“Screw ‘em,” Hillary Clinton told her husband. “You don’t owe [Southern working class whites] a thing, Bill. They’re doing nothing for you; you don’t have to do anything for them.”

The January 1995 Hillary Clinton “screw ‘em” admonition, is a more than apt representation of character. Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther, and goes much deeper than anyone realizes. Particularly telling, is the fact that Leon Panetta was present during Hillary’s “write them off: screw them” remark. While Hillary sees herself as the “champion of the oppressed,” there’s always a kind of “good guy versus bad guy mentality.” But Hillary has treated and continues to treat all working class Americans as a species apart, and screw them she did: http://theseedsof9-11.com

Ps. Say goodbye to the small blond man with breasts, boys.

Clinton may have said that remark, but that is not as important as the “bitter” remark that is being played in Western Pennsylvania.

About the debate I saw a conflict of interest because George S. was part of the Clinton Administration and even though he is a news commator I believe that he sided with Clinton against Obama.

The questions were silly so it looked to me like a gang up, there were shots of Chelsea and Randell which make it look cozy.

But all and all Obama held his own especially since the deck appeared stacked.

This is only relevant because it is the type of campaign Hillary has tried to turn this into - mincing and spinning every little misspoken or out-of-context phrase and encouraging the media to do the same.

Theda Skocpol of Harvard was also there, and records her remembrances at http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/04/17/what_s he_said/

She didn’t transcribe that particular quote, but her comments are revealing about HRC’s mindset at that meeting.

Consider that we pay all Senators (including Clinton) to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

So when Candidate Clinton makes more of a big deal over Obama words “bitter” and “cling” than she ever has about President Bush’s inadvertent, repeated, voluntary, public 9/11 confession statements, it’s pretty clear that she’s more for herself than she is for the Constitution.

Who thinks that any Senator who’s so miserably failed to stand up for the Constitution against terrorist-in-chief Bush will suddenly put loyalty to the Constitution ahead of all else if promoted to terrorist-in-chief (The War Against Terrorism—TWAT—is bogus!) herself (or himself, for that matter)?

Awhile back I came across an allegation that an old Rodham family name for Hillary is “Sister Frigidaire.” How true this is, and whether it still applies if true, I cannot say.

Frankly, I don’t pay attention to the trashy tabloid websites like the huffingtonpost.com that has pushed Obama candidacy from day one while censoring those who disagree with its daily dose of garbage. So called liberal websites seem to revel in censorship