LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 21, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Intelligentsia Against Intelligence

Lipstick on a Rogue

The Afghanistan Speech Obama Should Give (but Won't)

Who Are You and What Have You Done With the Community Organizer We Elected President?

Throw the Money Changers Out of the Temple

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Enough G-2 Talk Already
Despite Subsidies, Class Sizes Rise in California Schools

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
 * NEW! * Freedom’s Fight: Part II

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Back to Work

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Mar 13, 2008
capital building
aoc.gov

All three presidential candidates are scheduled to be back in Washington, D.C., on Thursday. A Republican senator has proposed a yearlong ban on earmarks and, shocking though it may seem, John McCain, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are apparently on board with the idea. Their colleagues in the Senate, however, are somewhat less enthusiastic.

Congress also expects to vote on a budget framework and tax proposals.


Politico:

The Senate is expected to vote Thursday on a one-year moratorium on earmarks, a proposal that has pitted presidential candidates John McCain, Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton against some of their parties’ leaders and driven a wedge between fiscal conservatives and old-bull Senate appropriators who don’t take kindly to the intrusion on their turf.

At the center of it all is Sen. Jim DeMint.

The first-term South Carolina Republican introduced the earmark moratorium after becoming convinced that the GOP’s participation in the provisioning of home-state pork—as well as its ties to lobbyists and all their “shameless requests”—had cost the party control of the House and the Senate in 2006.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By rowdy, March 14, 2008 at 1:26 pm #

the economy is in the dumpster. don’t you read the news? does all of your info come from “rush”? you are absolutely “clueless”. MORON

Report this

By Marshall, March 14, 2008 at 1:14 am #

From the AP story: “Democrats said [Bush] squandered trillions of dollars in projected surpluses that he inherited in 2001.”

Their ability to twist history is fully operational.  a) how do you squander “projected” surpluses?  b) those projected surpluses melted away with the dot.com bust which had nothing to do with Bush.  Only after he subsequently passed tax cuts did the economy rebound.

This is one main reason I could NEVER be a Democrat.  When it comes to fiscal policy, they are absolutely, positively clueless.

Report this

By Marshall K, March 13, 2008 at 2:34 pm #

Yeah, his balls.

Report this

By DennisD, March 13, 2008 at 10:31 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Back to what “work”. Since when is doing political favors for your friends and handing out taxpayer dollars considered work. 

Nice job if you can afford to buy your way into it. So they’re now going to consider a bill that changes the word “earmark” to something else for a whole year. Things must be slow on the steroid front.

Just call it what it is - a “kickback”.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
Chrome Bag - Free Shipping
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.