![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Chris Hedges: ‘Lay Off Nader’Posted on Mar 10, 2008Truthdig columnist Chris Hedges argues in the Philadelphia Inquirer that Ralph Nader may not win, but “[h]e is the only candidate who has not lined his pockets with tens of millions of dollars of corporate campaign money, [not] talked out of both sides of his mouth about the war in Iraq, NAFTA and health care, and has dedicated his life to battling the corporations who make war on working men and women.”
Previous item: Welcome Back, Mitt? Next item: What's Up With Texas? Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
By Seanchai, March 12 at 1:15 am # Yes, butI used to be a Ralph-o-file, but look at his choice for a running mate - the lame-brained Matt Gonzales, who ran for Mayor of SF as a Green a few years ago and didn’t support the Green candidate for President. “I’m for Dennis Kucinich,” he replied when asked. There’s nothing wrong with supporting Kucinich, but if you’re a Green, you should support the Green Party’s candidates, at least publicly. Thankfully, Newsome won. Ralph should have done a better job picking a number two.
By David, March 11 at 8:28 pm # You guys Need to re-evaluate what you areHi, The democrats are not angels and they have done a lot of damage to the middle class but they do not have a desire to lead a messianic crusade of madness accross the world. The democrats are corrupt and in many cases completely cynical in how they exploit the poor but Al Gore would not have taken this country into Iraq and would have done something about global warming as opposed to absolutely nothing from GW Bush. When you guys are celebrating Nader’s run remember neither Clinton nor Obama have sung songs about bombing Iran. I think the lesser of 2 evils is far better then a war mongering nut-case in the form of McCain. I hope Nader see’s the wisdom here and ends his candidacy and the democrats are able to unite behind a candidate and soon or the Republicans will have the first mover advantage. Thanks,
By MackTN, March 11 at 1:35 pm # Yes! Expat!Just look at the issues listed on Nader’s web site votenader.com. Which of our candidates is talking about any of them? What happened to single payer health care? Before Nader stepped in, he supported John Edwards’ candidacy. Why? John Edwards doesn’t equivocate. He recognized the danger of corporatism in this country and how Nafta, ATO fuels its rise and jeopardizes our democracy. But people just won’t educate themselves. They won’t ask questions, won’t attend city government meetings because they enslave themselves to corporations and get sucked into debt. Obama & Clinton throw out a few bones--universal health care, partial withdrawal from Iraq-- to make you think they are practically revolutionary. And you believe them.
By e-jones, March 11 at 1:31 pm # Clark’s a phony. Neither rational nor radical. A corporate republicrat apologist.
By Bill Blackolive, March 11 at 9:07 am # Nader, Moorer, Goodman and sundry familiar names for US tv privately know there is the 9/11 coverup. Go to patriotsquestion9/11. Could we ever stop all this fool talk? Sure, Nader, Moorer, Goodman can be shot. The others of you have no excuse. Get ye to patriotsquestion9/ll and start a magazine or movie or newspaper or something besides disrespected street protests.
By kevtao, March 11 at 7:53 am # Mother Teresa spent a lifetime tirelessly and hopelessly pulling people off of the streets in Calcutta and around the world. Perhaps they died with some measure of compassion and dignity. She is on a fast track to sainthood. Ralph Nader has spent a lifetime tirelessly and hopelessly fighting the corporate nazi machine that controls our government AND an ignorant U.S. populace who would benefit from his advocacy if they used a tablespoon of the gray matter in their heads. Egomaniac? Perhaps. If you read “The Seventeen Traditions” you might call it a stubbornness through his upbringing to do what’s right.
By DennisD, March 11 at 7:32 am # SOSReal “change” is brought about by “real” people like Nader not the Bill Mays’ of the political landscape selling you “change” for just $19.99. The lobbyists and their corporate masters must laughing themselves silly watching this campaign. They already know the outcome. Same sh*t different wrapper. They’re just playing the diversity angle this time. Wise up.
By Ariela Lipton, March 11 at 7:13 am # Nader the Self Centered PersonRalph Nader is the one person who we can all thank for having the worse seven years of presidency ever. Why should be give him any credit now that he has become a self-absorbed person and is running in order to be a spoiler again. In his hayday he served the people but it is hard to believe that he is that knight in shiny armor at this point in his life. Perhaps he has been out of the limelight for too long and that is his reason from running again. I don’t believe we can give him a pass based only of what was.
By im4mary, March 11 at 4:53 am # I humbly beg to differ but Ralph is not the only candidate. If I recall, Dennis Kucinich also refused to be beholden to corporate pimps. He dropped out because he lacked funding and had to fight to keep his current position, which he still upholds. Just because Ralph jumped into the race at a later date does not make him the sole ‘virgin’. Had he decided to help Dennis, who has also been steadfast in his statements and actions, maybe Dennis might still be in the race (though highly doubtful). This primary election has been nothing more than a perfect example of how our votes aren’t really counted. It’s about mass manipulation amongst a host of other ills this country faces. Just sayin…
By bozhidar bob balkas, March 11 at 4:29 am # tallime banana, sings bellafonte. is say let's tallyisr holds w.o. trial or access to lawyers thousands of captives while calling them dysphemistically “prisoners”, “terrorists”. pals hold 1 soldier who has a lawyer. land theft, settling is vastly in isr’s favor. then there’s manhunt, demol’n of homes, villages, orchards. isr also builds walls. that’s unprecendented. isr also kills/maims more civs, including children, than pals do. isr uses cluster bombs. then theres’s a blockade. but most importantly, US/IOF aim, i deduce from facts just posited, to oust pals as soon as oil’s depleted to a degree and clean energy is available. US is afariad to give IOF the nod to procede at this time since EU and other oiless lands wouldn’t be amused. in any case, pals fate is sealed; it’s a done deal. and isr would still besmall, poor, w. indefensible borders. any other ex planation (s)? thank u.
By Jemma, March 11 at 4:42 pm # Re: tallime banana, sings bellafonte. is say let'sWHAT LANGUAGE DO YOU SPEAK?? JIBBERISH DOESN´T EVEN DESCRIBE IT.....MAYBE YOU MAKE SOME VALID POINTS, IT IS HARD TO TELL.
By leland nichols, March 11 at 2:06 am # The Joke's On HimThis piece belongs on The Onion or Colbert Report. Nader is not fueled by money, that’s true, his only juice is his ego. He has not made a contribution to America since Unsafe at Any Speed. If proof were needed it was supplied by ElkoJohn quoting Fox News. Add Your Comment |
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article