LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 23, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

A Call to Action

Bizarre, Apparently Jihadist Slaying in London (Video)

Hell on Earth for Greeks

Oklahoma Needs Help, Not Ideology

Revenge of the Bear: Russia Strikes Back in Syria

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
 * NEW! * A Call to Action
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
The John Lennon Letters

The John Lennon Letters

Edited by Hunter Davies
$29.99

Breaking the Sound Barrier

Breaking the Sound Barrier

By Amy Goodman
$10.80

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Study: U.S. HIV Infection Rates Drastically Underreported

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Aug 2, 2008
AIDS ribbon
thecommonwealth.org

The United States is in far worse shape when it comes to HIV infection rates than researchers previously thought, according to a new study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that attributes the whopping 40 percent adjustment to more precise research methods.


The New York Times:

The United States has significantly underreported the number of new H.I.V. infections occurring nationally each year, with a study released here on Saturday showing that the annual infection rate is 40 percent higher than previously estimated.

The study, conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, found that 56,300 people became newly infected with H.I.V in 2006, compared with the 40,000 figure the agency has cited as the recent annual incidence of the disease.

The findings confirm that H.I.V., the virus that causes AIDS, has its greatest effect among gay and bisexual men of all races (53 percent of all new infections) and among African-American men and women.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By samosamo, August 4, 2008 at 12:18 pm Link to this comment

By cyrena, August 4 at 2:52 am

I stand corrected again, partly due to the wee wee hours this morning when I posted those comments, but yeah, I do remember now that is was an observational thing about the blacks in tuskegee and just about no doubt as to see how syphilis could be used as a biological weapon. That raises a whole heap of conjecture especially for the people in this country where it can make one wonder if this disease is not being attented to by the cdc as should be which I believe I posted the fact that in the town I am from not too long ago a bunch of billboards began to have ‘Syphilis Outbreak Warning’ which most likely was a legitimate warning for people to be aware and get checked out.
That this government and the military have come up with so many nefarious schemes, it is hard to sort them out but most necessary to look into for a truth. I for one for so long trusted our government as to give them a pass that now I am more apt to put the ‘onus’ on them to prove innocence.

Report this

By cyrena, August 4, 2008 at 3:52 am Link to this comment

Samosamo, I was going to respond to this part of an earlier post from you, but didn’t have time, at that particular moment. And, since then, you’ve had a chance to review all of the stuff from Kellina, so it’s actually better now, since it was a point connected to her response to you. On this:

•  “..But I still don’t put it past our current government to have an underhanded scheme ongoing just by the news(if it is true)of a 40% descrepency in the number of cases. Don’t forget the Tuskegee, Alabama syphilis infection tests done to the black people during the early 1900s.”

I *do* understand your reasonable paranoia, and as Kellina mentioned, it isn’t that this government isn’t truly nefarious. But in respect to a ‘conspiracy’ and the comparison to the Tuskegee Experiment, there is an important distinction, which is relates to what Kellina meant in saying that there was no such thing as an “AIDS virus” for the government to intentionally release.

In reality, the government didn’t “intentionally infect” those men in the Tuskegee Experiment either, though it certainly didn’t make what they *did* do, any less a despicable conspiracy of sorts. RATHER, the men contacted the age-old, centuries-old syphilis disease, (I guess you call it a disease) and of course instead of TREATING them for it, (which was easily accomplished at the time) they failed to tell them what was wrong with them, and instead used them to follow by way of experimentation, so they could watch and observe the progress of the untreated infection, and more IMPORTANTLY, wait until they were dead, to examine the internal effects of the disease. It was the most horrifically callous thing imaginable, for which there are no words to describe, and of course we know that they were used as guinea pigs in this fashion, because they were black. 

Be that as it may, this STILL was not a case of the government deliberately concocting a specific strain of something deadly, and then intentionally infecting a specific racial or other group of people with it.

