LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 21, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Rise Up or Die

Revenge of the Bear: Russia Strikes Back in Syria

Real American Boy: How Our Byzantine Immigration System and Failed Economy May Have Made a Terrorist

Tumblr Is Worth $1.1 Billion to Yahoo for One Reason: You

It's News, Not Espionage

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Too Soon to Tell: The Case for Hope, Continued
 * NEW! * Warming Climate Endangers U.K. Farming

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
The Making of Global Capitalism

The Making of Global Capitalism

By Sam Gindin and Leo Panitch
$29.95

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Court Sides With Polygamists

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on May 22, 2008

Government agents had no legal right to seize hundreds of children from a Mormon fundamentalist compound in Texas, an appeals court has ruled. The government argued that the children were suffering abuse, but the court decided the children had been in no immediate danger.


BBC:

The court said that the reasons given for the children’s removal were “legally and factually insufficient”.

But it did not immediately order the return of the children to the ranch.

In April, officials raided a compound of the sect, saying young girls were being forced into marriage and sex. The children were placed into foster care.

But the Texas Third Appeal Court ruled that officials failed to demonstrate the children were in any immediate danger, which is the only legally allowable reason for taking children from their homes without court proceedings.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Conservative Yankee, May 23, 2008 at 6:27 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Actually your distaste or resentment should be placed where it belongs. Far from resting on “technicalities” the judge said:

The Texas CPS failed to present any evidence to indicate children were in jeopardy. This does not mean they were safe, it simply means that the TEXAS CPS used opinion rather than facts to remove children. 

Before you go out on your pure white horse, you might wish to find out how the majority of children in Texas’ foster care fare!

http://www.ahrp.org/infomail/04/11/13.php
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/texassouthwest/stories/032307dntexcps.3e702e7.html
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/region/legislature/stories/05/07/7foster.html

Need more, I’ll be happy to provide further links!

Report this

By kath cantarella, May 22, 2008 at 6:33 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

His name should be in this article. Name and shame.

The third appeal court? Does this mean that the case passed two lower courts before being overturned (on this technicality) or what? 

The trouble with some judges is that they believe they are there to preserve the legal technicalities of the law, instead of upholding the spirit of the law through wise interpretation. The trouble with other judges is that, for various reasons, they are not impartial.

Report this

By kath cantarella, May 22, 2008 at 6:04 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

‘no immediate danger’ is a legal technicality. If i am bigoted towards certain religionists, it’s self-defence. They were bigotted towards my kind first, or i wouldn’t have a problem with them, believe me.

Report this

By Regan Republican, May 22, 2008 at 3:33 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

These people were a part of a cult.  The danger was, which I was surprised wasn’t taken into consideration, that they wanted to separate the polygamists from their children before they are brainwashed on the situation and the case completely lost.  The womanizing is unacceptable and like their brother cults such as Scientology, they have a strong legal team that is going to be hard to overcome (and the state department knows that).  I wish we could have Texas justice in New York!

Report this

By MDC, May 22, 2008 at 2:58 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Everything Texas CPS alleged about this group has turned out to have been hyperbolic.  I am so glad someone in Texas was willing to take a logical look at this sorry episode.  I hope the families get just compensation for this outrage.  I also hope all the zealots involved in this are punished harshly; the Judge, the CPS workers, the false accuser and the bitter ex-FLDS members.

These parents had their children seized simply because they were a member of a religious minority; textbook religious discrimination.

Report this

By Conservative Yankee, May 22, 2008 at 2:32 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The court rules there was no justification for removal of the children, BUT fails to order them restored to their parents..

Texas justice, Gotta love it!

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.