LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 19, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Krugman to Playboy: Economic Crisis 'Doesn't Have to Be Happening'

Déjà Pooh

The .0000063% Election

Truthdigger of the Week: Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis

The Best, Most Revealing Reporting on the Foreclosure Crisis

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * The Lowdown on Fracking
 * NEW! * The .0000063% Election

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Déjà Pooh

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
The Arabs: A History

The Arabs: A History

By Eugene Rogan
$23.10

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

U.S. Releases Journalist After 6 Years

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on May 2, 2008
Sami Al-Haj
mcclatchydc.com

Sudanese-born journalist Sami al-Haj, in U.S. custody for seven years, was never charged with any crime.

Sami Al-Haj, a cameraman for Al-Jazeera, was released Thursday evening after spending almost seven years in U.S. custody, six of those as an inmate at Guantanamo Bay. Al-Haj was never charged with any crime, nor was any evidence against him ever revealed.


The Guardian:

An al-Jazeera cameraman detained by American forces in Afghanistan was last night released after spending nearly six years imprisoned without charge at Guantánamo Bay.

Sami al-Haj, 39, was arrested on the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan on December 15 2001, while on assignment to cover the war against the Taliban. Although he had a valid visa to work in Afghanistan, US intelligence alleged that he was an al-Qaida operative, and he was transferred to Guantánamo in June 2002.

Last night, his lawyer, Clive Stafford Smith, said Haj was en route to his home in Sudan to be reunited with his wife and son. He said: “I’m very glad Sami has finally been released, but the question is why he wasn’t freed many years ago.”

The US military alleged that Haj had secretly interviewed Osama bin Laden, smuggled guns for al-Qaida and worked as a financial courier for Chechen rebels. But the evidence against him was never revealed, and he was never charged.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By nefertiti, May 5, 2008 at 1:23 am Link to this comment

Im surprised the release of Sami AL Haj is not covered by CNN , Skynews , ITV or BBC . why isnt it a Journalist worthy of a coverage , even short one? if he was called Johnson or another name and was in an Arab jail we would definitely hear about his ordeal and the injustice and how his rights were abused . shame on the so called Honest Neutral Media , now it has been exposed !

Report this

By Jim C, May 4, 2008 at 3:01 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

You all may have noticed that this isn’t being covered anywhere . If you didn’t read it here you probably wouldn’t know it happened . What is truly maddening is that neither the congress or the senate is doing anything . One has to wonder just what it would take to get some action ? This is by far the most dispicable and criminal administration in history and our representives sit on their hands . It appears that the inattention is either because of political cowardace or because of some pathetic political gamesmanship , either , or , its disgusting . We desperatly need new leadership, Pelosi and Reid need to be removed from their posts , they are both absolutely worthless . I have seen Reid popping up on various programs , he’s promoting his book . It’s apparently about how tough and what a fighter he is , yeah right .

Report this

By Douglas Chalmers, May 4, 2008 at 11:01 am Link to this comment

Oh, I hope that your next “computer crash” is fatal, cyrena….... Geeze, your stuff gives me a headache, uhh.

Report this

By Douglas Chalmers, May 4, 2008 at 10:55 am Link to this comment

Well, Al Jazeera has turned out to be one of the very best media organizations on the planet (that’s not hard these days). And they have extensive on-the-ground coverage throughout Asia (from Turkey to Taiwan). What is more, they understand what they report on in a way that Westerners can’t.

So, perhaps the entire Guantanamo ‘exercise’ was about intimidating such interests outside of the USA? After all, if you are reporting on a story and know that you can at any moment find yourself bound and gagged on a CIA “black flight” to an unknown country, you are supposed to be mindful of what you say.

Note that the Bush administration didn’t particularly care, either, that their “renditioning” came to light as well as the things that happen on a military base located offensively in someone else’s country. The fact that Guanatanamo is in Cuba should explain something in itself, uhh.

But you have missed the point, Ernesto, if you think that BushCo is “...a movement that does not accept the legitimacy of the established order…”. It is merely an update on the established order that you all blindly accepted being deceived by all of your life.

What you all fail to understand is that this is something that has been worked up to diligently since 1945. Not that it didn’t have its roots a century earlier but it has been continuous since then. You are all as helpless as the prisoners in Guantanamo yourselves!

Report this

By Douglas Chalmers, May 4, 2008 at 10:39 am Link to this comment

The Grapes of Wrath was about arriving in California as much as it was about leaving the dustbowl of bank foreclosures…....

Being met with repression and prejudice is no different then than it is today and was when African were brought in chains to America and other “settler societies”.

