LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 21, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Intelligentsia Against Intelligence

Lipstick on a Rogue

The Afghanistan Speech Obama Should Give (but Won't)

Who Are You and What Have You Done With the Community Organizer We Elected President?

Throw the Money Changers Out of the Temple

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Enough G-2 Talk Already
Despite Subsidies, Class Sizes Rise in California Schools

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
 * NEW! * Freedom’s Fight: Part II

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Another Nominee With Tax Problems

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Feb 5, 2009

What exactly was the point of that endless questionnaire Team Obama famously had prospective worker bees fill out? A fifth Obama nominee has run into some controversy, the fourth due to a failure to pay taxes, although in the case of Labor Secretary-designate Hilda Solis, her husband is to blame.

It seems Mr. Solis recently had to settle $6,400 in tax liens on his business. Those aren’t exactly of Tom Daschle proportions, but it makes one wonder, given how rampant this has been among the select group of Obama nominees, whether anyone actually pays taxes.

No wonder we have such a huge deficit.

Beyond the tax issues, Republicans felt that as labor secretary, Solis would commit the crime of being too friendly to labor groups. How dare she?!

Washington Post:

U.S. President Barack Obama’s pick for Labor secretary faced questions over her husband’s unpaid business taxes on Thursday, the latest in a string of embarrassing tax revelations that have hampered Obama’s efforts to seat a cabinet.

A U.S. Senate panel delayed its vote on Labor Secretary-designate Hilda Solis after the newspaper USA Today reported that her husband paid about $6,400 on Wednesday to settle tax liens that had been outstanding against his business for as long as 16 years.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

Previous item: Justice Ginsburg Has Pancreatic Cancer

Next item: Halt! Who Goes There? Well, Not Aid



Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By lester333, February 7 at 10:00 am #

They would not be for it if they were not going to gain from it.  Simple as that.  Regressive taxes favor the guy with the resources.

Report this

By the tshirt doctor, February 6 at 5:43 pm #

lester333,
you said the Fair tax is for rich people!


explain.

Report this

By 1twenty1, February 6 at 1:44 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Most likely 2/3 of the populace exists with some sort of tax infraction/indebtedness.  A flat tax, properly constructed, would work.  The rich would never let it happen since it would do away with their beloved loopholes.  i.e. all told, Buffet’s secretary pays a much higher percentage of her income in taxes than he does.

Report this

By Leefeller, February 6 at 12:29 pm #

If a small business owes such in taxes, they may have trouble making ends meet, especially with the economy as it tumbles into the resulted quagmire from the people pointing their fingers.  $6400 is small potatoes compared to the ass holes pointing their fingers.  Of course the pointers are Republicans, who represent Big Business, they are very uncomfortable having a labor secretary who represents labor. 

Hell, the CEO caps is scaring the hell out of them.  Integrity is not their strong suit, in fact it is not even an option and forget about accountability.

Any ideas how people can support Solis nomination?

Report this

By lester333, February 6 at 11:37 am #

Come on people. This is a Republican issue trying to convince someone, anyone, that the “Fair” tax is the way to go.  It is for rich people!  That is why they are clamoring for it!  Nothing wrong with the tax system except that the rich people can afford it, and obviously cheat all the time ,so, if we keep it they have to sweat bullets for the rest of their lives all the while complaining.  Obama isn’t going to find one kat that doesn’t have “tax problems” cause they are all part of the problem in this country.  Greed.  His vetting process must be good because it will expose all of them.  What if Bush had tried to vet his whacko appointments: all who were failures, then we would know for sure who are the crooks.  But then again we know they all were just like Obama’s Clinton people.

Report this

By lar, February 6 at 11:08 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

This is in the same league as McCain’s unpaid property taxes.

Report this

By Running Bear Shapiro, February 6 at 8:55 am #

Exactly. The tax laws are so convoluted that anyone with a somewhat complicated return can be “shown” to have “tax problems.”

And just how many of these nominees do their own returns, anyway?

Let the nominees correct whatever the gotcha of the day is, and then get rid of the income tax completely.

Report this

By G.Anderson, February 5 at 10:46 pm #

Who doesn’t have tax problems?

This whole country has tax problems,our tax system is crooked as a dog’s hind leg.

No one likes it, it’s impossible for everyone, even the people that work there.

Instead of focusing on people with tax problems we should be looking at a tax system that causes tax problems for everyone.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.