LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 22, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Intelligentsia Against Intelligence

Throw the Money Changers Out of the Temple

Obama's Job Approval Slips Below 50 Percent

Battlefield in the War of Ideas

Claire Wasserman on Europe's Islamic Immigrants

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Enough G-2 Talk Already
Despite Subsidies, Class Sizes Rise in California Schools

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Freedom’s Fight: Part II

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Bad Money

Bad Money

By Kevin Phillips
$17.13

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Gingrich: Bailout Plan ‘Un-American’

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Sep 28, 2008
Gingrich
abcnews.go.com

Newt Gingrich, pictured, points to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s background at Goldman Sachs as one source of the problem with Paulson’s perspective on Wall Street’s woes.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson certainly has his Democratic detractors, but they aren’t the only ones who have some serious doubts about his controversial $700-billion bailout plan. In an appearance on ABC’s “This Week With George Stephanopolous” on Sunday, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich blasted Paulson’s plan, calling it “un-American” and even opining that Paulson should have resigned.


ABC News’ “Political Radar” blog:

Gingrich even expressed concern with Paulson’s connections to Wall Street.  The treasury secretary served as the chairman of a major global investment banking and securities firm before joining the Bush administration.

“You have the former Chairman of Goldman Sachs asking for 700 billion dollars, and in his initial request, asking for it in such an un-American way that I think he should have resigned,” said Gingrich. “I think Paulson has terminally misunderstood the nature of the American system. Not just no review, no judicial review, no congressional accountability. Give me 700 billion dollars, 700 BILLION dollars! ‘I’ll be glad to spend it for you.’  That’s a centralization of power that is totally un-American.”

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Folktruther, October 4, 2008 at 6:36 pm #

Ntionalizing the banks, Anarcissie is different from corporatizing the govenrement, the opposite in fact.  It is a question of who is to be master, what communists call “Who Whom.”  Who is in control.  The state capitalism of the Chinese, and even the Europeans, is more efficient than unregulated corporatism.

but you are probably right, corporate rule is most likely what we will get.

NATIONALIZE THE BANKS!  TORTURE THE BANKERS, THEN HANG THEM!  Conceivable these threats don’t do much good, but they make me feel better.

Report this

By Anarcissie, October 3, 2008 at 12:39 pm #

Folktruther: ‘That’s just it, Anarcissie, This bailout is the first in a series of ripoffs that is turning hte US into a third world country.  All done in the same way, hurry up and pass legislation before anyone reads it and discovers its implications.

NATIONALIZE THE BANKS!  HANG THE BANKERS! ...’

Actually, I think they are going to nationalize the banks, so to speak, or rather, corporatize the government.  Paulson was quite annoyed when the $700B he had ordered up wasn’t delivered immediately and fumed about the inefficiencies of the political process, that is, what passes for democracy in the United States.  No doubt this will be fixed in the future by handing a book of blank checks over to our lords and masters.

I don’t know why people put up with this, but they do.

Report this

By Folktruther, October 3, 2008 at 11:59 am #

That’s just it, Anarcissie, This bailout is the first in a series of ripoffs that is turning hte US into a third world country.  All done in the same way, hurry up and pass legislation before anyone reads it and discovers its implications.

      NATIONALIZE THE BANKS!  HANG THE BANKERS!

Alright, I am willing to compromise.  Don’t hang the bankers.

Report this

By thebeerdoctor, October 1, 2008 at 5:00 pm #

Face it, the Democratic leadership are not Democrats. True Democrats still exist but they are nearly always ignored by these corporate lackeys, including their Presidential ticket. Consider Joseph Biden. His great contribution to this current economic mess was his MBNA sponsorship of “bankruptcy reform”. An odious designation for a law that makes citizens even more beholden to corporate. Put that up along side his war on drugs legislation, his pro Zionist “expert” foreign policy credentials, and no one has the nerve to ask why Biden is considered liberal.
This economic nine eleven (John McCain’s designation not mine) provides a convenient smoke screen for all the other robberies and frauds. The Democratic Leadership chooses to ignore the philosophical vision that defines what a Democrat is suppose to be, and instead chooses to whip the mule team and drive the wagon further into right wing, Republican mud.

