LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 21, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Intelligentsia Against Intelligence

Lipstick on a Rogue

The Afghanistan Speech Obama Should Give (but Won't)

Who Are You and What Have You Done With the Community Organizer We Elected President?

Throw the Money Changers Out of the Temple

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Enough G-2 Talk Already
Despite Subsidies, Class Sizes Rise in California Schools

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
 * NEW! * Freedom’s Fight: Part II

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Bank of America, Literally

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Jan 16, 2009
Flickr / Betsssssy

The taxpayers’ bank opened a new branch on Thursday: Uncle Sam just threw $20 billion Bank of America’s way. The government is also on the hook for $118 billion more in crap assets. Bank of America chief Ken Lewis calls it the “deal of a lifetime.” No kidding.

McClatchy:

WASHINGTON — With a new round of turmoil gripping the financial markets, the Bush administration late Thursday night rushed $20 billion in emergency funding for Bank of America.

Just months ago, Bank of America, based in Charlotte, N.C., appeared to emerge as the nation’s top bank after it stepped in on Sept. 15 to purchase investment bank Merrill Lynch. After Merrill’s fourth-quarter results proved worse than expected, however, the acquisition was in peril and investors have fled Bank of America in droves.

Bank of America’s stock lost 40 percent of its value during the past 10 days — shares closed on Thursday in single digits for the first time in 18 years — and the taxpayer money will be used to ameliorate the losses from its acquisition of Merrill Lynch. Chief Executive Ken Lewis called it “deal of a lifetime” when it was announced.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Chrome Bag - Free Shipping

Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By hippy pam, January 17 at 12:05 pm #

Let’s see…It was Stand Fed….Then La Salle….Then ??Something??......Now B of A…..

By the way…A C.C.card is considered UNSECURED DEBT…You might want to check out [legally] what that means????

My friend filed bankruptcy and those were forgiven…And this person received new card offers within 6 months….

Report this

By SunflowerPipes.com, January 16 at 7:23 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Over the past couple of months I missed a couple of payments on my Bank of America card. I was out of town for some of the time and just forgot to make a payment. They put my interest rate at 10 times what it had been before. I pointed out that I had sent them 600.00 all of my fees and penalties but informed them that i would not be able to pay the higher interest rate which is now 30%. They refused and closed my credit card hurting my credit but keeping the new 30% interest fee intact. Bank of America has little mercy or patience for their customers and they are burying people like me and at the same time getting massive government welfare. Obviously Bank of America is a dark enterprise whose ambition for money and power has created a significant negative influence on the lives hundreds of thousands of people. I do not know what can be done about them But I do wish that something is done change this company into something much worthy of its name.

SunflowerPipes

Report this

By tops, January 16 at 6:11 pm #

When BofA bought first Country Wide and then Merrill Lynch, both companies were basically insolvent; I always thought that there must have been some quid pro quo with the government. BofA isn"t in the business of doing anyone favors. Why would BofA, in essence bailout two insolvent institutions, by purchasing/ taking them over? They were dead weight with no real value. I always felt that the government probably agreed to compensate BofA with some sort of compensation/ sweetheart deal at a later date to avoid the appearance of a tax payer funded bail out. Remember this was early on, in this crisis, the government officials were still trying to say there was no financial crisis.

When BofA acquired these two companies the government made it seem like BofA was just stepping in and picking up companies with potential future value. The government didn’t want to make appear to be a bailout, which it essentially was, so they just agreed to pay back BofA at a later date. They just dribble out the information over time to obfuscate what they are actually doing.

Looks like this is indeed the case, and BofA is being compensated. What a deal BofA acquires two institutions and the US tax payer picks up the tab.

Report this

By JPinGA, January 16 at 10:59 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

This story just angers me. Yesterday there was a report that stated that BofA and Paulsen made a “more money” arrangement based on these terms. “If we [BofA] don’t get more money, we’ll back out of the Merryl Lynch deal and cripple the economy.”

They got 20 Billion more
They also have 25 Billion in TARP funds
The new agreement also protects them against another 118 Billion in losses.

This is all taxpayer money.

Here is my thought. If you’re a taxpayer and have a BofA account, stop paying it. They have already gotten your money via the government and you no longer owe them a penny.

IMHO

Report this

By Shift, January 16 at 8:30 am #

This doesn’t look or smell like a wedding cake to me.

Report this

By Susanne, January 16 at 8:11 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

It seems that everything done to help the economy benefits the banks. Loan guarantees, Bailout money, buying toxic assest from the banks, increasing government debt to banks.

The banks caused this mess by excessive leveraging, and lending, and then selling these crap pieces of debt paper around the market for more money - inflating the whole economy ready for a massive burst.

Yet the taxpayers are just bailing them out.

Allowing banks going bankrupt would not destroy the economy if people’s savings were protected and new institutions were put in place. Let them rot. Stop the bailouts.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
Chrome Bag - Free Shipping
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.