LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 21, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Rise Up or Die

Revenge of the Bear: Russia Strikes Back in Syria

Tumblr Is Worth $1.1 Billion to Yahoo for One Reason: You

Real American Boy: How Our Byzantine Immigration System and Failed Economy May Have Made a Terrorist

DOJ Allegedly Spied on Fox News Correspondent, the FBI Investigates Bachmann, and More

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Lock Up Washington
 * NEW! * Too Soon to Tell: The Case for Hope, Continued
 * NEW! * Warming Climate Endangers U.K. Farming

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Occupation Negotiations Hit Snags

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jul 13, 2008

President Bush had hoped to shape America’s military presence in Iraq for years after his departure from the White House by negotiating a long-term status-of-forces agreement, but a number of sticking points indicate there will be a much shorter time frame. U.S. negotiators have agreed to a kind of timetable for withdrawal, as demanded by the Iraqis, but are holding out over legal immunity for American forces.

The chief argument for staying in Iraq is that the country will fall apart if the U.S. withdraws, so it’s instructive that Iraqis themselves seem to look forward to that day. One U.S. official told The Washington Post that Iraqi politicians were adamant that some kind of withdrawal timetable be included. Otherwise they would not be able to sell the agreement to the people. Imagine that.


Washington Post:

The failure of months of negotiations over the more detailed accord—blamed on both the Iraqi refusal to accept U.S. terms and the complexity of the task—deals a blow to the Bush administration’s plans to leave in place a formal military architecture in Iraq that could last for years.

Although President Bush has repeatedly rejected calls for a troop withdrawal timeline, “we are talking about dates,” acknowledged one U.S. official close to the negotiations. Iraqi political leaders “are all telling us the same thing. They need something like this in there. ... Iraqis want to know that foreign troops are not going to be here forever.”

Unlike the status-of-forces agreements between the United States and countries such as South Korea and Japan, where large numbers of U.S. troops have been based for decades, the document now under discussion with Iraq is likely to cover only 2009. Negotiators expect it to include a “time horizon,” with specific goals for U.S. troop withdrawal from Baghdad and other cities and installations such as the former Saddam Hussein palace that now houses the U.S. Embassy.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, July 16, 2008 at 2:52 am Link to this comment

re: samosamo, July 14 at 4:45 pm #

Kind of hard on the crimminals aren’t you?

Report this

By purplewolf, July 15, 2008 at 9:28 pm Link to this comment

Didn’t Bush says in the past few weeks that if the Iraqi asked us to leave that we would? Well I do believe I heard that this past week, so how about it Bush, when do we get to come home, all of our people. Let the contractors get out or fend for themselves. And it’s time to cut the apron strings away from Israel too.

Report this

By samosamo, July 14, 2008 at 5:45 pm Link to this comment

PatrickHenry, July 14 at 4:02 pm #

I hope w’s time is short but delusional? I do see evidence of a person with retarded thinking but w is criminal. And to be a criminal has to include intelligence of some degree, especially to get away with it. If this election comes off and w steps down hopefully someone with better concern, respect and intelligence(especially on how to use his advisors) then yeah, Iraq and Afghanistan should come to a halt.
But w has done what he was put in office 2 different and controversial if not out right fraudlent times, to do. That is do what the industrial military complex, oil companies, and the arms and munitions industries wanted him to do. And it was done with the think tank planning, plotting, and schemming of the neocons from as least slick dick nix’s presidency.
But also, hoping that if everything turns democrat will be for changes and accountability, all I will say is remember the 2006 elections. There may not have been any veto override power but those new dems in the house and senate toed the line for our corporate president and they could have denied funding. So don’t hold your breath, but hope it does happen.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, July 14, 2008 at 5:02 pm Link to this comment

Bush is delusional.  His gig in Iraq and Afghanistan is about to come to a close. 

His time is short and soon he will not be able to offer the “big umbrella” of presidential pardons, patronage and protection he offers and enjoys.  In fact, if a democratic administration gets in office and Republican seats in the House and Senate are lost, committees and investigations will begin with many new democratic congressmen and senators.

Now until Jan 20 are Americas most dangerous days.

