LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.   Gore Vidal and Mr. Fish - Exclusive Truthdig Gifts for the Holidays
 
December 1, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Afghanistan in Crisis

Report: WMD Terror Attack Likely

Confronting the Terrorist Within

Bush’s 11th-Hour Bid for Secrecy

They’re Here, They’re Queer, and They’re … Well-Organized

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Afghanistan in Crisis
Our Dear Leader

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

More Trouble for Iraq’s PM

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Apr 4, 2008

Iraq’s Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki faced a crisis last week when 1,000 to 1,500 of his troops, including from several dozen to more than 100 officers, refused to fight in the battle against Shiite militia members in Basra, raising questions about Iraqi security force readiness.

The fighting ceased when Moqtada al-Sadr asked his Mahdi Army to stand down. On Thursday, Sadr called for a million-person march to the Shiite holy city of Najaf next week to protest the American presence. Look for more fireworks between Maliki and Sadr.

New York Times:

More than 1,000 Iraqi soldiers and policemen either refused to fight or simply abandoned their posts during the inconclusive assault against Shiite militias in Basra last week, a senior Iraqi government official said Thursday. Iraqi military officials said the group included dozens of officers, including at least two senior field commanders in the battle.

The desertions in the heat of a major battle cast fresh doubt on the effectiveness of the American-trained Iraqi security forces. The White House has conditioned further withdrawals of American troops on the readiness of the Iraqi military and police.

The crisis created by the desertions and other problems with the Basra operation was serious enough that Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki hastily began funneling some 10,000 recruits from local Shiite tribes into his armed forces. That move has already generated anger among Sunni tribesmen whom Mr. Maliki has been much less eager to recruit despite their cooperation with the government in its fight against Sunni insurgents and criminal gangs.

Read more

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: You Are Now Free to Blow the Whistle

Next item: Clinton Releases Tax Returns

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By cyrena, April 7 at 12:29 am #

Just to add to this solution from Fadel,

It worked for Gandhi and the patriots who believed in themselves.

Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, April 6 at 9:41 am #

Nefetiti, daughter of bleeding Egypt if my guess is correct, greetings!

Your statements in diagnosing the sad situation of the Arab world are correct. However, you stop short of prescribing a solution. So, here’s my suggestion for a possible solution.

In Egypt, for example, all what it takes is for 2-3 million courageous Egyptians to march on the presidential palace of Hosni Mubarak, stage a long term civil disobedience and demand that Mubarak step down or otherwise. The military might be called to suppress the revolution, but they will not be able to handle 2-3 million steadfast patriots. They might shoot into the crowd and few hundreds might by killed, but eventually they will prevail, and then the majority of the suppressed masses will eventually join in to ensure the dismantling of the corrupt and undemocratic Mubarak’s regime.

Then this process could be repeated in other Arab country such as Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Algeria and so on.

Remember how the Shah of Iran was toppled! He was the most cruel dictator of the area, with the most powerful army and most notoriously ruthless secret police apparatus, but when few millions of Iranians took to the streets in a peaceful revolution, he was forced to flee the country. The CIA and all American might that brought him to power could not do much to save him against his angry subjects.

Though the situation in Iran after and since the revolution might not be considered by some as the perfect ideal situation, it’s, nevertheless, a lot better than what it was under the Shah. And though the U.S. and Israel’s political-military establishments hate the current regime in Iran, I, for one, take this as an indication that Iran is on the right path as far as the the majority of Iranians are concerned.

Report this

By nefertiti, April 6 at 7:49 am #

purplegirl

we do know our leaders have sold us out a long long time ago , you should hear what viewers say on Most Arabic channels , the disgust they feel against the rulers , most call them puppets, weak traitors, quislings, cowards . many want them out and be replaced . but no one does anything about it . the fear is such you dont know who to trust , people speak out on phones and net but they wont say anything at work or in the neigbourhood in case the neighbour or colleague at work is from the intelligence bureau . people are scared to lose their jobs and find themselves on their own fighting ruthless leader . sometimes i ask myself where are our brave men ? those who liberated Algeria from the french empire ? where is Omar al Mukhtar and people like him , or emir Abdelkader , we have none . some have sold thier soul to the dollar and write dispicable columns to please the dictator , others are simply busy working to provide food for the family and life goes on , while we still feel disgust and despair .

Report this

By cyrena, April 5 at 5:29 am #

Rapid Withdrawal Is Only Solution

By William E. Odom, lieutenant general, USA (retired)

Information Clearinghouse
Wednesday 02 April 2008

Testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Iraq.

Good morning Mr. Chairman and members of the committee. It is an honor to appear before you again. The last occasion was in January 2007, when the topic was the troop surge. Today you are asking if it has worked. Last year I rejected the claim that it was a new strategy. Rather, I said, it is a new tactic used to achieve the same old strategic aim, political stability. And I foresaw no serious prospects for success.

I see no reason to change my judgment now. The surge is prolonging instability, not creating the conditions for unity as the president claims.

Last year, General Petraeus wisely declined to promise a military solution to this political problem, saying that he could lower the level of violence, allowing a limited time for the Iraqi leaders to strike a political deal. Violence has been temporarily reduced but today there is credible evidence that the political situation is far more fragmented. And currently we see violence surge in Baghdad and Basra. In fact, it has also remained sporadic and significant inseveral other parts of Iraq over the past year, notwithstanding the notable drop in Baghdad and Anbar Province.

