LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
February 9, 2010
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

The Terror-Industrial Complex

Kidnapping Is Not Charity

Sarah Palin's Cheat Sheet

Palin Calls Global Warming Research 'Snake Oil Science'

Soldier Accused of Waterboarding 4-Year-Old Daughter

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Kidnapping Is Not Charity
A Victim, After All

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Israel Votes in a Bubble

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Feb 10, 2009
Flickr / david55king

With world opinion soured by the recent events in Gaza, Israelis are headed to the polls to elect a new government that is widely expected to move further to the right. Pre-election polls put the conservative Likud in the lead. Labor was a distant fourth, behind even the ultraconservative Yisrael Beitenu, despite taking a hawkish turn.

Israel continues to draw criticism from the U.N. for hampering its relief efforts in Gaza. A number of shipments have been stopped at the border, including—and you can’t make this up—the paper needed to print new textbooks for a course in human rights.

The International Herald Tribune has a succinct primer on Israeli elections here.

AP via International Herald Tribune:

The top U.N. official in Gaza criticized Israel on Monday for blocking the shipment of paper to print textbooks for a new human rights curriculum that will be taught to children in all grades in the Palestinian territory.

Israel also has refused to allow 12 truckloads of notebooks into Gaza as well as plastic sheeting which is turned into plastic bags to distribute food that the U.N. provides to some 900,000 people, John Ging, head of Gaza operations for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency which helps Palestinian refugees, said in a videoconference with reporters at U.N. headquarters.

Read more

New York Times on the election:

Regardless of the erosion of the Likud Party’s lead, recent polls suggest that the right-wing bloc in the new Parliament is likely to be much stronger than the center-left bloc, which would make it easier for Mr. Netanyahu to form a governing coalition.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Peace_Man, February 12, 2009 at 12:42 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Sepharad,

Thank you so much….
After reading this blog everyday for the past few weeks, i was beginning to think I was insane to be the only one on this site acknowledging the immense bias on this site. Your words have reassured me that I don’t post my comments in vain.

To the other posters-
Let me make it clear, that its not that I have an issue per say with the information and articles published, its that I have a problem with the fact that this website cherry-picks the information to support only thier extreme perspective. I think this site would be more truthful if they didn’t continue to ignore and omit the evidence and arguments which challenge theirs. Democratic discourse is essential to having a free flow of ideas which leads to progress and establishing a common ground among people on both sides of the issue.

Thank you.

Report this

By Russian Paul, February 11, 2009 at 4:07 pm #

Peace Man - Despite your best efforts to paint Hamas as the villian, the fact remains that the blockade and settlements is what is threatening the Palestinian people, not Hamas. Palestinians are being starved to death and when they fight back with a few rockets, causing a few tragic casualties, Israel reacts by brutally murdering 1000s of Palestinians, including many women and children.

Hamas is not perfect, but they were elected by the books.

”...for Hamas there can be no peace until Israel is destroyed. That is why they only speak of cease fires with Israel and not peace agreements”

These are lies. Below is the message Hamas has been sending for quite some time now.

“We want to be part of the international community. I think Hamas has no interest now to increase the number of crises in Gaza or to challenge the world. We accept a state in the ‘67 borders. We are not talking about the destruction of Israel.”—Ghazi Hamad, Hamas spokesperson

Report this

By Peace_Man, February 11, 2009 at 12:26 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Thank you Russian Paul and Ed Harges for your very sophisticated and well-informed opinions.

Paul, you say that all (or even most) of the civillian Palestinian population supports Hamas. If this were true then Hamas would have won the elections by more than the 51% which got them elected.
Secondly, lets say that hypothetically all the Palestinian civillians did in fact share Hamas views and agenda, then it would mean that peace between Israel and Palestine would never ever be possible. why you ask? here’s a little “Hammas 101” for you:

Hamas is a ruthless and perhaps to the western mind irrational terrorist organization. In truth, it is not only Islamist, but also Salafist, meaning that it seeks to return to ways of Mohammed and the first Muslims. It has decided to impose Islamic law in Gaza and to impose punishments such as amputation and public stoning.  The small Christian Arab population in Gaza has been persecuted and in some cases killed. Hamas forces have systematically murdered or kneecapped hundreds of members of the rival Fatah organization.
To Hamas, holy war (jihad) is the supreme value and the suffering of the Palestinians is inconsequential, except to the extent that it might to endanger their rule.

