially those in positions of power.
However, earlier in the discussion he acknowledges that man-made circumstances are partly to blame, making reference to the “enormously challenging inherited problems” that he and the rest of the current administration are facing. Also, Geithner kicks off the whole tête-à-tête by proudly noting, “I spent my entire professional life working in institutions that are responsible for American economic policy.” It doesn’t require advanced knowledge of economic axioms to detect that something doesn’t quite add up here.
CNN:
Velshi: The president has referred to you as uniquely qualified for the job of treasury secretary. What does he mean by that?
Geithner: You know, I’ve had this great privilege in life, which is I spent my entire professional life working in institutions that are responsible for American economic policy. I started in the Treasury in 1988, spent 12 years of my life there.
This is an enormously talented group of people, both here and at the Federal Reserve, where I also worked for some time. And I’ve had the great privilege of working with great, great men and women in some of the most challenging financial crises of the last 20 years.
[...] You know, financial crises are brutal and indiscriminate in the pain they cause. And they have this basic tragic unfairness: that people who are careful and responsible in their personal and professional judgments are being damaged by the actions of those who were less careful and less prudent.
And it is an important obligation of government to make sure that we’re moving very, very quickly to try to address those challenges.
Velshi: Now you must know that ... there are a lot of people who don’t think that’s the case. They think that somehow, those who have been responsible for things have been rewarded. How can you do a better job of communicating that you’re focused on individuals who haven’t done the wrong thing?
Geithner: I think the American people are just enormously frustrated and angry that they find themselves in this position. But I want them to understand that everything we’re doing is designed to make sure that we’re getting the credit necessary to help them do what they need to do.
Read more
More Below the Ad
Comments
Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
By Daniel, March 24, 2009 at 6:44 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Tim Geithner does get it - his knowledge of the AIG “retention” (no these people left) payments to those people who were contractual obligated to receive severence packages under the old bill, is an attempt to be bipartisan. If he were to strong arm liberal leftist policies by imposing them on the rigth and far-right, there would be no difference whatsoever from the policies under George W. Bush.
Report thisSo for the people who simply do not understand what is happening, your voices are better left unheard.
By Feral Cat, March 21, 2009 at 9:06 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
They’re all weasels with no moral compass. They do not have fully developed consciences. It’s all smoke and mirrors and Orwellian management speak that comes out of their mouths. Matt Taibbi has a must read investigation of the crooks who ended up “punching a hole in the fabric of the universe”.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/26793903/the_big_takeover/print
The financial sector paid over 5 billion in campaign contributions and lobbyists in the last 10 years. (Internet contributions were really chump change in every sense of the word chump.) They got what they wanted in deregulating these banksters under Democratic and Republican presidents. Taibbi says that our nation now resembles an Enron type black box company where scheming insiders pay themselves millions while they screw the “involuntary shareholders” aka taxpayers.
Nobody in that White House is looking out for us involuntary shareholders. I don’t care how concerned or outraged they look.
Weasel words.
Report thisBy Purple Girl, March 21, 2009 at 7:56 am Link to this comment
The ‘Fredo’ Obama must Kiss Goodbye.
Report thisThese economic Gurus aren’t just shitting in the litter box- their burying shit in our kids sand boxes.
Geitner (and Summers) have Betrayed this Admin and the American people. They had no desire to rectify their long running fuck ups and crimes- only to conceal and proliferate them under the guise of Redemption.
Buried those AIG (et al) Bonus’ to Explode once Obama Took office ah? What other landmines have Geitner, Summers & Berenke concealed?
Step Down? No they should be rounded up and prosecuted with the rest of the Organized Crime sysdicate which Betrayed our Country (Treason) and caused World wide death and mayhem (Crimes against Humanity). ‘Want to play Ball, Scarecrow?’ We’ve got a Game for You All, It’s Called hide needle on the lethal injection!!
By wildflower, March 20, 2009 at 8:12 pm Link to this comment
Re Eltiante
Wholeheartedly agree it was a waste of time for Obama to try to appease Republicans. I suspect Obama’s bipartisan efforts were due to the economic crisis. He mistakenly thought the Republicans would put aside the rhetoric for a moment and come to the aid of their country. Silly, huh?
As for the “oversight” measures, it has become clear to me there was only a handful of people in Washington who wanted “oversight measures” on these bonuses. If a majority had insisted on oversight measures, we would have had them, and they wouldn’t have disappeared later in conference. Washington’s current show of “outrage” is obviously for our eyes and ears only.
As for THE man, you’re forgetting he also received a considerable amount of campaign contributions and support from regular folks – a lot more than he received from Wall Street employees. To date, most of his regular folk supporters are pleased with his overall performance. This may or may not change.
