|
|
May 25, 2013
|
|
An Absolut ControversyPosted on Apr 4, 2008
The Swedish vodka company known for its memorable advertising has stirred a bit of controversy in the United States with an ad running in Mexico that shows what the two countries would look like “in an Absolut world.” Some have called the ad offensive, but can it really be that offensive that Mexicans would imagine a perfect world as one in which they hadn’t lost half of their country? Update: A Truthdig reader points out that in an “Absolut world,” Panama remains independent from Colombia.
Advertisement New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Ben Franklin, April 8, 2008 at 8:52 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
You said it Sister!!!
This is the propoganda media putting it’s spin on things to make people angry at each other. Stop the madness and start raging against the machine that threatens to enslave us all.
Report thisBy whatever, April 8, 2008 at 8:11 am Link to this comment
Oh my the truth comes out. It’s ashame that the US has been infested, but that is the plain truth and the powers that be have let it happen. All in the name of cheap labor and political correctness. Absolut has gotten a lot of free publicity from this “shock” ad. That’s nothing new. It’s interesting the parallel between the infestation and the fact that alcohol-related accidents, injuries, and social disorder both have brought the US to it’s economic knees. America is for sale my friend. Look around you.
Report thisBy mill, April 7, 2008 at 10:23 am Link to this comment
The ad is funny in a barbed sort of way. As a resident in Estados Unidos, the barb is in my patriotic butt. Thanks for that
I drink vodka, including theirs. I like other vodka brands, so I’ll probably buy someone else’s product as a way to say thanks for needling me.
Report thisBy William Ramblau, April 6, 2008 at 9:14 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
the only thing Mexico can have back are 20 million illegal Mexicans.
Report thisBy jimmyjam, April 6, 2008 at 5:44 am Link to this comment
And, what does the John McCain liquor Dynasty have to say about all of this. he says nothing it belongs to his wife’s family. I,m sure bert and the others can get up some money to send you to Sweden
Report thisBy cyrena, April 6, 2008 at 1:27 am Link to this comment
Sweden is an EXCELLENT choice. (even the prisons are posh).
Thing is, one needs a lot of money to live there. Or, I should say to establish residency. The Swedish government requires a pretty substantial bank deposit for any foreigners to set up residency there.
BUT, if you have enough of it, (and if it’s in USD, you should hurry, while it’s still got some tad bit of value left) then THAT would be the place.
If I had some money, that’s where I’d defect to myself.
Report thisBy cwhipps, April 6, 2008 at 12:20 am Link to this comment
Was that Pat Buchanan’s head I just heard explode?
Report thisBy Marshall K, April 5, 2008 at 2:42 pm Link to this comment
But only if they take W and Jerry Jones.
Report thisBy Bill Blackolive, April 5, 2008 at 8:04 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
This is some very funny stuff. While at this point after Jefferson and Monroe had agreed all south is ourn and folks went poorer and got shot in sake of the Land of Freedom, and hungrier than ever folks coming to toil even sometimes/often bring their children, and now the Monroe Doctrine is finished and the Chinese move into S. America and Chavez laughs and then poetic Morales laughs and the other Presidents start laughing and the Fake War on Drugs worth never to be counted billions or trillions strapping US economy and world economy bring gunfights upon US ranches and cities, and and see news of young gringos selling armor piercing weaponry to cartels and cops join up or flee, it becomes ever funnier.
Report thisBy Jim Yell, April 5, 2008 at 7:49 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Where did Mexico lose their land? The claim that Mexico had north of the border was based upon land grab by the Spanish, transfered to Mexico when it became independant. Except for a very small part of the land that was actually inhabited by Mexicans and subject to Mexican Government the land was in the hands of the historical population. The land the Mexicans controlled, as little as it was, was stolen from the historical population of these areas, or another way to put it if our claim is not valid than how could Mexico’s have ever been valid too?
As to stolen land there were not monolithic governments amongest the historic populations in America before or after the conquest. The different tribes did exactly what Europeans did, if they wanted it they took it, either driving out the historic inhabitants, absorbing them or killing them. Enough of this sillyness.
Mexico is a rich and beautiful land and is abused by its upper classes and overpopulated by the majority. Even the most extravagant pie, can be unsatisfactory when made into too many slices.
There is no Mexico North of the Border.
Report thisBy Dr. Knowitall, PhD, PhD, April 5, 2008 at 4:41 am Link to this comment
I always thought the solution to the republicans bitching about Mexicans would be for the US to annex Mexico—or the other way around—and I don’t even drink vodka.
Sweden is just one place I might defect to.
Report thisBy Purple Girl, April 5, 2008 at 4:29 am Link to this comment
I at one time relished the Idea that All antions would come together under One Flag. But now I see the the Thesis in Progress and am Terrified by the implication. I ‘Imagine’d it would mean ‘Peace’ but instead it means Total Control of Mankind. The Entities see Us all as Commodities, to be Bought & sold on a Global Auction Block. This is Not ‘Walden’ it is the New World Order Constucted by people who want unbridled Power. This is some twisted crap coming to Fruition and it must be Stopped by those who’s Futures they are also Selling to the Highest Bidders.
Report thisBy Expat, April 5, 2008 at 2:46 am Link to this comment
^ goes. Be interesting to see a map of the western hemisphere pre 1492. Mexico was not Mexico and the United States wasn’t even a thought. It would be a very interesting world if the indigenes were still living on their ancestral lands. Yes, I know, lets not think too much about that; too much guilt. Anyway for those interested heres a link to that map.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Native_America-1492AD-big.jpg
Report thisBy cyrena, April 4, 2008 at 9:36 pm Link to this comment
Ucedo, who is from Argentina, said: Mexicans talk about how the Americans stole their land, so this is their way of reclaiming it. Its very relevant and the Mexicans will love the idea.
But he said that were the campaign to run in the United States, it might fall flat
Oh I dont know about the campaign falling flat in the United States. I dont have a problem with it at all. Matter-of-fact, it might even induce me to start drinking again. Which one is cheaper, the Stolichnaya or the Absolut?
And, what does the John McCain liquor Dynasty have to say about all of this. From the looks of this map, his Arizona headquarters is part of the New (I mean Old) territory. Could make for some territorial or jurisdictional problems in the free market competition.
Report thisBy B., April 4, 2008 at 9:21 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
viral marketing works. to wit: (see above).
Report thisBy P. T., April 4, 2008 at 7:35 pm Link to this comment
That would have made for a really long border fence. But, hey, the Swedish Viking marauders themselves were not exactly known for staying at home.
Report thisBy Kenneth Marcus, April 4, 2008 at 6:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
We’ve done a lot worse, and this ad is extremely clever, not to mention well-suited to its target market. Excellent!
Report this