All who perish in Jihad are shuhada (holy martyrs) so one should not mourn their death. Indeed sweets are passed out at the mourning tents, just as sweets are passed out at the news of a successful terrorist attack killing Israelis.  Of course, when Israel attempts to strike at the planners and perpetrators of such attacks, then that is Israeli aggression.  For Hamas there can be no peace until Israel is destroyed.
That is why they only speak of cease fires with Israel and not peace agreements.  As Salafists there can never be peace between a Muslim and Jewish state.  Ceasefires are permitted only in order to allow the Muslims time to gather their strength and to eventually defeat their enemy. This is in the tradition of Hudna al Hudaibiyyah when Mohammed signed a 10 year truce with the tribes of Mecca , only one and a half years later once he had gathered sufficient strength he found a pretext for violating the truce and to conquer Mecca . Anyone who fails to recognize the true nature of Hamas is either stupid or blind, or maybe then again, just hopelessly biased.

Report this

By Sepharad, February 10, 2009 at 8:18 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Peace Man—

“Disheartened” is mild compared to some of the feelings TruthDiggers evoked in me until I realized that the site is crawling with seemingly-professional Israel-haters. There are, however, a handful of us who believe that Israel has a right to exist, even if we don’t agree with every single policy of the government, and we do make our arguments based on facts. Usually the hardliners ignore these facts, calling them Zionist propaganda, but it’s important to put them out there anyway, because once in awhile someone is open enough to recognize a truth when they see one—such as the link you posted from BBC which, as you say, is heavily biased but not nearly as biased as this site.

I ventured onto the site about a year ago, in search of more substantive progressive/liberal material than Huffington and Daily Kos offered. I’m an American secular Jew and Zionist, a supporter (like my family here and in Israel) of Peace Now and the Amos Oz school of thought. My hope is that Israel will be able to forge economic ties with an independent Palestinian state and thereby improve the situation in the region, maybe a Middle Eastern Union, economically. I see Hamas and other Islamist movements such as Hezbollah as major threats not only to the survival of Israel but also to any possibility for a decent life for the Palestinians. Trust is fragile, fear is strong, and unreasoning hatred absolutely death to any compromise that will lead to a better life for both peoples.

Although it did take me awhile to reconcile myself with the notion that Judea is no longer OK for Jews to claim as part of their motherland, which it is, I’ve long since adapted to the impossibility of holding on to any part of the West Bank despite the considerable security risk of a small country’s exceedingly narrow waist, subject to being cut in half in times of war. The Arabs are not going to take the Arabs of Palestine in, so Israel has to make it possible for them to live in the West Bank and remove most of the Jewish settlers (though the results of returning land in Gaza are not very reassuring).

If Livni hangs onto her lead and is able to form a government. I’ll be greatly relieved. I’d been afraid that Netanyahu would win because of Hamas’ effect on Israelis, and the results reconfirm my confidence that the Israeli people remain brave and pragmatic, this in spite of the amount of vilification in the international press and on so-called progressive forums. (I’m a former civil rights activist, FoI Act advocate and journalist—now a researchr/writer/historian.)

Please hang in there and keep posting on TruthDig. If nothing else, the progressive movement needs to be reminded what the word actually means.

Report this

By Ed Harges, February 10, 2009 at 6:02 pm #

Self-righteous Israelis whine that press coverage is unfair because it fails to emphasize that some emergency aid to Gaza may have been unfairly distributed.

This is like a slave owner saying,

“Sure, owning slaves and treating them like cattle is morally questionable, but there is blame on both sides. For example, some of my slaves beat their children. So you see, it’s all very complicated….”

Israel is so full of phony moral crap. I’m so sick of it.

Report this

By geronimo, February 10, 2009 at 5:17 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

A Plan For Ending The Israel-Palestine Conflict And Simultaneously Protecting The Homeland

“Namely?”

“Pressured by the public the Obama administration demands that the settler-state agree to an immediate cease-fire and to sitting down with Hamas’ leaders for the purpose of figuring things out.”