Report this

By Anarcissie, October 1, 2008 at 3:23 pm #

There is no way a Republican is going to be elected in New York’s 14th Congressional District.  I did write to my Congresswoman, however, and told her why the Bailout is evil.  Who knows?  Anyway, I don’t think it’s going to make a lot of difference.  The U.S. government has already manufactured many hundreds of billions of dollars of funny money and it’s going to take a while for them to realize that the solution to problems caused by funny money is not more funny money.

Report this

By Folktruther, October 1, 2008 at 3:02 pm #

You’re proably again right, Anarcissie.  What is astonishing is that the Dem leaders are going to the RIGHT in their next attaempt, to gain votes of the Gops, while counting on the servility of the Dems.  They are giving more tax breaks to business owners.

They are triangulating, using Gop votes to pass Dem leader legislation, as Clinton did to gut welfare, the unions, and pass Nafta.  There is obviously no end to it.

Stan Goff, who has gone to the right the past few years, suggests voting for the Gop or Dem opposition of incombants who vote for this ripoff.

Report this

By Anarcissie, October 1, 2008 at 9:58 am #

I doubt if their resolve will last, unfortunately.  There was apparently mass public anger and revulsion at Paulson’s bailout proposal and I think the Republicans have less of a feeling of being entitled to high office than establishment Democrats, especially this year, so they are a bit more sensitive to the feelings of the voters. 

A better-decorated fix will now be put in, I imagine.

Report this

By Folktruther, September 30, 2008 at 7:22 pm #

It turns out you were right, Anarcissie, it was the Gops that rejected it.  so far.

Report this

By Anarcissie, September 30, 2008 at 3:42 pm #

I’m rather impressed that Congress got up on its hind legs and showed its teeth for once.  No thanks to its leadership.

Report this

By thebeerdoctor, September 30, 2008 at 3:34 am #

Monday’s defeat of the “rescue package” is remarkable in that the leadership of the “two” parties could not control their members from voting for themselves. As Marcy Kaptur so aptly put it, in Congress, the only oracle is the Constitution.
A very important event. Congress refused to do what they were told to do.

Report this

By don knutsen, September 29, 2008 at 7:42 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Why is someone like the Newt even being asked his opinion. Why is he and a guy like K. Rove on these shows as pundits as if there opinion carries weight. These are the same individuals who enthusiastically created the hyper-partisanship that is our non-functioning Congress today. These people have caused so much more harm most, have both been shown the door after things had finally gotten too hot for them, and both operate above the same law that would put anyone of us behind bars had we not the throng of lawyers and political machinery they did to avoid any accountability. Maybe we should seek our answers from individuals without their corrupt agenda , but who genuinely care about this country of ours. Ya Think ?

Report this

By Hulk2008, September 29, 2008 at 4:37 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

It was supposed to be a “Democrat Year”  - a wave of change that was going to sweep out many of the GOP traditionalists and sweep in new fresh Dem faces.  How does one stem such a tide ?  Create a giant wave of one’s own making - one formed by the financial industry whose very future was being threatened by a “progressive” takeover. 
    To rescue McCain and his fellow Repubs, a September Surprise had to be created - and here it is. How did McSame bring his flagging campaign back from the dead last year?  Whatever it took - spouting phony catch phrases like “Country Before Self” - and lurching so quickly and completely to the Right that his neck is still stuck in one place (that’s why he was unable to look at Obama during the first debate). 
  John McWhatever-It-Takes rides again - and the electorate will gobble up his pap once again.

Report this

By same as it ever was, September 29, 2008 at 3:26 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

The Wall Street Bailout Bill:
Bush McCain Obama et al.

The Realignment Of American Politics:
Anderson Baldwin Carter Choate Clemente Gonzalez Gravel Kaptur Kucinich McKinney Nader Paul Perot Sheehan Ventura

Report this

By thebeerdoctor, September 29, 2008 at 2:55 pm #

As the late Fela Kuti said: “I must look and laugh.” The bailout goes down to defeat in the house, and now the leaders of the sausage factory have to “regroup” to figure out some way to get this dog to hunt. The craven Republican leadership, unable to convince their own party’s brethren to go along with this financial obscenity, now choose to throw blame on the House Speaker for her partisan speech. What a crock of nothing. Here was a $700 billion giveaway that 70% of the people are opposed to and these bastards claim they are doing the work of the people. As Dennis Kucinich observed, stating his objections to this legislation, that this all about helping Wall Street at the expense of everyone else. And what was also remarkable, was that a quite a few conservative Republicans noticed the same thing.

