![]() |
|
||
|
Detroit Bailout Looks UnlikelyPosted on Nov 18, 2008
The chief executives of the Big Three American car companies head to Washington Tuesday along with the head of the United Auto Workers to beg Congress for a bailout that seems less and less probable. Lawmakers are loathe to head back to the bottomless piggy bank, while the White House refuses to slide down the “slippery slope” of letting just anyone take a chunk of that $700 billion.
Advertisement Previous item: Hillary Clinton Is Kind of, Definitely, Maybe (Not) the Next Secretary of State Next item: Retired Military Leaders Denounce 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By Larry A, November 19, 2008 at 12:41 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I have to disagree with tres. There is limited competition for jumbo jets and routers in the world market. With the world economy in free fall who is going to be buying those anyway? Airlines are cutting back on flights, corporations are making due with current infrastructures, where is the demand? Do you think the rest of the world is not impacted tres? You need fuel to fly those jets too. Cisco and the aircraft manufacturers are going to get hurt no matter what else is done. Well run companies will suffer; there is no way around it. You take your best shot at setting things right. If you pass out BILLIONS to the auto makers every business will be in line for theirs.
Despite our crisis we will continue to be the biggest consumer market moving forward at least for 5 - 10 years. What country would want to slug it out with import tariffs against us? Japan? Russia? India? China? I don’t see it and I’d be surprised if you do. They would gripe and get on with selling things to us. If the US is down they are further down. The Ponzi scheme that is the “TARP” is just a black hole. There’s no accountability. Who has those billions paid out so far tres? I’m betting on the Saudis or Chinese. What Hemi suggested is not perfect but it is based on reason and you have offered nothing but criticism.
Report thisBy 123456, November 19, 2008 at 5:01 am #
So they don’t want to give $25 billion to an actually industry that builds things and employs millions, yet they had no problem giving hundreds of billions of dollars to financial institutions that basically just move electronic money around?
Whatever fault the auto industry has in its own problems, it is one of the last remaining REAL industries in a rapidly de-industrialized America, and does need saving.
I suspect that many who want to let it die are the same people who have been behind this de-ndustrialization for the past 30 years.
Report thisBy tres, November 19, 2008 at 1:47 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Hemi,
Tax credit or rebate is good, but import tax is stupid. Foreign countries could impose a tax on imported Jumbo jets, Cisco routers, you name it, the next thing you know the congress will be asked to bail them out. So basically you are asking the government to transfer the pain from failed Detroit auto companies to well run American companies. That’s why it is a stupid idea.
Report thisBy writeon, November 18, 2008 at 7:10 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Why Detroit’s in trouble is that Wallstreet has been running the economy for years and for its benefit. One could simply make far more profit, truly vast, collosal sums, by ‘producing’ money/debt, rather than things. So US manufacturing was sacrificed, was old-fashioned, and most of it was sent abroad.
Intervening to ‘save’ the banks was controversial, some even talked of ‘nationalization’ ‘socialism’ or even a ‘crisis of Capitalism.’ This kind of talk has to be nipped in the bud, or ordinary people might come to the wrong and very dangerous conclusions.
However, stepping in with massive government subsidies for the auto industry really would signal the definitive death of the ‘free market’ or Capitalism. What would be left of it? The self-regulating system would clearly be finished. It would be impossible to argue that the essence of Capitalism still applied, that is, what’s too weak to stand must fall. Take that dogma or ideology and what’s left? Call it State-Capitalism, or the Corporate State, or whatever, but it sure doesn’t have much to do with a free, self-regulating, market!
Report thisBy Marshall, November 18, 2008 at 5:37 pm #
This issue is a quandary for many liberals who a) despise the corporate greed that contributed to the problem, but b) feel the need to support UAW and worker’s rights despite its contribution to the problem.
The right solution is to let nature take its course by letting the auto companies fail. They’ll go into bankruptcy and will be bought by companies that knows how to stay in business. We’ll all get better cars, the overpaid union workers will have to accept wages that reflect reality (like the rest of us), tax payers won’t be on the hook for billions and the government for once again interfering with the private markets.
Report thisBy jobart, November 18, 2008 at 4:52 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
As I watch the so-called “transparency” of these two (Sec’t Treasury and Fed Reserve lackey) “stooges” for a continuation of the status quo, I’m left with one thought and one thought only. In a word .....“purge”. Not the warlike “surge”, the intelligent “PURGE”. As in “be gone”. You spineless elites have shown yourselves to be ruthless, uncaring, bastards. May the existential and, I might add, considerate behavior that all men should wish upon each other be ignored when you are involved in that societal equation and determination.