Report this

By cann4ing, May 4, 2008 at 6:11 am Link to this comment

Fear engendered by an endless “war on terror” against a phantom menace who is everywhere and anywhere at all times is but one of the tools these counter-revolutionaries use to gain and maintain power.  At a critical juncture in Orwell’s “1984,” inside the Ministry of Love, O’Brien, the burly inner-Party member, halts his physical torture of the protagonist Winston Smith (electric shock)in order to assault him with a fundamental truth about the Party.  “The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake.  We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power.  Not wealth or luxury or long life or happiness; only power, pure power.”

Report this

By Expat, May 4, 2008 at 3:57 am Link to this comment

^ it is about fear.  This combines all of the elements of Kafka, Orwell, and Fahrenheit 451.  I understand “how” this was pulled off, but, what I don’t understand is how it is; that this is still being “pulled off”.  Why is it the American people don’t see through this; and, they are still running scared?

Report this

By kevin99999, May 3, 2008 at 9:52 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Does this act represent the true face of America…beyond all the deceptive rhetoric?

Report this

By cyrena, May 3, 2008 at 4:35 pm Link to this comment

Ernest, you are my hero of the day. You just saved me a whole bunch of work in retracing resources that I lost to a fatal computer crash serveral weeks ago.

And, I DESPERATELY NEEDED this info to complete some overdue work.

This that you’ve quoted from Krugman is enormously helpful, because it helps to explain, (when considered in conjunction with other references) what has been so difficult for me to digest as a theoretical concept. (I’ve struggled with Carl Schmitt as well, though I think I’m finally getting that weaved in).

•  “In “The Great Unraveling” Paul Krugman described the Bush/Cheney regime and the hard right movement that put them in office as a “revolutionary power”—that is a movement that does not accept the legitimacy of the established order.  “When you’re dealing with a revolutionary power, it’s important to realize that it knows what it wants, and will make whatever argument advances that goal. So there should be no presumption that the claims it makes on behalf of its actions make any sense in their own terms.”

“So there should be no presumption that the claims it makes on behalf of its action MAKE ANY SENSE IN THEIR OWN TERMS.”

That says it. But I’ll tell you what, this has been the HEAVIEST of “intellectual lifting” I think I’ve ever needed to contemplate, and it ain’t been easy. That’s because there’s no way to make the irrational, rational. Needless to say, it’s because it isn’t INTENDED to. The additional consequences of this revolutionary movement (and lack of logic for actions) also creates and maintains the chaotic and unstable environment that is REQUIRED of any revolutionary movement. None of it would ‘work’ (for the movement) without this chaos and instability, and the terror is a required component.

Now of course that much I managed to figure out a while back. This ‘War on Terror’ is actually a “war OF terror’ as perpetrated by this ‘revolutionary power’. Guantanamo is just ONE it’s mechanisms.

Meantime, how exactly to explain the gutlessness of the Congress? It’s NOT a ‘partisan’ thing - unless of course that much of the Congress is part of the revolutionary power and we just haven’t figured that out. I don’t know.

Geeze…this stuff gives me a headache.

Thanks again for the resources…

Report this

By cann4ing, May 3, 2008 at 2:53 pm Link to this comment

Jane Mayer, in “The Hidden Power,” an article published two years ago in “The New Yorker” cited a Seton Hall study which revealed that 55% of the detainee population at Guantanamo had never committed a hostile act and only 8% of which were alleged to have been connected to al-Qaeda.  The vast majority, 86%, were captured either by Pakistan or the Northern Alliance at a time when the U.S. was offering huge bounties for “suspected” terrorists.  Per Mayer, both David Addington (Cheney’s chief of staff) and Alberto Gonzales were well aware of this for the JAG & CIA officers sent to Guantanamo to find out why no useful intelligence was being extracted returned, reporting to Addington & Gonzales, that “more than half the detainees…didn’t belong there.”  Their pleas were callously ignored.  A perplexed administration official questioned the logic:  “How could you deny the possibility that one or more people were locked up who shouldn’t be there?  There were old people, sick people—why do we want to keep them?”

In “The Great Unraveling” Paul Krugman described the Bush/Cheney regime and the hard right movement that put them in office as a “revolutionary power”—that is a movement that does not accept the legitimacy of the established order.  “When you’re dealing with a revolutionary power, it’s important to realize that it knows what it wants, and will make whatever argument advances that goal.  So there should be no presumption that the claims it makes on behalf of its actions make any sense in their own terms.”  The administration official’s questioning of the utility of detaining the innocent made sense only if one assumes that Addington & Gonzales possessed the belief, however misguided, that there was utility in torture in terms of the “professed” goal of fighting a war on terror.

Per the Mayer article:  “‘Torture isn’t important to Addington as a scientific matter, good or bad, or whether it works or not,’ the Administration lawyer, who is familiar with these debates, siad.  ‘It’s more about his philosophy of Presidential power He thinks that if the President wants torture he should get torture.  He always argued for ‘maximum flexibility.’”