Report this

By Folktruther, September 29, 2008 at 12:28 pm #

i agree, Anarcissie, the Dems have been utterly shameless.  Pelosi throwing herself in the front of the pack leading the bailout sellouts is a new low is a sequence of lows.  A display of utter contempt for the American people.  And right before a primary election as well as a general election.

Report this

By P. T., September 29, 2008 at 11:49 am #

Seeing that the rich have their wants met is very American.

Report this

By Frank Nelson, September 29, 2008 at 11:28 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Here is an excellent video on the bailout mess. It cites hearings back in 2004 where this problem was raised and they fought ANY regulation on Fannie. Certian members of congress actually said there is no problem here!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs

Report this

By Anarcissie, September 29, 2008 at 10:36 am #

Folktruther:
Do you think, Anarcissie, that the Gops are really against the bill, or just making noises before they vote for it.  Gingrich said that if he were still in the House, he would vote for it.  Of course it is true that they don’t gleefully support Bush like the Dems do.

The only big-ticket politicians I have observed to be in overt opposition to the bailout swindle have been Republicans.  Maybe they are faking, but they are at least giving us some respect by making the right noises before they roll over.

There are plenty of Democrats, liberals, leftists, etc. in vigorous opposition but apparently they have, once again, been sold out lock, stock and barrel by their smirking leadership.  I shouldn’t be, but I am amazed yet again by the cynicism and impudence of this performance.

Report this

By thebeerdoctor, September 29, 2008 at 10:21 am #

“Faced by failure of credit they have proposed only the lending of more money. Stripped of the lure of profit by which to induce our people to follow their false leadership, they have resorted to exhortations, pleading tearfully for restored confidence. They know only the rules of a generation of self seekers. They have no vision, and when there is no vision the people perish.”
Franklin Delano Roosevelt, March 4, 1933

http://www.streetalker.com/

Report this

By Greg Bacon, September 29, 2008 at 9:58 am #

For Newt to come out opposed to this welfare plan for Wall Street shows how much of a scheming, conniving, no good SOB Newt is.

He’s only barking to help his fellow Republicans do well come November.

He was in the House when the laws were changed to benefit commodity speculators and Wall Street banks, but now he’s singing a different tune.

Don’t wake up America.

Keep watching FUX SPEWS channel and “Dancing with the Stars.”

And we’ll get danced into our own financial grave.

Report this

By Big B, September 29, 2008 at 8:40 am #

My grandmother would say we keep throwing bad money after bad money.

Oh wait! It doesn’t really count, because it’s not REAL money we the people are sending to wall street. We put it on our credit card! You know, the one with no limit and a 29% interest rate.

Remember the 1929 crash. It was caused by private investors and companies who bought stock ON CREDIT!
They leveraged their homes, properties, and future assets to try and make fast money on the market.
Is that not exactly what we are doing right now by extending our already huge goddamn national debt on some stock sceme?

And now this morning Citigroup is buying up the faultering Wakovia. When this is all said and done there will be only a few banks left, and they will have the federal reserve and the treasury dept by the balls. The new mantra of the banking industry is a simple one, “you have to save us, or we’ll take you down with us!”

Report this

By thebeerdoctor, September 29, 2008 at 6:47 am #

Overnight, on BBC world radio, I heard investor Jim Rodgers calling in from Asia. A man who tried to warn this country that Bernanke and Paulson were incompetent, but no one listened then, and no one is listening now. Anyway, Rodgers said last night that the $700 billion bailout, uh rescue package, is like putting a band-aide on a cancerous wound. He predicted that within 2 years, the entire shit house will come down.

http://www.alternet.org/workplace/100700/

Report this

By thebeerdoctor, September 29, 2008 at 6:10 am #

The eye of Newt can an opportunistic bastard, as long as anyone actually takes him seriously. The gravy train known as Cobb County Georgia, is the greatest recipient of federal aid. So the eye of Newt, who represented that district, knows something about the American way of sucking up the butter.
Putting this idiot aside, when it comes to the bailout, that is now being called the rescue package, take a look on page 45-13 (B) DEBATE:
“Debate on the joint resolution, and or all debatable motions and appeals in connection therewith, shall be limited to not more than 10 hours, which shall be divided equally between the majority and minority leaders or their designess. A motion further to limit debate is in order and not debatable.”
Such language reveals the obvious: this bloody ugly sausage is about to be rammed through.