Report thisBy diamond, March 20, 2009 at 1:06 pm Link to this comment
If you take a long term approach to the economic crisis, yes, in the short term it’s a bracing dose of reality and will require redesigning the global banking system and many other economic facts of life and it will require us all to live by our wits for a while. But on the plus side, it got the neo cons out of government and halted their plans to take over the world. I think that’s as much to be celebrated as Hitler losing world war II. It also proves that what happens in cyberspace eventually has to be dealt with in the real world. I don’t think the neo cons had faced this unpleasant fact during the entire term of the Bush presidency. And whatever Obama or for that matter Geithner do in their respective roles, they won’t be blowing up any American buildings any time soon or starting wars of conquest in the Middle East. In spite of the economic problems it’s a better day now that the neo-fascists have been thrown out of office. It’s not helpful to try to hang the political blame for this mess on the people who are trying to clean it up. This is why progressives never make much political progress in America. Misled by the mainstream media into disloyalty and self-destructive attacks on their own side. If one ounce of this vigilance and outrage had been directed at Dick Cheney and George Bush it might all never have happened in the first place. But the power elite only ever unleash the media on the Democrats.
Report thisBy M. Currey, March 20, 2009 at 8:25 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Maybe the President does not have the right to tell Corporations about pay caps, but when same company is bailed out and the U.S. owned 80% of company seems as the balance of scales has changed.
Bailout and Bonus together do not make sense especially since the Auto Industry made its employees take a pay freeeze, a cost of living freeze and other things.
Seems to me that W.S. things they are intitled to more while the country goes down the rat hole.
The Republicans want their way until the country goes under then they take their money to another country.
THIS IS MY COUNTRY AND I WANT IT TO SURVIVE AND CONGRESS’ WAY OF DOING BUSINESS HAS GOT TO CHANGE.
Report thisBy RdV, March 20, 2009 at 5:00 am Link to this comment
He doesn’t look “concerned yet purposeful” he looks obviously guilty and so does Summers despite the fact that they keep spewing the same platitudes and patroning drivel when they aren’t trying to frame the perception that they are the talented, smart, capable specialists. Everyone knows they were the architects of the disaster—manufacturing, like Bush, their own reality which is now crashing down around us—and the only one who seems to buy into it and prop it up is Obama.
Report thisBy ElTiante, March 19, 2009 at 9:27 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Wildflower: Your comments show why Obama should no longer (and shouldn’t have ever) bent over backwards to appease Republicans. If he allows every move he wants to make to be watered down, the ineffectiveness and absurdity of the measures will come back to bite him.
That said, a man who received so much campaign money from Goldman Sachs and Wall Street in general probably isn’t exactly bending over backwards when he (or his appointee at Treasury) cut the teeth out of oversight measures.
Report thisBy wildflower, March 19, 2009 at 6:32 pm Link to this comment
Re Tolstoy: “Geithner should resign or be fired. He’s not straightforward and clear”
If we’re firing people in Washington who are not straightforward and clear, I would like to add the names of Republican Minority Leader Mitch Mconnell, Senator Jim Demint, and his “right-wing compatriot” Jim Inhofe to the list.
This month they’ve been ranting about the AIG bonuses, but last month they were calling Obama a socialist for trying to set limits on executive pay:
“I really don’t want the government to take over these businesses and start telling them everything about what they can do.” Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told ABC News in February, when asked about Obama’s proposed limits on executive compensation.
Senator Jim DeMint, who attacked the original bailout bill as “pure socialism,” characterized executive pay caps as a dangerous government intervention. “I think it’s a sad day in America when the government starts setting pay, no matter how outlandish they [sic] are,” DeMint told the Huffington Post. “This is just a symptom of what happens when the government intervenes and we start controlling all aspects of the economy.”
DeMint’s right-wing compatriot, James Inhofe, also equated limits on compensation with the demise of the American way. “As I was listening to [Obama] make those statements I thought, is this still America? Do we really tell people how to run [a business], and who to pay, and how much to pay?”
[See Susy Khimm in New Republic’s “The Plank” for more]
Report thishttp://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2009/03/18/they-were-against-it-before-they-were-for-it.aspx
By tolstoy, March 19, 2009 at 4:52 pm Link to this comment
Yes, Geithner should resign or be fired. He’s not straightforward and clear. Who influenced Dodd to include a bonus scheme? Never answered. Why? He says because possibly it was illegal not to. Later his language indicates the question was whether including the bonus provision itself was illegal. This man is sneaky and confusing. Somebody strong should have this job, somebody like Paul Krugman.
Report thisBy Micah, March 19, 2009 at 3:35 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Nope, it seems he does not really get it. He needs to resign. We need some people with a fresh approach and a no nonsense attitude that is willing to kick some ass and return order to the financial systems. That is not Mr. Geithner and if it is, we have not seen it yet.
Report thisBy mill, March 19, 2009 at 3:18 pm Link to this comment
Mr Geithner really doesn’t get it apparently - he knew of the AIG retention payments months back, apparently didn’t think they are utterly immoral, which they are. Mr. Geithner needs to resign, apologizing for putting the interests of rich Wall Street insiders ahead of the interests of the American people as a whole.
Report this