Every bill passed by Congress is routed first to Addington who scours them for interference with the exclusive prerogatives of the Unitary Executive.  It is Addington who created the Kafka-like military tribunals and who attached presidential signing statements to more than 800 bills, purporting to reserve to the President the authority to enforce only what he agrees with.

Why did the administration hold Al-Haj all this time without any evidence to justify holding him for as much a one day—a) Because the Administration has been targeting and seeking to silence al Jazeera ever since al Jazeera began broadcasting photos of civilians killed by U.S. bombs in Afghanistan in 2001 and b) because in doing so, it demonstrates that it has the power to do so.  And who’s to say it doesn’t when a gutless Congress not only fails to put impeachment on the table but, in passing the Military Commissions Act of 2006, granted an immunity from war crimes prosecutions for all crimes committed by Bush administration officials in service of the so-called war on terror retroactive to 9/11/01?

Report this

By Tom Doff, May 3, 2008 at 10:27 am Link to this comment

I can’t wait to see/read Sami’s first photo-essay apres-Guantanamo.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, May 3, 2008 at 9:52 am Link to this comment

Locked and Loaded.

Report this

By Don Stivers, May 3, 2008 at 8:39 am Link to this comment

Where in the Hell is our press corps?  Bill Clinton was impeached for lying about a blow job in the back room by a young consenting adult.  A SINGLE crime of lying about an embarrassing incident. 

Aside from all of the lives lost in this war of occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan, this is a case of holding one man against his will without charging him of a crime for 6 years and then releasing him.  That in and of itself is a crime.  The people (note: multiple)who are responsible must, MUST be punished.  And then let’s get on with punishing those same people for the death and destruction of two countries.

Report this

By Expat, May 3, 2008 at 7:39 am Link to this comment

^ so what are you going to do about it?  Pack big (.45) and pack smart!

Report this

By Expat, May 3, 2008 at 7:32 am Link to this comment

^ Sudan.  Nice.  Thanks.

Report this

By Expat, May 3, 2008 at 5:31 am Link to this comment

^ your words Aegrus; “young bison”, in your first post; thats what made me laugh.  I still chuckle on those words.  Get busy!

Report this

By Expat, May 3, 2008 at 5:19 am Link to this comment

I’ve been following this story for a long time on Al Jezeera News.  I feel nausea every time I read an update.  This mans life has probably been destroyed for nothing:  For nothing by Bush and Cheney!!!  Resident Nazi fascists in charge!  I remember a time something like this would have brought an administration down.  My Lai and Tet comes to mind; that was the beginning of the end for us in Viet Nam.  This situation about (Sami Al-Haj) is a fundamental paradigm shift so far to the right as to leave the right on the left.  From my far away view “you” (I’m not there) are sleeping through the theft of everything of any intrinsic value to a free people.  Does anybody see the price being paid for some bozo telling you, you need to “trust” the neo-cons to protect you?  I lived in a very rural area rife with criminal activity; so I carried a gun (sometimes two) because I could not rely on the police (1 officer 500 sq. miles); so I took personal responsibility for my and my families’ safety.  Surely you have seen National Geographic shows showing predator and prey, yes?  The next time you see a show about that watch the behavior of the prey.  Victims always exhibit the same behavior and the American people are exhibiting the same identical behavior.  I’m ashamed to say I’m an American here in Thailand, when I meet other westerners.  Ya’all need to get a grip and get going!  Times flying!  Over and out!

Report this

By Expat, May 3, 2008 at 4:44 am Link to this comment

^ how can he possibly “not” have any “mental” problems?  Did you see pictures of him? He’s aged 30 years.  This is the thing that twists my insides to nausea and furthers my resolve to never set foot on American soil again.  Yes, god damn America!  And yes “young bison”, those were the first words I read on the first post you did on TD.  That made me laugh; a lot; but: Your government is terminally ill and it will never be brought to heel unless you youngsters get some courage and face the bankrupt bastards down!  There may be blood!

Report this

By Expat, May 3, 2008 at 4:34 am Link to this comment

^ Thank you!

Report this

By cyrena, May 3, 2008 at 3:10 am Link to this comment

Aegrus,

I don’t think ANY of these men are returned mentally in-tact, because of the torture. That in itself is reprogramming.

According to the complete article, he was one of the many that went on hunger strikes, (400+ days for him) and so they did the feeding tube thing to him,  and that’s torture.

So, I don’t know. For the few who HAVE been interviewed after the years of captivity and torture, they all seem not so much ‘reprogrammed’ in the old sense of the practice, but just totally whacked out from the torture. KSM wound up ‘confessing’ to every crime under the sun, even though there’s no possible way he could have been in or involved in all those activities at the same time.

