![]() |
![]() |
||
|
Daniel Ellsberg’s Guide to FISAPosted on Jul 7, 2008
What’s the big deal about the new FISA “compromise”? Simply put, it legitimizes warrantless spying on Americans while papering over one of George W. Bush’s worst abuses. Daniel Ellsberg would like your help in stopping it, provided you can set aside 60 seconds of your Monday.
Advertisement Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By Outraged, July 8, 2008 at 3:02 pm #
I posted this on the other thread, but it applies here as well:
Regarding FISA, Sen Russ Feingold addressing the senate:
So Congress devised a system that would take the guesswork out of it completely. Under that system, which is still in place today, the companies legal obligations and liability depend entirely on whether the government has presented the company with a court order or a certification stating that certain basic requirements have been met. If the proper documentation is submitted, the company must cooperate with the request and is immune from liability. If the proper documentation has not been submitted, the company must refuse the governments request, or be subject to possible liability in the courts.
This framework, which has been in place for 30 years, protects companies that comply with legitimate government requests while also protecting the privacy of Americans communications from illegitimate snooping.
Granting companies that allegedly cooperated with an illegal program the new form of retroactive immunity that is in this bill undermines the law that has been on the books for decades a law that was designed to prevent exactly the type of abuses that allegedly occurred here.
Even worse, granting retroactive immunity under these circumstances will undermine any new laws that we pass regarding government surveillance. If we want companies to follow the law in the future, it sends a terrible message, and sets a terrible precedent, to give them a get out of jail free card for allegedly ignoring the law in the past….
....“On top of all this, we are considering granting immunity when roughly 70 members of the Senate still have not been briefed on the Presidents wiretapping program. The vast majority of this body still does not even know what we are being asked to grant immunity for….
At the rawstory site w/video;
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/As_FISA_heads_toward_vot e_Feingold_0708.html
Thank you Sen Feingold, Dodd and Leahy.
Report thisBy samosamo, July 7, 2008 at 8:43 pm #
I hope my republican senators don’t use the FISA or Patriot Act to label me a terrorist or pick me up and cart me away.
Report this