LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 10, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Afghanistan's Sham Army

Kucinich: Why I Voted No

When a Time Bomb Is Ticking

Goldman Sachs Becomes 'SNL' Punchline

When Voters Disrupt the Tea Party

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * When a Time Bomb Is Ticking
Kucinich: Why I Voted No

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Pennsylvania’s ‘Faith-Based’ Primary

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Apr 21, 2008

All eyes will be on Pennsylvania Tuesday, but citizen journalist Brad Friedman wonders if all votes will be counted, especially considering that the vast majority of Pennsylvanians will be casting electronic ballots. Election integrity is one of those issues that get a lot of lip service but no real action, which is probably why we’re still talking about it in 2008.


Brad Blog:

On Tuesday night, you will be told who the winner of the Pennsylvania Primary is. You will accept it. You will have no choice. No matter who the winner really is. Or isn’t.

This Tuesday’s crucial contest will be primarily run on 100% faith-based, Direct Recording Electronic (DRE, usually touch-screen or push-button) e-voting machines across the state. There will be no way to determine after the election whether the computers have accurately recorded, or not, the intent of those voters who voted on them. As VerifiedVoting.org summarizes the crucial contest, it “will be essentially unrecountable, unverifiable, and unauditable.”

Most of the votes, more than 85%, will be cast on such DRE systems which do not provide so-called “Voter Verified Paper Audit Trails” (VVPATs), as their use has been found unconstitutional in the state, since its been determined, accurately, that ballot secrecy cannot be guaranteed when using such paper trail systems. Not that it matters.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Ed, April 22, 2008 at 11:16 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Electronic voting machines without a paper trail is a good reason why I won’t trust the outcome of the election. I believe Diebold stole Ohio for Bush in November of 2004.

If elections can be stolen without valid documentation, there’s no way to legally oust corrupt politicians. Anyone want to lead an armed revolution?

Report this

By Conservative Yankee, April 22, 2008 at 9:07 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Yo mean yo think Hill-the-business-shill, anointed queen of Democrats has to stoop to stealing the Pennsylvania and Indiana elections to get “her rightful place” on the November ballot?

Guess we haven’t come that far from “those smoke filled rooms” after all! 

The fix has been in from the Beginning.

Report this

By lenny, April 21, 2008 at 8:29 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

The democrats had a year of congressional dominance to fix this. If Obama looses they deserve to loose to Mc Bush, too.

Report this

By cyrena, April 21, 2008 at 7:29 pm #

you got that right TDoff…I mean, that’s what they tell themselves..those Texas BigOil bidnessmen…if God didn’t think it was just fine for me to lie, cheat, steal and exploit the hell out of anybody else that can’t lie, cheat, steal and exploit better than me, than it wouldn’t be.

What’s actually WORSE though, is that the one’s being exploited, cheated, and lied to seem to believe it as well. This must just be the way God planned it, and if not…then we’ll just keep praying to make it all better, or so that God will teach THEM how to lie, cheat, steal and exploit too.

God it makes me sick…

Report this

By TDoff, April 21, 2008 at 5:21 pm #

One great thing about living in a ‘christian’ nation, is that every thing’s OK. If electronic voting machines cheat one candidate or the other, that’s fine, ‘god’ must want it that way, ‘cause if ‘god’ didn’t want it, he could sure change it, couldn’t he?

That’s what Texas BigOil bidnessmen tell themselves all the time, ‘It must be OK for me to be filthy rich and screw all those people, ‘cause if ‘God’ didn’t like it, he could sure change it, couldn’t the?’

Report this

By cyrena, April 21, 2008 at 4:22 pm #

I didn’t know this. Somehow, this seems to already give us the outcome.

I guess voting by mail is also not allowed in Pennsylvania.

Jeeze…all these years later…I don’t get it.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Click here to learn more about Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.