Others that they’ve finally charged can’t be tried for the same reasons…all of the stuff they’re charging them for was obtained under torture. How can we ever find out?

This man may certainly be an exception, if he’s ever able to talk, but still. The stuff they’ve done to all of these men is so far beyond the pale that it seems impossible to believe they could ever be ‘right’ again.

Which makes me wonder about John McCain. We’ve been told that he was tortured in captivity, and I have no reason to doubt that. But, I don’t think any of the details of his captivity, or the specific torture methods have ever been revealed. Hard to imagine anyone undergoing the types of torture that have been revealed now, could ever be fully restored to any measure of mental health. 6 years is a very long time.

It makes me so sick just thinking about it.

Report this

By Douglas Chalmers, May 3, 2008 at 1:38 am Link to this comment

Maybe she was going to “beat his brains out”, too…......

Report this

By Douglas Chalmers, May 3, 2008 at 1:24 am Link to this comment

Which is the civilized country - USA or Sudan??? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDFjZ_DHVSc

Report this

By cyrena, May 3, 2008 at 12:12 am Link to this comment

Very appropriate quote here Nancy. WE knew exactly what he was talking about, eh?

The same thing applies to every single story of torture and other crimes against humanity, of which there are now millions notched into the belt that is America.

God should BLESS US? And just exactly what sort of God would do that?

Report this

By cyrena, May 3, 2008 at 12:01 am Link to this comment

KenDen…

You are right to wonder, but I have to tell you, there are so many that we’ll honestly never know. Even among those captured at the same time as this journalist, there were hundreds more that just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Or no, that’s not at all correct. They were NOT in the ‘wrong place’ as they were where they’ve always been. There were hundreds of merchants, sheep herders, farmers, and regular PEOPLE..Afghanis and Pakistanis and others, who were captured at the time, in the ‘sweep’ for ‘terrorists’. Many of them were captured by Pakistanis and ‘sold’ to the US military for bounties. Like I said..regular people.

There have been over 1,000 men ‘processed’ through the torture chambers of Guantanamo. Less than a dozen have actually been charged with anything. I’ve lost count now of the numbers that remain, but keep in mind that George Bush and others of his regime have OFTEN claimed that ‘THERE ARE NO INNOCENT MEN AT GUANTANAMO’. That has ALWAYS been a lie.

For those that have been captured (or rendered) from here and other countries, and taken to secret prisons that the CIA maintains around the world, we’ll never really know the number. We’ve learned of a few, but there are so many that have been ‘disappeared’ that it will take decades to learn of them all, if we ever do.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, May 2, 2008 at 4:59 pm Link to this comment

When facism comes to America it will be draped in a flag carrying a cross” - Sinclair Lewis

That time has come and gone.  To deny citizens of other countries the freedoms which America was founded on, described in the declaration of Independence.

“We hold these truths to be sacred and undeniable, that all men are created equal and independent, that from that equal creation they derive rights inherent and inalienable, among which are the preservation of life, and liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”.

The original Bill of rights was not written exclusively for Americans, but as a moral compass for our government to follow as not to mimic the government of an outside power (England).

How the tables have turned in less than 300 years that our government is now the perpetrator of deeds which envoked the creation of America…..how ironic.

Report this

By david, May 2, 2008 at 4:27 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This begs the question: what would this country say or do if an American citizen were held by, say Germany, for 7 years and then arbitrarily released without any charges being brought against him?

Does it make it ok that the US government committed this atrocious crime?

Maybe Jeremiah Wright was right: you cannot do terrorism onto others and not expect that it be visited on your own people.

Report this

By Michele, May 2, 2008 at 4:09 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Guantanamo Bay - creating just released, new terrorists every day.

Report this

By Don Stivers, May 2, 2008 at 2:18 pm Link to this comment

Ha, ha!!!  Can’t touch Bush or Cheney because the illegal action of holding this man was off shore, off of United States soil so no US laws were broken.

Brilliant, isn’t it? 

What a bunch of pukes we have running our government.  You also Condolizza!

Report this

By KenDen, May 2, 2008 at 1:57 pm Link to this comment

I just wonder how many other innocent people are being held by the fascists running our government.  I still find it hard to believe that they haven’t been impeached.  What does it take to wake Congress up?

Report this

By Nancy Hatfield, May 2, 2008 at 11:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

God Bless America?  No, no, no, no.  Not God Bless America—God damn America!!!!!

Report this

By Aegrus, May 2, 2008 at 10:56 am Link to this comment

Well, it will be very interesting to see if this man is returned mentally in-tact to his family, or completely reprogrammed. I’m very concerned about what this person would have to say about his captivity, or if he can even discuss any of the time he was held at Guantanamo.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.