LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.   Exclusive Truthdig Merchandise - Gore Vidal signed first editions - Signed Mr. Fish prints
 
May 11, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Reports

Arts & Culture

Digs
Inside the Data Mine

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Truthdig Bazaar
The Impeachment of George W. Bush

The Impeachment of George W. Bush

By Elizabeth Holtzman and Cynthia L. Cooper
$10.17

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

U.S. Troop Levels Likely to Stay Level in Iraq

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Mar 24, 2008
U.S. troops in Iraq
AP photo / Sgt. Armando Monroig, U.S. Army

Americans serving in Iraq will have to wait until the next president takes office before they can expect any substantial changes in troop numbers, if Bush follows the latest recommended plan from Gen. David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker.


The New York Times:

General Petraeus, speaking to Mr. Bush by secure videoconference during a two-hour meeting of the National Security Council, recommended putting off decisions on further troop reductions for a month or two after the departure in July of five extra brigades sent last year to help secure the nation, the officials said. They spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to speak freely about internal deliberations.

There would be more frequent reviews after that to see when withdrawals might be allowed to resume, without any predetermined outcome and, given the time required to put troops into motion, little likelihood of big reductions on short timetables.

During the briefing to the president, General Petraeus laid out a number of potential options, the officials said, but avoided using the term “pause.” That word has gained traction here in Washington over recent weeks to describe the plateau in troop levels that is widely expected to last through the fall elections and perhaps beyond.

Read more

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: China Cries Foul Over Tibet Coverage

Next item: Step Away From the Blackberry

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments: 9 Published. Add Yours?

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By DennisD, March 25 at 12:55 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Optimist or Pessimist

U.S. Troop Levels Likely to Stay Level in Iraq -

Until they completely burn out our military that is.

The fantasy of Iraq being a “secure nation” while in reality destroying our own could only be thought of as progress in the District of Corruption.

In Washington the optimist views the toilet half full of sh*t, the pessimist half empty. You can attach the D’s & R’s wherever you like.

Reply to this | Report this

By Typical White Person, March 25 at 7:49 am #
(53 comments total)

What about

the newly anointed leader of the free world? He said he would get the troops out a.s.a.p. I guess he was exaggerating a little.

Reply to this | Report this

By Purple Girl, March 25 at 4:17 am #
(199 comments total)

"SO'" is a Confession of Treason

Two little letters -Soooo Many Indictments.
‘For the People By the People” a Free ‘Democracy’, “WE THE PEOPLE” which phrase does Dick Not comprehend???? 2/3 majority???
Anyone who claims to be a Public Servant should be seizing this moment (and Cheney). We ahve all th eEvidence We need- Cough up the Footage & Quotes Media! At Least Our Principles still have some Voice on PBS, Frontline “Bush’s War” (shouldn’t give credit to a stooge - just charges of Complicity).
WE do not need to Bear Arms to fight this Revolution, just the Laws we were Founding On.
Frankly th eArmed Services would serve US better if they Protected and Defended US from our Domestic Enemies First!

Reply to this | Report this

By Expat, March 25 at 4:15 am #
(828 comments total)

Oops, my comment below was........

^ directed to Non Credo.

Reply to this | Report this

By Expat, March 25 at 4:13 am #
(828 comments total)

As one of the more.........

^ enlightened posters here; I know yours is a rhetorical question....yes?  It’s the height of irony that the MSM is not covering the “news”, but it’s the very thing people seek for “information” and the alternative news media (Democracy Now; one example), which actually tells us the facts, is unknown to the majority of American citizens.  What does this say about us?

Reply to this | Hide 1 reply | Report this

By Non Credo, March 25 at 12:29 pm #
(1104 comments total)

Re: As one of the more.........

Oh yeah, the question was rhetorical for sure.

I ask a lot of rhetorical questions these days, because it helps me pass the time while my country is burning to the ground.

I mean, after you’ve listened to Democracy Now, and cried, and had a beer, what more can you do except maybe ask a rhetorical question (don’t answer that...)?

Reply to this | Report this

By Non Credo, March 25 at 3:15 am #
(1104 comments total)

"Surge": Why does the media use Bush's false

The word “surge” implies a sudden rise, followed by a fall. The profile of a surge is a kind of parabola. But what we have here is no surge. It is a broad escalation to a higher plateau with no end in sight.

So the term “surge” is a complete lie. Why oh why do the media keep using this word that was always and obviously a big fat lie? Why do journalists all have to speak fluent bullshit, as though it’s acceptable to have feces come out of your mouth when you open it?

Reply to this | Hide 2 replies | Report this

By Marshall, March 25 at 2:49 pm #
(358 comments total)

Re: "Surge": Why does the media use Bush's

Why is it a lie… because we haven’t started on the down slope of the parabola?  The stated intention is to reduce troops and I see no reason why this wouldn’t be the intention.

Reply to this | Report this

By PatrickHenry, March 25 at 2:38 pm #
(1074 comments total)

Re: "Surge": Why does the media use Bush's

Surge = A wave in the sea of Bush’s bullshit.

He’s riding the wave.

Reply to this | Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
Robert Scheer's new book offers first-hand insight into the presidential mind
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.