LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.   Exclusive Truthdig Gifts! Mr. Fish Signed Prints and T-shirts - Gore Vidal Signed First Editions
December 2, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Addicted to Nonsense

Rep. Dennis Kucinich Addresses Escalation in Afghanistan

Canada's Olympic Crackdown

Time for Our Second Bill of Rights

Reality TV Hits a New Low With Disabled Model Show?

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * The Copenhagen Conundrum

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

New York Times Up for Grabs?

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Apr 2, 2008
Flickr / digiart2001

There was the Jason Blair scandal, the Judith Miller WMD fiasco, the John McCain (yawn) brouhaha and the appointment of neocon “never-get-it-right” William Kristol as an Op-Ed columnist, to mention a few New York Times blunders. All that and a shareholders’ assault make the Sulzbergers’ lock on ownership of The New York Times seem not entirely impregnable, explains Vanity Fair’s Michael Wolff.


Vanity Fair:

Happy newspaper families are alike, and, it seems, unhappy newspaper families are alike, too: in the end they all lose their papers.

The Sulzbergers of The New York Times, along with the Grahams of The Washington Post and, until recently, the Bancrofts of The Wall Street Journal, have been among the most peaceable, stalwart, and worthy newspaper families of the ages, marrying the salubriousness of wealth and prestige with the virtues of enlightened ownership. What’s more, the Sulzbergers pioneered a historic family-and-corporate-ownership structure which was, in theory, next to impossible for an unwelcome outsider to mess with.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Thomas Billis, April 4, 2008 at 2:04 pm #

The NYT’s has one asset Frank Rich.The rest of it could be used to line the bottom of bird cages.

Report this

By Howard, April 4, 2008 at 9:49 am #

One of the best in the world, if not THE best.

Report this

By cyrena, April 4, 2008 at 5:41 am #

“...No one “blunders” into cahoots with the likes of the Judas Kristol.”...

Excellent point CPTL. It’s not really a ‘mistake’ now is it?

Then there’s the even sadder part that weather has already noted…The Times died on 9/11, when it failed to investigate the biggest crime ever committed against the U.S.A.

That’s NOT to say how terribly sad I am, and I agree with the poster “scared by repuglicans”. The death of the NYT is yet another fatality of the Dick Bush regime.

The NYT is not alone in this death as an entity. But the people who created it and kept it alive for so long, WILL live on…those who have contributed to the former intergrity and wealth that it once represented..the real journalists and all of the others that made it what it was for so long.

So, those ‘types’ of people will weather the storm, and hopefully rebuild.

At least that’s what I want to believe.

We’ll see.

Report this

By republicanSScareme, April 4, 2008 at 1:08 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

One of the saddest casualities of the Bush-Zionist Administration is the transformation of the New York Times from the dean of American newspapers to the laughing stock of world journalism.

Good job, boys.

Report this

By C.P.T.L., April 3, 2008 at 8:57 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

No one “blunders” into cahoots with the likes of the Judas Kristol.


It does not take a grand knowledge of politics or much understanding of one’s fellow man. A simple ration of common sense and native decency is enough to establish:


There are two types of people: those who have the smallest thing to do with William Kristol, and those who do not.

Report this

By DennisD, April 3, 2008 at 6:36 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

They sold their journalistic integrity a long time ago so what’s the big deal about selling a brand name with nothing behind it. It couldn’t be more American.

Report this

By weather, April 3, 2008 at 6:52 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

The NY Times died on 9/11

Report this

By weather, April 3, 2008 at 4:00 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

its very spirit got crushed in its own rubble.

The publishers and editorial board were far too busy looking at their new Renzo Piano bespoke office plans than to have investigated w/even a modicum of integrity a horrible crime commited in broad daylight right down the street.

A newspaper that lies to itself, marginalized itself.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.