Report this

By gianfalco, September 29, 2008 at 4:47 am #

Dollars on the burning dollar…

Report this

By G.T.Gerrard, September 29, 2008 at 1:47 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Before coming to OUR government for recapitalization I would demand that they write down their losses, promptly.  And issue warrants to the government.  Thus getting equity so that there is some upside for US the taxpayer.

  This holds the instutions responsible and our government into an owner.

  If taxpayers are put-on-the-hook without anything in return it will be a grave mistake.  The American public will not support a plan leaving the former shareholders with anything.

  No Generation Has The Right To Contract Debts Greater Than Can Be Paid Off During The Course Of Its Own Existance!

Please PHONE your Senators & Represenative Monday morning and express your concern that bad debt needs to be written off BEFORE the government hands over obscene amounts of money!

Report this

By Larry, September 29, 2008 at 1:17 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Even though I hate giving money to bad investment by banks and investors.  I have considered that my paying $10.00 a day to keep my monthly income coming through, accessing my checking account, getting money through the ATM, and paying my bills on time as an acceptable price to having nothing coming in.

Report this

By GW=MCHammered, September 29, 2008 at 1:04 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Ever write fiction? This is script. The whole Bush ‘thing’ is formula.

Report this

By Louise, September 29, 2008 at 12:44 am #

“Gingrich: Bailout Plan ‘Un-American’”

I find it really hard to swallow that Gingrich, one of the most un-American creatures that ever darkened the halls of Congress has the putz to call ANYTHING un-American!

Geez! What does it take to make these vile, old, Constitution shredding, bile spewing slugs GO AWAY?

Yuk and double yuk!
Somebody poor salt on him!

Report this

By Eric L. Prentis, September 28, 2008 at 11:09 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

This terrible bailout of Wall Street shows the American people that the bankers always get the money first, regardless of their crimes. Like Enron, these banking malefactors should be bankrupt and in jail. Instead, the Democrats, including Sen. Christopher Dodd, Sen. Chuck Schumer and Rep. Barney Frank, kowtow to the banking industry and to the wrong-headed President Bush. There is no assurance that these same greedy bankers being bailed out will use the taxpayers money to double down on their lousy bets rather than help the economy. We should let the market work by separating the good bankers from the bad bankers and then inject the $700 billion dollars, now is too early and is just an attempt by Paulson and Bernanke to save the Republicans in the November elections.

Report this

By halapeño, September 28, 2008 at 10:39 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I have had my doubts about the need for this bailout package and how it is going to affect the average taxpayer but if the Newtster is against it, that pretty much sells it to me.

Next to George W. Bush, I cannot think of another person who has done more to harm our great country than Newt Gingrich.

Go away!  We don’t care what you think!

Report this

By Diogenes, September 28, 2008 at 9:30 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Newt is an expert when it is time to resign

Report this

By Mudbones, September 28, 2008 at 9:26 pm #

Anarcissie, do you really believe that?

Report this

By Folktruther, September 28, 2008 at 9:13 pm #

Do you think, Anarcissie, that the Gops are really against the bill, or just making noises before they vote for it.  Gingrich said that if he were still in the House, he would vote for it.  Of course it is true that they don’t gleefully support Bush like the Dems do.

Report this

By ApprxAm, September 28, 2008 at 9:07 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Truth Dig, really? Newt Gingrich has an ad on this site? I can’t swallow Liberal BS and take his hipocracy in the same day.

Report this

By ApprxAm, September 28, 2008 at 9:02 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Dammmmit. I hate agreeing with Pewuk Grinch. That said and done…he did everything he could today on ABC to deny any responsibility as a RePugNaCon/Lie-berterrorist for allowing Wall Street and the banks to strangle America since Reagan/BushI/Clinton/Cheney.

Now that Bush and the Investment Bankers are strong-arming the American Treasury, he wants to talk about what’s American? I bet Sorry Failin for VP is All-American.

Report this

By Anarcissie, September 28, 2008 at 8:11 pm #

Apparently only Republicans are capable of resisting the bailout swindle.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.