LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.   Exclusive Truthdig Merchandise: Mr. Fish T-shirts and Signed Prints
November 10, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Afghanistan's Sham Army

Kucinich: Why I Voted No

When Voters Disrupt the Tea Party

Goldman Sachs Becomes 'SNL' Punchline

Obama, Netanyahu Meet in Private

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * When a Time Bomb Is Ticking
Kucinich: Why I Voted No

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Beyond Bogotá

Beyond Bogotá

By Garry Leech
$17.13

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

‘Nonlethal’ Stun Gun Claims Another Life

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Apr 2, 2008
Taser OC-Style
flickr.com / Willie Stark

Jason Jesus Gomez’s death comes just five months after the death of another inmate after deputies used a stun gun to subdue him.

In what seems to be an all too common occurrence across the U.S., an inmate has died in California after being shocked with a taser by sheriff’s deputies. Jason Jesus Gomez is the latest casualty at the hands of the infamous Orange County Sheriff’s Department.

The Los Angeles Times:

An Orange County jail inmate who spent a week in a coma after a violent confrontation with sheriff’s deputies has died, a deputy coroner said today.

Sheriff’s deputies used Taser stun weapons to subdue Jason Jesus Gomez in his cell at the Intake Release Center in Santa Ana. Gomez, 35, who was in jail for a probation violation, stopped breathing after the confrontation and was resuscitated by paramedics.
He spent a week in a coma at Western Medical Center in Santa Ana. A deputy coroner who would not identify himself said today that Gomez had died. He would not say whether Gomez died last night or today and referred calls to the district attorney’s office, which is investigating the incident.

The Orange County district attorney’s office has opened an investigation into the violent struggle between sheriff’s deputies and Gomez, who had a lengthy criminal record. The action is the latest setback to the Sheriff’s Department as it struggles to recover from a series of allegations involving the treatment of inmates.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Conservative Yankee, April 3, 2008 at 12:20 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Excited-Delirium asks:

“Do prisons have to publicly report their use and misuse of the taser? Or are they permitted to use them for purposes of torture and pain compliance without any oversight whatsoever? Do we only hear about it when inmates die?”

Interesting question. Ive seen torture in juvenile facilities, so I imagine it happens in adult facilities also. One reform school (where I worked) had a bed, with the mattress removed, and a metal flat spring. Children (as young as 12) were strapped to this device and electricity (provided by an ignition coil) was sent through the spring causing such pain as to contort small bodies in unbelievable ways.

I assume there are sadists in adult facilities also!

Report this

By Outraged, April 3, 2008 at 11:12 am #

Tasers should be outlawed.  The blatant fact is THEY DO KILL PEOPLE.  They are LETHAL.  Aside from that simply because they carry the label “non-lethal” they are overused and under-reported.  Tasers ARE weapons and should be treated as such.

A Canadian TV station did an in-depth report on Tasers and found that the original “acceptable standard” of shock is not what most newer Tasers actually provide.  The shock is much higher since the company had gotten complaints from officers about the Taser’s “ineffectiveness”.  (One might imagine that it MAY have been non-lethal at that point)  It also found that every single “researcher” or “tester” involved in Taser acceptability and safety standards had a link to the company itself.  Every single one, therefore unbiased acceptability standards do not exist. (at least at the time of the report, about 6mo ago+/-)

Report this

By Jim Yell, April 3, 2008 at 9:38 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Allowing people to believe that using certain things like tasers and pepper spray are benign means of crowd control, encourages their use merely to control everyone even those involved in none threatening protest.

I am sorry that I didn’t make a note of the evil congress person who authored the spraying of pepper spray into the eyes of passive protestors in his office. And, I haven’t forgotten the hyped new microwave to make people believe they are on fire. All of these things are being used and going to be used not just on criminals, but on ordinary citizens trying to get their elected and appointed officials attention when these officials are being bullying and working against their interests.

It is not a good idea.

Report this

By Matt, April 3, 2008 at 8:52 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

The purpose of your retort is that the taser works off of “near” lethal amperage?  The time the taser is applied and where it is applied also must be factored. 
Fatal ratings are from 0.006-0.2 amps or 6ma to 200ma passed across the heart for 1-3 seconds. 

You must also factor in the relative health condition of the person shocked, condition of the heart and the sodium content of the blood.  Additionally the external resistance of the body is high (~300K) when dry and low (~30K) when sweaty, which factors into the level of the amperage encountered. 
Given that fact that there was a struggle before the inmate was tasered, his external resistance was probably low; being in a mostly dormant state he was most likely in poor health and guards train themselves to “shoot” center mass which equates to very close proximity to the heart.  All of these things should equal to near fatal results. 

Though the design of the taser is not to stimulate the heart but to neutralize the nerve endings and thereby locking the muscles temporarily.  It may be necessary to limit the number of shocks per deployment of the wires.  Additional shocks could result in fatalities.

Report this

By Excited-Delirium.com, April 2, 2008 at 6:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

“He was a threat!”

Ah, he was already in jail.

“He was high on cocaine and booze and had been up all night partying!”

See above.

“The X26 taser is only 2 mA (average) which is perfectly safe.”

Misleading. It is 151 mA RMS which some may claim is perfectly dangerous (and seems to match the apparent death rate). Household power is 115 volts RMS, but ZERO volts average. Do you think that your power bill based on average or RMS?

Do prisons have to publicly report their use and misuse of the taser? Or are they permitted to use them for purposes of torture and pain compliance without any oversight whatsoever? Do we only hear about it when inmates die?

http://www.Excited-Delirium.com

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Click here to learn more about Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.