LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.   Exclusive Truthdig Gifts! Mr. Fish Signed Prints and T-shirts - Gore Vidal Signed First Editions
December 1, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Addicted to Nonsense

Michael Moore to Obama: 'Say It Isn't So'

Goodman on Goodman

Do the 'Brad Pitt Houses' Help New Orleans?

Lab-Grown Pig Even Vegetarians Can Eat

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * The Copenhagen Conundrum
 * NEW! * Addicted to Nonsense

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Factory Girls

Factory Girls

By Leslie T. Chang
$17.16

Appetite for Self-Destruction

Appetite for Self-Destruction

By Steve Knopper
$19.76

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Another Reason Not to Vote for McCain

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on May 6, 2008
supreme court justices
Supreme Court / Steve Petteway

The Democrats have been worried about unifying their party, so it’s odd that John McCain would pick this moment to give them another reason to band together. If elected, McCain said Tuesday, he would think of conservative Justices John Roberts and Samuel Alito “as the model for my own nominees” to the Supreme Court.


Washington Post:

WINSTON-SALEM, N.C., May 6—Highlighting an issue he plans to use aggressively in the general election campaign, Sen. John McCain on Tuesday decried “the common and systematic abuse of our federal courts by the people we entrust with judicial power” and pledged to nominate judges similar to the ones President Bush has placed on the bench.

The presumptive Republican presidential nominee said that Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. “would serve as the model for my own nominees, if that responsibility falls to me,” highlighting the gap between Republicans and Democrats on the question of who should sit on the Supreme Court. Both justices have established strong conservative records since Bush appointed them, and the appointment of one more conservative to the nation’s highest court could tip the balance on issues such as abortion, discrimination, civil liberties and private property.

The two remaining Democratic candidates, Sens. Barack Obama (Ill.) and Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.), opposed the nominations of Roberts and Alito.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By wildflower, May 8, 2008 at 1:00 am #

Kathryn Kolbert, president of People for the American Way is certainly on target.  McCain is peddling the same old deal to the Republican base - and what a deal it is for the Republican Party.  If McCain were elected they would get not only their favorite supreme court nominee, but a perpetual war in Iraq, additional trillions in debt, and maybe even a nuclear McArmageddon.

Report this

By samosamo, May 7, 2008 at 8:00 pm #

How can anyone trust the supreme court? I mean, don’t the remaining 4 criminals that stopped the florida vote recount belong behind bars right now? Since congress is another miserable failure for the people, what can the citizentry do to have those criminals taken off the bench? Of course, timing is everything right now. I would at least wait until December 31, 2008 so little w couldn’t get any other of his cronies placed in the court. The problem then is to find replacements that will not have been bought out by corporate america.
Hang em all. They have the neocon agenda and have absolutely NO consideration for the people of this country except to grind us into the ground.

Report this

By Aegrus, May 7, 2008 at 5:15 pm #

Wrong, we have turncoat dems in the Senate. We need to get better representation into the Senate and House of Representatives before we even begin to discuss numbers and filibusters. We could use some old school fiscal conservatives too to balance the damn budget and properly stimulate the economy.

Report this

By voice of truth, May 7, 2008 at 3:54 pm #

With Dems in control of the Senate, no Republican could nominate a judge deemed to be too conservative.  This whole article is alarmist for no reason.

Report this

By Purple Girl, May 7, 2008 at 10:20 am #

No other group of ‘Scotus’ memebers have proven their Political motivations in Rulings then this group of hacks.
The most recent proof was the timing of the Indiana Photo ID BS ruling- One Week before the Primary. How much mor eobvious was tha tbit of Rigging.
6 out of 9 need to not ony be thrown off any ‘bench’ ,b ut should be investigated and prosectued for Derelcition of Duty- did they not take an Oathe to protect & uphold the constitution so as to best serve the people. All they had to do was suspend the requirement until after the primary to not appear to be trying to surpress voters, but they did not- Ruled with malice and Intent to place undue influence on election Results (again)

Report this

By Aegrus, May 7, 2008 at 9:05 am #

Johnny Boy is just pandering to the social conservatives. He’s a shell of his former self, and anyone who knows a damn thing has been aware there is one reason over all not to vote Republican this election. The Supreme Court.

No matter what your justification, a four year election cycle is not as bad as having lifetime-appointed law masters who favor hardcore social conservative values. It’s wrong, and you’ll be condemning America for decades with a vote for John McCain.

Report this

By G.Anderson, May 7, 2008 at 12:50 am #

One of the many ways that our country is different than say a country like Iran, is that at least some of our leadership attempts to live in a modern world.

We don’t stone people to death, or allow male relatives to kill their daughters in rites of honor. Punishments that are more fitting to the middle ages than the world we now live in.

Apparently the Neo cons would like to change all that. Aside from Justice Scalia’s statements to the effect that group sex is a healthy way to let off steam, it appears that the suprememe court under a McCain presidency would be doing it’s best to travel back in time to a place where the law and human rights, especially here in the USA, were much different.

The question would only be which century? The 18th, the 17th, the 15th? Take your pick.

And maybe that is just why the Neo Con’s have such an obesession with Iran. Maybe, just maybe, in their hearts they are little bit envious of the punishments that the Iranians are able to dish out, and would like to be able to use them to keep the underclass in line. After all fear can only go so far.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.