Now I remember back in the original sort of information being put out back in the 80’s, when AIDS first became so ‘known’ to so much of the American population. At the time, high risk groups were designated as gays, intravenous drug users, hemophiliacs, and for some strange reason, it seems like I remember them including Albinos in the mix as well. (I have no idea why Albinos). But all of the others share some common characteristics based on an exchange of bodily fluids, specifically blood. Hemophiliacs would have a compromised immune system in terms of their blood, and while I’m not a medical person by any stretch, I do carry the sickle cell anemia TRAIT, which leaves me prone to anemia from blood loss quicker than it would someone without it. I learned that in a couple of scary experiences.

In the decades since then, we’ve come to know more, and realize now that ANYONE with a compromised immune system, is far more likely to develop AIDS from the HIV virus, than those who might have the virus, but otherwise have more overall health. 

So, stay away from the hard drugs, avoid needles that have been used by anyone else, (that should be easy enough, even flu shots are disposal one-time operations) eat right, and keep your immune system in good order. As long as you don’t have any vampire tendencies, you should be fine. (advice from a NON-MD wink )

Report this

By samosamo, August 4, 2008 at 12:55 am Link to this comment

kellina,

Another of my faults, not going through all replies or comments to change my position, which is the reason the economist John Maynard Keynes gave to someone who asked him why he had changed is mind on a certain position, Keynes: When I get new information I change my position, what sir do you do?’
I looked through your links and found a whole world of info that is quite contrary to the ‘popular’ notion of the aids issue as I understood it. Looks more to be a health and nutrition issue with a mix of common but deadly diseases. And I think from my first post that you replied to I will still have to stand by the conspiracy line even though the whole aids/hiv thing isn’t what the government makes it to be and that I think you are correct in it is not the consiracy I orginally thought, as a matter of fact the correction makes it more irreprehensible of the government.

Report this

By samosamo, August 4, 2008 at 12:07 am Link to this comment

By kellina, August 3 at 6:52 am #

I just scrolled down to your link to the cartoons and yeah, each one is worth at least a 1000 words that would probably never give it justice.

Report this

By samosamo, August 4, 2008 at 12:04 am Link to this comment

By Kellina, August 3 at 5:16 pm #

Thanks, as much as I want to comment with emotion and usually do too much, it is good to realize the ‘why’ of all the changes I have to make to some of my comments before I deem it ready to ‘submit’ and even then find out I should have just kept quiet. But that is not a real option at all.

Report this

By Kellina, August 3, 2008 at 6:16 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

By cyrena, August 3 at 3:03 pm #

Samosamo writes:

“.. I have to admit to an ignorance of HIV & AIDS and as others on this site know I appreciate upgrading my ignorance so I can either discuss in an intelligent manner or keep my mouth shut…”

And…THIS is why we love you! smile (or at least I do).


I agree! Same to you, Cyrena. Keep that open mind.

k

Report this

By cyrena, August 3, 2008 at 4:03 pm Link to this comment

Samosamo writes:

“.. I have to admit to an ignorance of HIV & AIDS and as others on this site know I appreciate upgrading my ignorance so I can either discuss in an intelligent manner or keep my mouth shut…”

And…THIS is why we love you! smile (or at least I do).

But then, that’s ‘cause I’m of the same mindset. When I don’t know stuff, I like to ask questions and/or research it to find out..IF it’s a particular topic of interest to me, or one of many components in the whole that we have to deal with.

There is of course an INFINITE amount of knowledge out there, and not even the most brilliant among us can ever be expected to know more than the tiniest fraction. Still, there are always going to be, (I hope) people who are indeed more knowledgeable than others on certain issues and experts in all of the fields. What we can gain from their concentrated knowledge AND experience, is invaluable.

Now that doesn’t mean that we can expect to ‘upgrade’ to that *expert* level on every single topic in the world, (or I can’t, and don’t want to) but moderate upgrades by way of shared information are much appreciated, eh?

So I’m like Samosamo, and I’m thanking Kellina, since I’ve so far learned more than I previously knew in reference to HIV/AIDS in just these few posts.

Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, August 3, 2008 at 9:05 am Link to this comment

Again, what this report states as new news, I knew through intuitive illumination and common sense.

Let me explain a little! Governments, especially our governments of late, are in the business of misinformation and misleading propaganda, all of which helps them to control and manipulate the unscrupulous masses.

Based on this general principle, any piece of statistics that comes from the governments and/or big corporations is only half truths at best! For example, Exxon-Mobil lately reported an 11 billion quarterly profit; if you multiply this figure by 2 then you might get closer to the real figure!

Report this

By kellina, August 3, 2008 at 7:52 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

here are some really poignant/funny/sad cartoon/images:

http://www.rense.com/wtcsplshpage.htm

k

Report this

By Kellina, August 3, 2008 at 6:49 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

You don’t get it—there is no “AIDS virus,” so the US government, as nefarious as it is, did not “release” it deliberately to infect the populace.

Our government is apparently creating and profiting from terrorism (trying to extract oil/gas lease signatures at gunpoint, torturing and killing those who refuse, in many of the “stans” besides Afghanistan), using depleted uranium in its wars, DU which is the gift that keeps on giving (via birth defects in future generations of civilians and soldiers, even our soldiers), and on the verge of imminent war against Iran, whose done nothing but switched from dollars to euros to sell oil.

Our country seems to be run by corporate interests—which trump public health every time. That AZT got hurried through during the Reagan administration doesn’t surprise me. But the US has been kowtowing to corporate interests at least since the 1950’s—look at virtually all of south and central America. The CDC is run by a rotating group of pharmaceutical executives. They covered over the thimerosal (mercury) and autism link (so mercury is still in flu vaccines)—see book by David Kirby, “Evidence of Harm.” Yes, our government doesn’t care if our kids get autism. It doesn’t care if we all get sick taking drugs we don’t need. It certainly doesn’t give a flying f*** about spreading democracy anywhere. We don’t even have it here any more!

I don’t even think much blame is to be laid on Israel and the Likudniks - in contrast to what many of you may think. I think instead, that it’s a cover for a “Grand Chessboard” takeover of the oil/gas interests in the middle east, of which Israel may benefit, but let’s face it, Israel ultimately will be hurt (and antisemitism spread) if it continues to behave in such a bellicose manner. So it is not behaving in its own best interests, but likely in the interests of some behind-the-scenes corporate players.

Check out this site—created by the rethinking aids society:

http://rethinkingaids.com/

Notice that there is an interview today with Peter Duesberg!

Also, you can see on that page a link to the 2600 AIDS “Rethinkers”—scientists and others who doubt the HIV-AIDS link:

http://www.rethinkingaids.com/quotes/rethinkers.htm


Nope, I’m not in the health field. I became a mom.

Best,
Kellina

Report this
Purple Girl's avatar

By Purple Girl, August 3, 2008 at 6:10 am Link to this comment

I am Outraged when I hear the Praises of Ronny- when on so many issues Reagans’ admin was the beginning of the End - Of national Security, Our Unions, Our healthcare syetem, Banking and Financing ethics….And GRID/Aids/HIV. Reagan and his admin IGNORED the Epidemic while it grew in the Gay Community, continued to IGNORE it when it hit the Black Community, But finally gave it a sideward glance when Paul Michael Glasses wife (white)& 8yr old (?) Alan White( White) contracted it and the national Blood supply.
What is worse Creating Frankenstein or Releasing him on the ‘Village’???
So now with the Confirmation that the Anthrax ‘Attacks’ origniated in our Own Military Base…Why is it so far fetched to think AIDS was not also- When did that enter the Military Bases Storage Units..How long before We began to see cases, was this Stored at some Domestic facility? so was Rev Wright Wrong to consider the possiblity that AIDS was a previously possessed Biological weapon before the First Outbreak? The answer as to HOW Patient X was exposed still has not been adequately determined.
At the very least, Those who were above Ivnes are guilty of Reckless endangerment of All the Citizens of this country- Murder 2?keeping this ‘unstable ’ employee was bad enough, but to continue to give him access to deadly agents Too? Then how exactly did the chain of control (storage logs & inventory control) Fail to catch this ‘shortage’, is there not a ‘sign out ’ documentation sheet?Who knew what he was working with- what was his reason for having this in the lab? What kind of containment do they have so such ‘accidents’ don’t happen?
This Base and all those who are knowledge of the ‘lack’ of safety controls on this type of Weapon- should be held Personally responsible for the deaths and the illness (Murder & Attempted Murder) caused by their lack of ability to handle & control such Agents
I am not interested in Congress having hearings on Protocol- the scientific community already has guidleline- so no smoke and Mirrors charade. the case against those who are in the position to provide oversight or commands have proven their liablous actions and inactions, if not some Complicity indicated by their action & Inactions.
Thus if it is found that the AIDS virus was in the possession of the US gov’t/military prior to the firstknow case- would it not be possible to conclude that due to Reagans Admins/Military Actions and Inactions they too were suspect in ‘Frankenstein ’ being released- intentinal or Unintentionally??