Report thisHow do you sleep at night, knowing very well that you are full of shit? Do you delude yourselves that you are a “natural “phenomena” of the “evolutionary” man? If so, ok. Based on your level of success, a.k.a. bottom-line, you have the imperical justification in the results achieved. But then, I need to ask, why do you rely on those that believe in a higher, more omnipotent, power to stay retain influence in everyday people’s lives? Can’t get the small % of rich cats to vote, huh? Too much inconvenience for your sainted “butt? I “betcha” that your parents are proud of you. Right? You’ve past the “muster” that you were brought up with. Namely, SCREW THE WEAK !!!
You suck, and I hope that you will have a day of “reckoning” for your anti-humanitarion behavior. A word of “friendly advice”. Make sure to “watch over your shoulder”; notice anyone around you that seems “out of place” and, most of all…watch your family members. Because when things get “nasty”, and if things continue as they’re going, NO ONE WILL BE SAFE !!! No ONE !!! But, mostly, your sorry ass.
By oldrnsin, November 18, 2008 at 4:44 pm #
Hemi, I think you have a logical, practical solution. That’s why they’ll never do it.
Report thisBy SteveL, November 18, 2008 at 4:28 pm #
How much do we spend on Iraq each month?
Report thisBy mud, November 18, 2008 at 2:29 pm #
What should we do to the wall street boys who rip us all off for trillions of dollars?
Naturally, we give then trillions more with no strings attached.
What should we do to the big auto big wigs who fight every safety, efficiency and pollution regulation tooth and nail in the courts? What should we do with an industry that destroys electric trolley lines and sells off the rights of ways? What should we do with a company that builds a great electric vehicle only because the State of California forces them to and then as quickly as possibly crushes the the vehicles (the evidence) that good EVs are actually easy to make?
Well, we need give them gobs of tax dollars so they can keep up the good work.
Thanks Nancy - off the table -
Report thisBy Hemi*, November 18, 2008 at 2:00 pm #
Very simple solution to this nonsense.
First, anyone buying a car or truck manufactured within the United States receives a $5,000 tax write off. $1,500 for a motorcycle. All loan payments on these vehicles become tax deductable. Second, impose a tariff of $2,500 on any imported car or truck. $750 on a motorcycle.
This would give incentive to buy from US based companies as well as for foreign companies to continue building manufacturing facilities here. In this the taxpayers are getting something back from their dollars. More jobs, better competition, increased short-term sales and no need for a bailout. If you don’t survive after that you don’t deserve to. Paulson is robbing us blind. We can’t let this continue.
We would be better backing an upstart with $25 billion rather than simply sticking a finger in the dyke that is the big three. An upstart can hire non-union. What’s wrong with the auto workers being closer to the pack as far as salaries and benefits? We’re not talking slave wages here. Imagine them having to contribute something toward healthcare and perhaps… shudder… save for their retirement. I don’t know about you folks but I have no union, I contribute heavily to my medical plan and have no company contribution toward retirement. And who the f*** says anyone’s guaranteed a “retirement”? An upstart can also be tied to transparent earnings and management. By the way, Daimler/Chrysler is not a US manufacturer. Ford and GM are no better with many of their facilities in Mexico and Canada. F them all.
Report thisBy Purple Girl, November 18, 2008 at 1:21 pm #
First Paulson with his 2 1/2 page Death Threat and now the Big 3.
Report thishere’s a Better idea….Freeze & seize all assets from the Top brass of these Corps and their ‘Dealers’ the Oil Industry. Both have been making killings since they have kept US addicted to their Bosses M.E. Oil.
Provide a net under the Workers, but Prosecute the top brass for TREASON. Not only did they ignore Our demands for more fuel efficient or alternative fuels…They increased the flow of Oil products directly into Our veins ( SUV’s, More Plastic parts). It’s not as though they did Know that such dependence could realign the Global power structure, rendering US subsevient to the ME Oil Royals. It’s not like there were NO other countries building innovative cars. It’s not like they couldn’t figure out if American Workers can’t afford the cars they build that means our economy is on a Downward Spiral.
This has been a 30 yr Conspiracy to not only make US obliged to the M.E. royals, but also to lower the standard living of the american worker thus make us a more affordable Commodity for their ‘bankers’. Bringing the Standard of living Up for the other global Markets has NEVER been the Goal…it has been to bring down the ameircan Labor market to match the Third World labor costs.Where did you think the idea to recreate a Feudalistic Caste system ‘Trickle Down’ came from…The Multinational corps attempting to starve out the American Worker.
So we’ll hand over a life line, but we want the Conspirators in return…Hand Over the ‘leaders’ so we can arrest, Prosecute and Punish them PERSONALLY!They have committed Economic TREASON!
