LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 8, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

House Passes Health Care Bill

Steve Fraser on the Crisis of Capitalism

Sen. George McGovern on the Presidency From Lincoln to Obama

'Daily Show' Insta-Classic: What Lurks Within Glenn Beck?

Happy Birthday, Pat Tillman

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Human Smoke

Human Smoke

By Nicholson Baker
$19.80

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Maliki Promises to Stand Firm on Sovereignty

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Aug 25, 2008
DoD photo

Speaking to tribal leaders in Iraq’s capital, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki pledged not to sign a deal with the U.S. that didn’t include a withdrawal date. He also said he would not accept “absolute immunity for anybody, whether Iraqis or foreigners.” That’s a sticking point for the Bush administration, although a draft deal is said to include limited immunity for U.S. soldiers, along with a pullout date of 2011.


BBC:

He said no agreement would be signed that did not respect Iraqi sovereignty, Reuters reports.

“An open time limit is not acceptable in any security deal that governs the presence of the international forces,” he said.

He also said no foreigners would be given full legal immunity. The US has been trying to include immunity from prosecution in the Iraqi courts for its soldiers as part of the deal.

“We will not accept to put the lives of our sons on the line by guaranteeing absolute immunity for anybody, whether Iraqis or foreigners,” Mr Maliki said. “The sanctity of Iraqi blood should be respected.”

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Big B, August 25, 2008 at 9:46 pm #

Good thing we won’t be there for 100 years, after all, the oil will run out long before that.

Report this

By 123456, August 25, 2008 at 8:03 pm #

This is deceptive, as he talks of “sovereignty”, which si meaningless since techinically Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and 1960’s South Vietnam were all “sovereign” as well.

Further, a U.S. pull-out is also meaningless, as it wouldn’t necessarily stop the U.S. from being “invited” to keep a few military bases there to help “protect Iraq Syria and Iran”, again much like the above cases.

Report this

By PatrickHenry, August 25, 2008 at 7:42 pm #

Good for him.  Tell the Americans to get the F### out.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Click here to learn more about Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.