“Based on?”

“One equals one.”

“Anything else?’

“Liberty and justice for all.”

“Which will bring peace and justice to the Mideast but how will it keep us safe from terrorists?”

“Israel’s USA-supported massacres of Palestinians and Lebanese is what stokes the hatred and violence that underlies the messianic terrorist movements in the Mideast and elsewhere.”

“Fires out, terrorism stops?”

“Exactly?’

“And then what?”

“Peace on earth and goodwill to all living beings, that’s what.”

Report this

By Folktruther, February 10, 2009 at 4:33 pm #

The leaders of every major party in the Israeli election endorsed the starvation blockade of Gaza, and the slaughter of the Gazan population.  Likud, Lsabor, the Likud off shoot headed by Livni, and Meretz, the Peace Now party.  It is true that the leaders of the Peace Now Meretz party—Amos Ox, Grossman, etc later called for Israeli withdrawal, after the war started when it was too late.

Those leaders include Lieberman, the head of the party of the Russian immigrants, who initiated the banning of the Arab parties from the elections, supports Loyalty Oaths, and the revoking of citizenship of Araabs who are Israeli citizens.

This is the leadership that Obama endorses and whose policies he supports.  Last year the settlements on Palestinian land increased 67%.  Israel wants peace while engaging in ethnic cleansing.  Peace with blood.

Report this

By Russian Paul, February 10, 2009 at 3:49 pm #

Peace Man - You have gotten used to the propoganda spewed out by the mainstream media. It might be politically correct to equally chastise both sides, but it doesn’t reflect reality.

The Palestinians are being slowly starved to death, are you suprised they would steal food and supplies that aren’t being adequately delivered? “They ONLY give the supplies to their supporters?” You mean the entire people of Gaza, their constituency? Or are you still under the false impression that Fatah still has some support?

How about the dropping of white phosphorus on a UN building housing refugees? Or the use of DIME? Compare that to the Jean Valjean crime of stealing food for your people…doesn’t really work. Yes, the rockets are a shame, but they are a response to the blockade, as well as the settlement that keep growing and growing. Also remember, Israel has the 4th largest military in the world.
Pointing the finger at both sides equally and just saying “oh well, this is what happens in war” is exactly what the propoganda is designed to do.

Report this

By Ed Harges, February 10, 2009 at 2:13 pm #

Concerning Israel’s ethnic-nationalist project, there are really two basic things that any American need keep in mind:

(1) Ethically, the project is inherently evil;

(2) Even if the project were not inherently evil, it would still not be right for the United States to undertake, as we have done for many decades, to guarantee — at grave expense to our own interests — the success of this project.

Report this

By Peace_Man, February 10, 2009 at 9:38 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I don’t know who wrote this post but clearly the person has not done their research…

I find it disheartening that on a website called “Truthdig”, I would find such blatantly biased and subjective coverage of events.

Why are you emphasizing only the criticism the UN has toward Israel? Did you know that the UN halted aid to Gaza because Hamas was caught confiscating the aid twice and giving it only to its supporters?

BBC is known to be heavily biased against Israel (though not quite as bad as this site)but even they covered this story:
://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7875171.stm

Israel certainly has much to be criticized for, but this web-site has no journalistic credibility when it only points fingers on the Israeli faults and refuses to investigate both sides of the conflict.

Report this

By Dougcad, February 10, 2009 at 8:21 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Given there are wrongs on both sides of the Israeli/Palestinian debacle, it is Israel who has the main carriage of bringing some sort of resolution to the dispute. Unless Israel makes a strong and meaningful attempt to deal with the real repeat real issues of the conflict (and not just the rockets into southern Israel) there will never be any peace. There is a view that Israel does not really want peace. That with peace the Palestinians would gain very little but the Israelis would lose a lot - particularly large amounts of no strings attached funding from the US plus almost unlimited supply of military hardware. If world reaction to the Gaza invasion is any indication of how Israel is viewed by the rest of the world, then ramping up hostilities and threats of dire consequences to Palestinans as outlined by the Right is a recipe for long term disintegration of Israel. Let us hope that common sense will prevail.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2010 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.