![]() |
|
||
|
Back to WorkPosted on Mar 13, 2008
All three presidential candidates are scheduled to be back in Washington, D.C., on Thursday. A Republican senator has proposed a yearlong ban on earmarks and, shocking though it may seem, John McCain, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are apparently on board with the idea. Their colleagues in the Senate, however, are somewhat less enthusiastic. Congress also expects to vote on a budget framework and tax proposals.
Advertisement Previous item: Americans Want a Democrat ... or McCain Next item: Ferraro Resigns, Clinton Apologizes Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By rowdy, March 14, 2008 at 1:26 pm #
the economy is in the dumpster. don’t you read the news? does all of your info come from “rush”? you are absolutely “clueless”. MORON
Report thisBy Marshall, March 14, 2008 at 1:14 am #
From the AP story: “Democrats said [Bush] squandered trillions of dollars in projected surpluses that he inherited in 2001.”
Their ability to twist history is fully operational. a) how do you squander “projected” surpluses? b) those projected surpluses melted away with the dot.com bust which had nothing to do with Bush. Only after he subsequently passed tax cuts did the economy rebound.
This is one main reason I could NEVER be a Democrat. When it comes to fiscal policy, they are absolutely, positively clueless.
Report thisBy Marshall K, March 13, 2008 at 2:34 pm #
Yeah, his balls.
Report thisBy DennisD, March 13, 2008 at 10:31 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Back to what “work”. Since when is doing political favors for your friends and handing out taxpayer dollars considered work.
Nice job if you can afford to buy your way into it. So they’re now going to consider a bill that changes the word “earmark” to something else for a whole year. Things must be slow on the steroid front.
Just call it what it is - a “kickback”.
Report this