By oldrnsin, November 18, 2008 at 12:29 pm #
Exxon Mobil and the other oil companies posted tens of billions of dollars profit last year due in part to the gas guzzling GM, Ford and Chrysler products. Did anyone see the documentary “Who Killed the Electric Car?” Check out these: http://www.ev1.org/ and http://www.whokilledtheelectriccar.com. The oil companies and the big three have collaborated for years to hinder meaningful progress on the development of anything other than a gas operated internal combustion engine. Let the bastards now bail each other out of the quagmire they themselves created. Failing that, I totally agree with HoosierLiberal’s assessment.
Report thisBy Jim Yell, November 18, 2008 at 11:38 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The auto industry wants to get their hands in the cookie jar, because they claim they are short of cash to run the companies. What they don’t mention is the huge investment they have always had in asian car manufactories, which means they have for decades been positioned in a win/win situation. This explains a lot how they could be so pig headed and unresponsive to evolving needs of the economy and American Employment.
Perhaps this should be identified for what it is treason against the country. Perhaps we should consider seizing the companies and selling them to people who really want to run them correctly, responsibly. I am sure if we offer some protection for a number of years while they make the necessary environmental and design changes there are people who would like to take them in hand.
You think treason is too strong a word? Isn’t treason deliberate aid to a countries enemies and destroying the country’s economy, surely should meet that definition.
Report thisBy G.Anderson, November 18, 2008 at 11:34 am #
Conservative leaders have a penchant for making exactly the wrong decision at each critical moment.
They do this while falsely claiming to be protecting the free market. It’s a little like a pimp claiming to be a virgin.
It’s quite likely that Conservatives want GM to fail, as a parting shot to the new administration. They would rather destroy GM than let it fall into enemy hands.
GM’s situation should not be an opportunity to wage political warfare. But instead a test, of how much bi-partisanship the Republican party can muster, now that they have wrecked the economy.
How much unemployment can this country endure? Instead of unemployement for the workers, how about unemployment for management instead?
Report thisBy felicity, November 18, 2008 at 11:31 am #
This isn’t the first time Detroit itself has been responsible for its impending demise. Way back when, the Big Three kept turning out chrome-laden, gas guzzling behemoths in spite of the fact that Americans wanted smaller, lighter, cheaper, longer-lasting cars. The Japanese and Germans obliged then - and are still obliging.
Later it was revealed that Detroit had been loathe to give up its behemoth productions because the profit margin on them was huge compared to that on smaller, lighter, cheaper cars. Greed yet again taking precedence over sanity?
(Of course, Washington has consistently been willing to support Detroit’s foolishness like more recently passing a tax law which allowed some companies, a minimum number of employees determined their eligibility, to write $75,000 per purchased Hummer, bought for company use, off its taxable income.)
Report thisBy hoosierliberal, November 18, 2008 at 10:49 am #
Basically, the Detroit 3 belatedly has quit pandering to the big truck, SUV crowd. Too late of course, which is the story of the D3 and the UAW, of which I’m a retired member. The union, which always should have served as a counterpoint to the companies, became a partner with the companies in pushing “the bigger is better” mantra. I was in a production meeting in early 2005 when there was a lot of talk about raising CAFE standards for the industry, and especially trucks. Management sent their usual company buffoon in to tell us to write our congressman in opposition to these new higher standards. Instead of the UAW having someone in the meeting explaining how this could have long-term negative effects, the union committeeman in attendance used the occasion to whip up a frenzy in support of what the management toadie had said. A few days later at our local union meeting, our local’s VP also used the platform he had to again whip up the same sort of response from the membership in attendance. My opinion: (1) Clean out the upper levels of GM and D3 management. (2) Gettelfinger and his cronies must all resign and all appointed positions within the UAW and GM/Chrysler/FordUAW Joint Activities should be abolished (3) a totally new board of directors should be put in place (4) a government oversight committee for the American auto companies and unions should be put in place to regulate how the companies are run and how the unions interact with said companies. That said, I think the D3 should receive government aid tied to all of the conditions mentioned above and several environmental conditions not mentioned. Just my opinion.
Report thisBy Fahrenheit 451, November 18, 2008 at 10:03 am #
What is it going to take to get our 3 major car companies to quit pandering to the idiots that want to drive bigger, faster, stupider, gas guzzling monsters? If it weren’t for the millions of people employed by these morons; I say let the bastards fail. Let them eat the fruits of their blatant greed and incomprehensible stupidity. This ignorant government and citizenry couldn’t even read the bold letters on the wall back in the 70’s! Too dumb to live!!! Screw em all! But really; regulate the shit out of these stupid bastards and save their sorry asses. Fire the decision makers and get some responsible “LEADERSHIP”, not greedy sycophants! God help us, we certainly can’t help ourselves.
Report this