Report this

By samosamo, August 2, 2008 at 11:44 pm Link to this comment

By Kellina, August 2 at 3:55 pm #

You’re back for now!
I have to admit to an ignorance of HIV & AIDS and as others on this site know I appreciate upgrading my ignorance so I can either discuss in an intelligent manner or keep my mouth shut. I just know that AIDS, which I thought was in direct correlation to HIV, has killed a lot of people and the shameful way that the reagan admin handled it until the people demanded attention to it still allowed a lot of people to die. Another part of it was that it was supposedly being passed through sex and not just between gays but heterosexuals. That is scary to me. But I still don’t put it past our current government to have an underhanded scheme ongoing just by the news(if it is true)of a 40% descrepency in the number of cases. Don’t forget the Tuskegee, Alabama syphilis infection tests done to the black people during the early 1900s.
I mean if someone came here from Africa infected with multi-resistant TB there would be some serious attention going into that, the cdc would be all over it. So a proper question would probably be why have the infection rates drastically changed and no program of sorts to be testing in the field? Could it be that HIV or AIDS, and being a long term developing disease and people not realizing they are infected, that the rate of detection is hampered?
Here in my state,town a year or so ago, billboards were put up to alert people to a syphilis outbreak.
This does not add up for me and maybe I ought to not speak out until I learn all the why fors and why nots.
And by the way, are you working in the health field?

Report this

By cyrena, August 2, 2008 at 9:59 pm Link to this comment

Kath and Kellina,

Thanks so very much for this input and information on HIV/AIDS.

Intentionally or otherwise, this is something very difficult for the average layperson to be up to speed on. (Intentional sounds really possible, as noted by Kellina in the standard procedure to rush through expensive drugs that not only don’t work, but actually worsen the condition).

Thanks again.

Report this

By Kellina, August 2, 2008 at 4:56 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Incidentally, you may ask, “what about Africa?” AIDS statistics differ dramatically in US/Western Europe vs. Africa. In Africa, the ratio of male to female AIDS cases is evenly split, 50-50, with no risk groups. Also, in Africa 90% of the cases of AIDS are microbial in nature, versus 62% in the US. AIDS is said to have originated in Tanzania, Africa, yet their rates of AIDS are much lower than in the US, which doesn’t make sense from an infectious disease model perspective. Comparisons of HIV infection rates show that, as of 1996, Africa had 14 million HIV positive people, whereas the US had 1 million. Yet rates of AIDS are nearly identical, and people in the US develop AIDS at a rate that is 10-20 times faster than in Africa. Why would the AIDS epidemic behave differently in one country than another? Certainly the use of hard drugs differs dramatically between the US/Western Europe and Africa. African AIDS appear caused by malnutrition, parasitic infections, and poor sanitation.

