![]() |
|
||
|
Obama: Ratings GoldPosted on Aug 29, 2008
If you’re going to be accused of being a celebrity, you might as well enjoy some of the perks, too, as Democratic nominee Barack Obama did on Thursday night, when some 40 milion Americans tuned in to watch his momentous acceptance speech at Invesco Field.
Advertisement CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
We just got faster!
Our site is growing, and we’ve upgraded our servers to bring you a better, faster Truthdig experience.
We’re thrilled with our improvement — but it’s added a lot to our costs. Please help us to keep things snappy and make sure you have instant access to thousands of in-depth Truthdig articles, interviews, videos and cartoons.
Please chip in today with a gift to keep us moving forward. Then check out the site for yourself!
By Caroline, August 31, 2008 at 10:07 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I enjoyed watching the whole convention by the internet streaming with the dem. convention site. It was perfect. no pundits, all the action and speeches, including all the underlings that did not get prime time. Dennis Kucinich sp? did a fantastic “wake up” America speech. Jesse Jackson Jr was very memorable and noteworthy. John Kerry was fantastic and i hope his comments continue to be heard in the media contrasting the senator McCain and the candidate. On and on, there were many people who listened by radio (NPR) who were not counted and I am eternally grateful to the Obama campaign for making the convention so assessible with their media and tech knowledge.
Report thisBy Gawd, August 31, 2008 at 3:02 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Hmm. Well, apparently most of that gold rated 40 million who tuned in to watch Barack Obama on Thursday night weren’t all that impressed with what they saw and heard.
The Gallup Daily Tracking Poll clearly shows that Obama got his bounce immediately after Hillary Clinton’s speech, a bit more after Bill Clinton’s speech…and then nothing more after Obama’s own speech. Zero. Not one single digit more.
http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08gen.htm#Gallup
Hillary and Bill pulled some additional numbers for Barack after their big nights…but Barack pulled nothing more for himself after his big night.
Report thisBy Stephen Smoliar, August 30, 2008 at 2:46 pm #
There are many ways to interpret the hard data behind this story, several of which I have tried to address at:
http://therehearsalstudio.blogspot.com/2008/08/beyond-entertainment.html
Report thisBy thebeerdoctor, August 30, 2008 at 12:55 pm #
The pageant government is one thing, the permanent government is quite another. The best thing that can be said about the presidency is that it sets a national cultural tone. The worst thing that can said about the presidency is that it sets a national cultural tone. How quickly the politics of hope can morph into the politics of fear. Of course I maybe wrong on this, but I do think that a majority of voters reach their decision on who to vote for through emotional judgments. Why else would so much rhetoric and images be employed and in so many different ways?
Report thisHope and Fear are two punches straight to the gut. It is foolish to speaker of a candidate as desperate. Politics by its very nature, is a very desperate business, always.
Politicians are the motivational speakers of the bewildered.
By Outraged, August 30, 2008 at 2:28 am #
Article quote: “The ratings dwarfed the audience for the Summer Olympics and the season finale of American Idol in May, and added to what was already a sense of buoyancy within the Obama campaign that the night had gone better than planned.”
Dwarfed the Olympics AND American Idol….hmmm…
It seems to me people ARE sincere in their effort to find out where their country is headed. Too bad this gala, better know as the Democratic Convention, was only one small sampling of that endeavor.
For those who would like a broader view than just campaign rhetoric, try this article:
“Long gone are the days when the selection of a vice-presidential candidate by one of the two major big business parties involved a complex balancing act between various institutional forces. In the Democratic Party, this would have involved consultations with trade union officials, civil rights organizations, congressional leaders and the heads of particularly powerful state and urban political machines.
Today, neither party has any substantial popular base. In both parties there is only one true constituency: the financial aristocracy that dominates economic and political life and controls the mass media, and whose interests determine government policy, both foreign and domestic. The selection of Biden, the senator from a small state with only three electoral votes, whose own presidential bids have failed miserably for lack of popular support, underscores the immense chasm separating the entire political establishment from the broad mass of the American people.
Obama has selected Biden to provide reassurance that, whatever populist rhetoric may be employed for electoral purposes in the fall campaign, the wealth and privileges of the ruling elite and the geo-strategic aims of US imperialism will be the single-minded concerns of a Democratic administration.”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9974
Report this