Ok, this is a perfect example of what I’m talking about in the non-stop negative bashing of Barack Obama, by use of rhetorical slander..by bert. It’s less sophisticated than the Maani style, and only slightly more sophisticated than the lib style. And, it’s a simple one, so easier to point out.

Here we have a relatively short article that deals with a topic that has come up before, with much of the same ‘ta do’ about not much of anything. Whether or not Obama will do public financing for a general election, (though he still has not won the primary nomination yet). So, it’s a bit early for this, but then it was even more premature when McCain made an issue of it a couple or so months back.

Still, that’s my point. That’s what this is about. Simple enough. Obama had agreed to consider it a while back, and to talk with McCain on it, when things were more solidified on whether or not he was the nominee for the democratic party.

Now, the framing of this article has Obama ‘backtracking’ and a further read of the entire piece makes the point –immediately- that this is yet another issue that his rivals are trying to exploit. (And no doubt, they have jumped on it like white on rice…pretty desperate) However, this is one comment, from one poster on the referenced website, from which the TD article came..”Political Insider”

• “I’ve read some version of this notion a lot in the blogosphere, but as yet the only thing I’ve ever read is a commitment by Obama to negotiate in good faith with the Republican nominee. The goal there would be to try and get them both into the public financing system, if they can find a way to reasonably do so. To my ears, that falls FAR short of a promise. So please back that up with a link or something. Thanks much.”
Ok, that comment was from a reader, to the author of the article.

Now, back to bert’s comment, from shortly after the article was posted here on TD..and she is apparently responding to an earlier post by cwhipps, who suggests that a staffer checked a box on a form, regarding this issue of public financing.

Here’s what bert responds:

• “cwhipps writes:  “...some staffer checked a box on a form....”
• If Obama can’t even keep his staff on course how the hell do you expect him to run and manage the United States of America? Whay a lame brained excuse!!!!!!!
Let’s just reflect on that for a second, (and the total pettiness). If Obama can’t keep his staff on course…

Again, if Obama can’t keep his staff on course, how (the hell) can he manage to run the US of A?

Humm… has he managed to run his Senatorial Office and Staff? It sure seems like it. Has he managed to run his campaign?

Well, let’s think about that as well. He’s got a large staff for it, eh? Yep. Well, how well have they done.

Relatively simple answer here…PRETTY DAMN WELL! At least that’s what someone with even a tiny shred of objectivity might observe. In other words…he’s WAY ahead of his opponent in the delegates so far, like by 133. He’s collected nearlytwice as much money. He’s utilized his staff and organizational skills in conjunction with every technology available for communicating with the population, and done it better than every other person in the race. And bert wants to know how he can manage to run the US of A, if he CAN’T KEEP HIS STAFF ON COURSE?

His opponent can’t keep her chief strategist from cutting trade deals with foreign countries that she allegedly DOESN’T APPROVE OF, and bert wants to claim that Obama can’t keep his staff on course!

THAT’S the kind of stuff I’m talking about. Stupid stuff, that defies the on-going reality of life as it is. It’s all just negative rhetoric about obvious stuff. And when somebody does this about OBVIOUS stuff, (like Hillary lying about the Bosnia thing..what was the point?) they lose all credibility when they might actually come up with some LEGITIMATE CRITICISM!

But, they don’t get it.

End of example.

cwhipps writes:  “...some staffer checked a box on a form....”

If Obama can’t even keep his staff on course how the hell do you expect him to run and manage the United States of America? Whay a lame brained excuse!!!!!!!

After all the Jack Abramov’s, and the Swift Boat Veterans, it’s only common sense to keep the dollars pouring in. Democrat’s know what’s coming with Rev. Write, and all the other empty, lizard brain, Frank Luntz focus group propaganda the GOP is getting together. It would be foolish to stand on priciple when it gives such a huge advantage to the party of BIG BUSINESS. Remember the Clear Channel media blitz of 911 lies in 2004?

And, I’m not sure he agreed to use public financing, some staffer checked a box on a form and the form only says that he’ll “discuss” public financing.

I think this might be another of many recent false flag ops by Ken Mehlman.