Additionally, due to the high cost of HIV tests in Africa, the tests are not generally used, and “AIDS” is defined (by World Health Organization standards) if three of the following symptoms are observed: weight loss of greater than 10% in the last two months, fever, diarrhea, persistent cough, itchy rash. These symptoms also correspond to local diseases—such as tuberculosis and malaria—that are a common result of poor nutrition, poor sanitation, and unsafe drinking water. Therefore, these diseases often mistaken for AIDS dramatically raise the number of individuals infected in Africa.  Paradoxically, Africans are dying in no greater numbers than they ever were since the outbreak of “AIDS” in Africa.

Report this

By Kellina, August 2, 2008 at 4:55 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Hi Samosamo,
It may be a conspiracy—but not in the way that you think.

HIV is harmless, does not lead to AIDS, and is not even sexually transmitted. It takes about 1,000 sexual encounters with an HIV+ person before HIV is transmitted. Sexually transmitted diseases usually are passed along at the rate of 1 in 2 contacts. If HIV were sexually transmitted, one would soon see equal distribution of infection across men and women, but we don’t, except in Africa (more later).

HIV doesn’t even kill the few t-cells it infects! The HI virus (HIV virus being redundant) fails Koch’s postulates - rules for demonstrated that a microbe causes a disease. HIV is a retrovirus that is transmitted usually perinatally from mother to child. It also appears very often once someone already has a damaged immune system, so it’s called a “passenger virus.”

So what causes that damaged immune system, and therefore, AIDS, you ask? Well, look carefully at the main risk groups (in the US and Western Europe): gay men and drug users. Actually, it’s only drug users, some of whom happen to be gay men. Prostitutes who don’t use drugs are virtually unknown in the AIDS risk groups. Hard drugs, like cocaine, heroine, meth, and amyl nitrate inhalants (poppers), are major correlates. The type of drug produces AIDS diseases specific to the drug used (e.g., cocaine and pneumonia, poppers and kaposi’s sarcoma).

An unfortunate second kind of drug causes aids—and that’s a set of prescription drugs called “dna-chain terminators,” of which AZT is the most recognizable. These are drugs deemed unsafe for treating cancer - because they kill all cells - but were hurriedly rushed through FDA confirmation (the fastest in history). Other supposed AIDS drugs, like protease inhibitors fail to stop AIDS because all they do is immobilize HIV, which isn’t causing the AIDS.

So you go to your doc, get the HIV test (notoriously unreliable), they start you on AIDS drugs, and you gradually sicken… and die (if you were treated in the early 90s). Drug companies want as many people as possible diagnosed with chronic but incurable diseases, so that they think they require daily drugs, very expensive ones at that.

And did you know that a significant number of people have AIDS but are HIV- and also many folks are HIV+ but never go on (decades) to develop AIDS? Left “untreated” by modern pharmaceuticals, people are just fine with seropositive status.

It’s all there in Peter Duesberg’s book, “Inventing the AIDS virus.” See also a documentary film produced in 1996 (‘HIV=AIDS: fact or fraud’).

Kellina

Report this

By samosamo, August 2, 2008 at 3:46 pm Link to this comment

I don’t know about the rest of you, but, this doesn’t imply any kind of agenda to infect a major segment of our country with HIV thus aids, IT GODDAMN IS AS EXPLICIT AS IT GETS. And what a great weapon to use in a war against people that the invaders want to annilate. How long after infection before someone just feels so crappy that they go to the doctor to find they have developed full blown aids and here is your pain killers and good luck?
Any other disease would be and is tracked very close by the cdc but this just seems to have fallen through the wood work so to speak. Irreprehensible! Same as being told the wtc towers collapsed due to impact and the jet fuel melting the metal 4” thick steel core, never mind the demolition explosions coming all the way down the building in plain sight for all to see with no steel core of either building left, all cut to pieces by demolition.
Here’s a chance to start investigations and prosecutions of a lot of criminally and treasonous minded people and no doubt enough evidence to successfully prosecute.
If these wicked people are this intent on their mischief, all I can say is girls, make sure he is wearing at least 2 condoms and guys, don’t ask, wear at least 2 condoms. Thing is, unless you get checked by the doctor, you don’t know.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.