More disturbing, Prime Minister Maliki has initiated military action and then dragged in US forces to help his own troops destroy his Shiite competitors. This is a political setback, not a political solution. Such is the result of the surge tactic.

No less disturbing has been the steady violence in the Mosul area, and the tensions in Kirkuk between Kurds, Arabs, and Turkomen. A showdown over control of the oil fields there surely awaits us. And the idea that some kind of a federal solution can cut this Gordian knot strikes me as a wild fantasy, wholly out of touch with Kurdish realities.

Also disturbing is Turkey’s military incursion to destroy Kurdish PKK groups in the border region. That confronted the US government with a choice: either to support its NATO ally, or to make good on its commitment to Kurdish leaders to insure their security. It chose the former, and that makes it clear to the Kurds that the United States will sacrifice their security to its larger interests in Turkey.

Turning to the apparent success in Anbar province and a few other Sunni areas, this is not the positive situation it is purported to be. Certainly violence has declined as local Sunni shieks have begun to cooperate with US forces. But the surge tactic cannot be given full credit. The decline started earlier on Sunni initiative. What are their motives? First, anger at al Qaeda operatives and second, their financial plight.

Their break with al Qaeda should give us little comfort. The Sunnis welcomed anyone who would help them kill Americans, including al Qaeda. The concern we hear the president and his aides express about a residual base left for al Qaeda if we withdraw is utter nonsense. The Sunnis will soon destroy al Qaeda if we leave Iraq. The Kurds do not allow them in their region, and the Shiites, like the Iranians, detest al Qaeda. To understand why, one need only take note of the al Qaeda public diplomacy campaign over the past year or so on internet blogs. They implore the United States to bomb and invade Iran and destroy this apostate Shiite regime. As an aside, it gives me pause to learn that our vice president and some members of the Senate are aligned with al Qaeda on spreading the war to Iran.

More at the link

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040408D.shtml

No surprises on this last part. Our “VP” has been doing whatever he can to spread the war to Iran. It was the plan all along.

Report this

By Purple Girl, April 5 at 3:42 am #

This War is about Oil Territory and Control.
The Goal is to place these nations in the hands of the UAE who are working in conjunction with the Oil Incs. It amazes me that the People of the Region have not realized many of their leaders and ‘royal families’ Sold them Out decades ago, but use US as the deflection shield to mask their crimes against their Own people.
So how’s those ‘Royal Families’ doing? As well as Cheney & the Clintons? Face it may Middle Eastern Friends We have All been had and are now being Used to boost their Bottom Line and Sell Us all as commodies on the Global Market- indentured Slavery- with ‘Futures’ to boot.

Report this

By mill, April 4 at 11:46 pm #

we fight Sunni’s, then cut a deal with some so they’ll reject AlQuada.  we fight Sadr’s bunch off and on; we support Maliki’s side, but he and Sadr both are friendly to Iran as Shiites; we support the Kurds except when they’re fighting our NATO friend Turkey

we should not be providing support for a government that doesn’t represent the 3 major groups, especially when they’re going at each other.

shoot back at those who shoot at us on our way out of Iraq.  we can’t fix it, and our involvement makes things worse through our constantly shifting, frequently misguided policies

was Cheney really involved in this latest action around Basra, pushing Maliki to go after the Shia down there?  that guy is a clusterf$%k - everything he does makes things worse for the US, assuming his influence in this

Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, April 4 at 8:07 pm #

I agree with you MaryinNC. But to describe the situation Bush and gang created in Iraq as mere “mess” is indeed an understatement. What they did in Iraq is the greatest crime against humanity and environment in modern human history.

Nothing will come close to bringing justice to the untold numbers of victims of this Holocaust short of bringing Bush and gang to a World Court of Justice and have them hanged in the same way Saddam was hanged!

Report this

By P. T., April 4 at 3:39 pm #

Not even Iraqi Shiites support the Shiite Maliki’s government.  What a joke!

Report this

By Gmonst, April 4 at 3:03 pm #

I agree with you Mary.  This is really a lost cause, and shows that the Iraqis may have a chance of working things out if we would only get out of the way.  Unfortunately the powers that be are set on having the new Iraq be friendly to US “interests.” That means more fighting and further fragmentation and chaos.  Its not good any way you slice it and the longer we are there the worse its going to be.  Tom Engelhardt wrote a wonderful piece on this situation which can be found Here and is worth a read.

Report this

By pacrat, April 4 at 2:33 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

The Iraqis will fight eachother on their own terms - not when America’s front guy. Maliki, decides. Or was this all a stunt to keep the US there?

One of the most stupid moves of the US was to disband the army - and allow them to keep their weapons. Of course, since they have been able to capture weapons at will, is it any wonder that there will be armed battles.

If the US didn’t come in with their bombers and weapons of mass destruction, the Iraqi government would never have attempted to show their muscle.

What an embarassment for the Iraqi government and for the US!

Report this

By MaryinNC, April 4 at 12:24 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

The Iraqi military is comprised of all segments of the population, so why would one brother fight another brother.  Stories are abound about the usa civil war where many men had serious objections to fighting against each other.
This is a lost cause for usa in Iraq.  Aren’t the warmongers aware that it’s a civil war.  The shia population comprise about 60% and is supported by Iran.  The PM is supported by Iran.  Al-Sadr is supported by Iran.  Who supports usa?  Nobody.  The world told GWB not to go into Iraq.  But he did and he alone created the mess.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.