I read the other comments first.  “Rollzone”, thanks for the unintentional laugh.  Now, she only has to satisfy the US President in re foreign policy. (I couldn’t resist that.)

On the serious side: I was thinking as I read the article, what does that mean for us, here, in the future?  Then I realized: wait! Didn’t Mayor Bloomberg illegally “arrest” and detail people who were either watching the peaceful protests or arresting the peaceful demonstrators and holding them overlong, illegally during the Republican National Convention in 2004?  Didn’t the Minn. police arrest/charge and now go forward on their local “patriot” legislation to try people for “felonies” who were in jail (pre-emptively) during the Republican National Convention in 2008 for some kind of “unpatriotic” acts they couldn’t have done, since they were in jail at the time?  Yup.  On the latter: recent coverage on http://www.democracynow.org  Ditto for earlier on RNC, because the cases resulting from the illegal NYPD behavior, may still be ongoing in court.

You look kind of ridiculous lecturing other countries on their bad human rights records when your own country has just supplied the weapons with which to destroy Gaza, including U.N. shelters and food warehouses.

Seriously, people are surprised?  You don’t preface a mortgage application with haranguing the banker about how he behaves towards his family.

http://electricworry.wordpress.com/2009/02/21/money-talks/#more-567

Hillary’s the Third Repug in Obama’s cabinet.Funny she could scrap up a $1.25 from those 18 million Dem supporters to pay off her Repug co sponsored attack on Obama during the primaries.Apparently the majority of her supporters quit when she should have earlier in the year.Or she never really had 18 million to start with- Doesn’t the votes come under suspecion when you can’t get the money to back up the claim?Money Talks, BS claims to votes Walks.
As such, is it any surprise she had no intentions of talking about those pesky ‘human rights’ issues when Trade is your focus.Won’t want to piss off the Lenders would we? Wouldn’t want China to adopt fair labor laws either- that would kill the profit margins of the Multinational corps, using the Chinese as slave labor. god knows the Lead laden protects have been so useful in dumbing down americans we wouldn’t want to cut off the Toxic supply- She’s still Eyeing the Presidency and needs more people to be dimwitted and forgetful, by ‘16 (or will it be ‘12?). If Obama actually gets this ‘green’ energy moving, what will happen to her and Bills financial backers in the ME??? How will they maintian that Library, their lifestyle?
having voted for the SOB twice, spent the ‘90’s constantly defending them- I can’t stand to see or hear from either anymore- Kicked the can down the road and screwed US good, Didn’t ya?
My skin crawls everytime I see her, like it has when ever DICK slithters out of his Shadowy Hole!She’s nothing more than a Repug in a blue pantsuit- always has been, always will be.

@ rollzone, February 21 at 6:48 pm #
> the woman whom could not satisfy her husband when he was the president of the United States,

Is this comment sexist, misogynistic, or just plain stupid? Or all three and more besides.

If a woman’s husband is a philandering fool, it says nothing about the woman. NOTHING. Except that she is apparently kind enough to be married to a known idiot. Like ninety nine percent of the other married women on the planet.

Thank heavens.

“Clinton told a joint news conference that the two would have “frank discussions” on human rights, Tibet, religious freedom and freedom of expression.”

But H. Clinton you of ALL people should know that talk is cheap.  The proof is in the pudding.

the clinton legacy continues: as the woman whom could not satisfy her husband when he was the president of the United States, now gets to bask in the limelight; as the gracious socialist pointlady; only ever seen in her gluttonous glow, until it will be her time, to alight upon her throne, in the White House. Hilary struck a deal for her position, and she doesn’t follow any agenda; but her own. do not look to her to improve any relations around the world with good humanitarians, she is only a friend of money; at any cost.

Who is going to talk about the dissidents in China when we have Guantanamo and the Patriot act.