Report this

By samosamo, July 14, 2008 at 7:57 am Link to this comment

cyrena, July 14 at 2:21 am #

Well, the thing is, our good ole USofA has been kicked out of countries where the people got tired our presence/occupation there. The phillippines come to mind right off so it is not impossible to kick our sorry asses out of a country, military bases and all, it may just take a change of government in that country or just a massive uprising of the people or as simple as a new leader being elected. Also the Saudis kicked our military out because I think it was starting to have a detrimental effect on the fundamentalist muslims which is still a cause of concern to the present house of saud being overthrown. Of course we have a presence back in the phillippines due to the scare tactic of ‘helping’ to fight the war on terror. And history has many instances where the hegemenic forces were forced out and to the betterment of that country.
I am rereading Chalmers Johnson’s 3 book trilogy and for me it helps to reenforce what I thought was said and how I interpreted it or corrected something I just read over and never understood. His references from Mike Davis’ book ‘The Late Victorian Holocausts’ which I am almost finished reading, brings this to mind that a country can tire of being occupied and through some changes or just telling the imperialist to get out, they leave. This book is really interesting and descriptive, horribly so, but also gives a very good look at the workings of the El Nino weather system which is something that should NOT be brushed off in this imperialist world, it is worth the read.

Report this

By hippy pam, July 14, 2008 at 7:07 am Link to this comment

I think “BULLSH*T” has a LOT OF NERVE trying to set POLICY for the NEXT ADMINISTRATION.He needs to SHUT UP AND GO LAY DOWN.And he should face charges in a COURT of LAW for WAR CRIMES-LOOTING THE AMERICAN TREASURY-MURDER-GENOCIDE-PERJURY-EXTORTION-hey all you out there…PLEASE…FEEL FREE TO ADD ON TO THIS LIST…

Report this

By cyrena, July 14, 2008 at 3:21 am Link to this comment

I’m with ya Samosamo. It feels like a bit of a deja vu for me, because I said myself, (so many times that people where quite willing to tell me to just shut up) that the US wasn’t going to get out of Iraq EVER, under any circumstances other than the Iraqis kicking us out.

I didn’t know how they would do it, because of the very intentional destruction of what army and security forces they had, (on day one of the invasion). THAT was the absolute DUMBEST thing they could have done, besides being there in the first place. Had they NOT destroyed the Iraq security forces already in place, they wouldn’t have had this mess.

BUT…since Dick et al knew all along that we would be seen as the invaders and occupiers that we were, their first step was to completely destroy Iraq’s army and local security forces, to make sure that they didn’t have any resistance.

Guess they got fooled again. Imperial Arrogance will do it every time. It’s amazing. If it was ANY OTHER country besides the US doing this, the entire world would have been on them like White on Rice. (no pun actually intended there).

But, here’s my favorite part…

“...Negotiators expect it to include a “time horizon,” with specific goals for U.S. troop withdrawal from Baghdad and other cities and installations such as the former Saddam Hussein palace that now houses the U.S. Embassy.”

And such installations that now house the U.S. Embassy! Hot damn! There’s that billion dollars they’ll have to just kiss goodbye. Let the Iraqis use it for an orphanage, or a school, or whatever else they need it for. We’ve destroyed all of the stuff they had, in what had been for centuries and centuries, the Birthplace of Civilization.

If the US can give what has become 5.5 BILLION a year to little tiny Israel, (and that simply MUST stop) then we’ll just have to walk about from the US Capitol of the Middle East in Baghdad.

And, they better step fast too.

Meantime, Cheney still won. He finally forced those oil contracts. Maybe even THAT could change. Iraq needs to sell their oil, but they need to sell it at a fair price. The stuff Dick et al has been trying to shove down their throats for 6 years has been one of the most exploitive “Profit Sharing Arrangements” ever to be written in the history of the universe.

Report this

By samosamo, July 13, 2008 at 8:26 pm Link to this comment

Looks like the Iraqi government has been paying attention to the status-of-forces agreements with other countries and been told NOT to sign one by these countries. Could this be just another bit of light shinning through the ole chink in the black armor of our illigetimate administration? If it is then it could be the rest of the world starting to gang up on the US to stop our insane government and military or slow it down.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.