Mark Penn is obviously directing the attention to Clinton’s campaign instead of his own misdeeds abroad. Of course he had a comment about “the campaign” but I’m curious as to his perspective of the practice of selling the souls of the citizenry of a foreign country to soften the cushion upon which his traitorous backside resides.

Leefeller is on right track.It was her positions that did her in.The vote on the War,the vote for the Bankruptcy bill,the vote to label a part of Itran’s armed forces a terrorist group and on and on.Hillary lost it by running a general campaign before she had the democratic nomination.Hillary it was you who lost it.By the way if she were a man she would have had no chance at the democratic nomination Ms Ferraro.

Apparently Iowans aren’t that fond of doughnuts. The Clinton campaign spent $46,000 in Iowa on the lethal little suckers - and to no avail obviously.  Pundits suggest that the Iowa campaign was a harbinger of things to come, only the first in a series of bad moves, wrong-headedness, flawed policies and just in general screw-ups.

Leefeller:

“It couldn’t have been the war stupid!  Everyone was impressed with the kitchen sink and the guest room toilet and how about the gathering of bigots?”

~~~

Oh well said!

How dumb does dumb have to be before dumb understands dumb?

Don’t know, and I’ll bet Hillary and company haven’t figured it out yet either. But in case they actually want to try, here’s a clue:

WAR

HRC failed to achieve her goal because she surrounded herself in an envelope of experience when she should have put on the mantle of change as had BHO.  It was that simple.  It is and was pretty well known in political circles that any Democrat is a shoe-in for the presidency.  With the economy tanking and gas prices nearing $5/gal by November, a regime change is in order!

It couldn’t have been the war stupid!  Everyone was impressed with the kitchen sink and the guest room toilet and how about the gathering of bigots?

So if you had $100M in 2007 and were already short of cash by early (very early) 2008 what does that say?

I think that it says you’re an idiot, especially if you blew a fair percentage of that $100M on hiring idiots like Mark Penn.  You know, the type of guy who says that you don’t really need an organization in those smaller caucus states because they don’t really matter…and the money spent there could be better spent on his salary.

campaigns are equally about money and organization...and we wasted our money and didn’t have any organization.  But don’t look at me, i would only have been in charge if we won.